An integrative theory of resource discrepancies

被引:4
作者
Cannon, Christopher [1 ]
Goldsmith, Kelly [2 ]
Roux, Caroline [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hawaii Manoa, Shidler Coll Business, Honolulu, HI 96822 USA
[2] Vanderbilt Univ, Owen Grad Sch Management, Nashville, TN USA
[3] Concordia Univ, John Molson Sch Business, Montreal, PQ, Canada
关键词
agency; communion; power; resources; scarcity; social class; status; SOCIAL-CLASS; CONSUMER-BEHAVIOR; CONSPICUOUS CONSUMPTION; POWER; SELF; INEQUALITY; SCARCITY; CHOICE; IMPACT; MODEL;
D O I
10.1002/jcpy.1406
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
A great deal of work in consumer psychology has been devoted to understanding how individuals manage resource discrepancies. This includes tangible resources - such as money, food, and products - as well as intangible resources - such as time, skills, and social relationships. Resource discrepancies can either be positive - as in the case of having substantial wealth - or negative - as in the case of poverty. Several constructs across the behavioral sciences have been introduced to describe how consumers perceive their various resource discrepancies including, but not limited to, power, social status, scarcity, inequality, and social class. However, little guidance is provided to understand when and why these resource-based constructs can produce both overlapping and opposing consequences. This conceptual article provides a resolution to this issue by introducing an integrative theory that situates these constructs within the same unifying framework based on two fundamental dimensions: high (vs. low) personal control and self- (vs. other-) dependence. Based on this framework, we offer eight testable propositions and develop a research agenda for academics interested in studying resource discrepancies.
引用
收藏
页码:81 / 97
页数:17
相关论文
共 150 条
[51]   From power to action [J].
Galinsky, AD ;
Gruenfeld, DH ;
Magee, JC .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2003, 85 (03) :453-466
[52]   The Status Signals Paradox [J].
Garcia, Stephen M. ;
Weaver, Kimberlee ;
Chen, Patricia .
SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGICAL AND PERSONALITY SCIENCE, 2019, 10 (05) :690-696
[53]   Shared Time Scarcity and the Pursuit of Extraordinary Experiences [J].
Garcia-Rada, Ximena ;
Kim, Tami .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2021, 32 (12) :1871-1883
[54]   On Being Rejected A Meta-Analysis of Experimental Research on Rejection [J].
Gerber, Jonathan ;
Wheeler, Ladd .
PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2009, 4 (05) :468-488
[55]   Scarcity and Consumer Decision Making: Is Scarcity a Mindset, a Threat, a Reference Point, or a Journey? [J].
Goldsmith, Kelly ;
Griskevicius, Vladas ;
Hamilton, Rebecca .
JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR CONSUMER RESEARCH, 2020, 5 (04) :358-364
[56]   How Economic Inequality Shapes Thought and Action [J].
Goya-Tocchetto, Daniela ;
Payne, B. Keith .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER PSYCHOLOGY, 2022, 32 (01) :146-161
[57]   Going Green to Be Seen: Status, Reputation, and Conspicuous Conservation [J].
Griskevicius, Vladas ;
Tybur, Joshua M. ;
Van den Bergh, Bram .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2010, 98 (03) :392-404
[58]   Power and goal pursuit [J].
Guinote, Ana .
PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN, 2007, 33 (08) :1076-1087
[59]   Economic Inequality Shapes Judgments of Consumption [J].
Hagerty, Serena F. ;
Barasz, Kate ;
Norton, Michael, I .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER PSYCHOLOGY, 2022, 32 (01) :162-164
[60]   Inequality in socially permissible consumption [J].
Hagerty, Serena F. ;
Barasz, Kate .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2020, 117 (25) :14084-14093