No-reference video quality assessment from artifacts and content characteristics: a neuro-fuzzy framework for video quality evaluation

被引:1
作者
Kumar, M. Venkata Phani [1 ]
Ghosh, Monalisa [1 ]
Mahapatra, Sudipta [1 ]
机构
[1] IIT Kharagpur, Dept E & ECE, Kharagpur 721302, West Bengal, India
关键词
Video adaptation; Mean opinion score; Subjective quality; Objective quality; H.264/Advanced video coding (AVC); EVENT DELIVERY SYNCHRONIZATION; INTERACTIVITY; MODEL;
D O I
10.1007/s11042-023-17228-2
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Reliable assessment of video quality is important for video service providers as it directly impacts a viewer's quality of experience (QoE). Proliferation of video-based applications necessitates accurate and realistic video quality assessment. Impact on a user's QoE can be estimated by evaluating the perceptual quality of a video. In this direction, two no-reference video quality assessment models are proposed in this paper. The first one is feature extraction based predicted video quality measure and and the second one is dimension adaptation based predicted video quality measure. These two predict the quality scores of a distorted video respectively before and after adaptation of its encoding dimensions. The models compute the initial frame level quality scores using a set of spatio-temporal distortions and content characteristics extracted from the video. Afterwards, a multistage temporal pooling mechanism transforms the frame level quality scores of a video into video level quality scores. Finally, a trained neuro-fuzzy model predicts a video quality score for the video. The performance of each of the models is evaluated while predicting quality of videos in publicly available video quality databases. It is observed that the predicted quality scores have good correlation with the corresponding subjective quality scores.
引用
收藏
页码:48049 / 48074
页数:26
相关论文
共 65 条
  • [51] VQEG, 2003, Final VQEG report on the validation of objective models of video quality assessment phase II
  • [52] Vu P. V., 2011, 2011 18th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP 2011), P2505, DOI 10.1109/ICIP.2011.6116171
  • [53] Vu PV, 2016, Laboratory of computational perception & image quality
  • [54] Wang Z, 2003, CONF REC ASILOMAR C, P1398
  • [55] Image quality assessment: From error visibility to structural similarity
    Wang, Z
    Bovik, AC
    Sheikh, HR
    Simoncelli, EP
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON IMAGE PROCESSING, 2004, 13 (04) : 600 - 612
  • [56] The evolution of video quality measurement: From PSNR to hybrid metrics
    Winkler, Stefan
    Mohandas, Praveen
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BROADCASTING, 2008, 54 (03) : 660 - 668
  • [57] ACCURATE VIDEO-QUALITY ESTIMATION WITHOUT VIDEO DECODING
    Yamada, Toru
    Yachida, Shoji
    Senda, Yuzo
    Serizawa, Masahiro
    [J]. 2010 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ACOUSTICS, SPEECH, AND SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2010, : 2426 - 2429
  • [58] Content-Adaptive Packet-Layer Model for Quality Assessment of Networked Video Services
    Yang, Fuzheng
    Song, Jiarun
    Wan, Shuai
    Wu, Hong Ren
    [J]. IEEE JOURNAL OF SELECTED TOPICS IN SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2012, 6 (06) : 672 - 683
  • [59] No-Reference Quality Assessment for Networked Video via Primary Analysis of Bit Stream
    Yang, Fuzheng
    Wan, Shuai
    Xie, Qingpeng
    Wu, Hong Ren
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CIRCUITS AND SYSTEMS FOR VIDEO TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 20 (11) : 1544 - 1554
  • [60] FUZZY SETS
    ZADEH, LA
    [J]. INFORMATION AND CONTROL, 1965, 8 (03): : 338 - &