No-reference video quality assessment from artifacts and content characteristics: a neuro-fuzzy framework for video quality evaluation

被引:1
作者
Kumar, M. Venkata Phani [1 ]
Ghosh, Monalisa [1 ]
Mahapatra, Sudipta [1 ]
机构
[1] IIT Kharagpur, Dept E & ECE, Kharagpur 721302, West Bengal, India
关键词
Video adaptation; Mean opinion score; Subjective quality; Objective quality; H.264/Advanced video coding (AVC); EVENT DELIVERY SYNCHRONIZATION; INTERACTIVITY; MODEL;
D O I
10.1007/s11042-023-17228-2
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Reliable assessment of video quality is important for video service providers as it directly impacts a viewer's quality of experience (QoE). Proliferation of video-based applications necessitates accurate and realistic video quality assessment. Impact on a user's QoE can be estimated by evaluating the perceptual quality of a video. In this direction, two no-reference video quality assessment models are proposed in this paper. The first one is feature extraction based predicted video quality measure and and the second one is dimension adaptation based predicted video quality measure. These two predict the quality scores of a distorted video respectively before and after adaptation of its encoding dimensions. The models compute the initial frame level quality scores using a set of spatio-temporal distortions and content characteristics extracted from the video. Afterwards, a multistage temporal pooling mechanism transforms the frame level quality scores of a video into video level quality scores. Finally, a trained neuro-fuzzy model predicts a video quality score for the video. The performance of each of the models is evaluated while predicting quality of videos in publicly available video quality databases. It is observed that the predicted quality scores have good correlation with the corresponding subjective quality scores.
引用
收藏
页码:48049 / 48074
页数:26
相关论文
共 65 条
  • [1] RANK-SUM TESTS FOR DISPERSIONS
    ANSARI, AR
    BRADLEY, RA
    [J]. ANNALS OF MATHEMATICAL STATISTICS, 1960, 31 (04): : 1174 - 1189
  • [2] Argyropoulos S, 2011, INT CONF ACOUST SPEE, P1169
  • [3] Bakhtiari A.H., 2022, 2022 12 INT C COMPUT, P326, DOI [10.1109/ICCKE57176.2022.9960078, DOI 10.1109/ICCKE57176.2022.9960078]
  • [4] Borer S., 2010, Proceedings of the 2010 Second International Workshop on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX 2010), P218, DOI 10.1109/QOMEX.2010.5516155
  • [5] No-Reference Quality Assessment of H.264/AVC Encoded Video
    Brandao, Tomas
    Queluz, Maria Paula
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CIRCUITS AND SYSTEMS FOR VIDEO TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 20 (11) : 1437 - 1447
  • [6] Objective Video Quality Assessment Methods: A Classification, Review, and Performance Comparison
    Chikkerur, Shyamprasad
    Sundaram, Vijay
    Reisslein, Martin
    Karam, Lina J.
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BROADCASTING, 2011, 57 (02) : 165 - 182
  • [7] Video quality metric for bit rate, control via joint adjustment of quantization and frame rate
    Feghali, Rosario
    Speranza, Filippo
    Wang, Demin
    Vincent, Andre
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BROADCASTING, 2007, 53 (01) : 441 - 446
  • [8] Ghosh Monalisa, 2022, ICDCN 2022: 23rd International Conference on Distributed Computing and Networking, P19, DOI 10.1145/3491003.3491023
  • [9] Reduced-reference video quality assessment using discriminative local harmonic strength with motion consideration
    Gunawan, Irwan P.
    Ghanbari, Mohammed
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CIRCUITS AND SYSTEMS FOR VIDEO TECHNOLOGY, 2008, 18 (01) : 71 - 83
  • [10] MULTILAYER FEEDFORWARD NETWORKS ARE UNIVERSAL APPROXIMATORS
    HORNIK, K
    STINCHCOMBE, M
    WHITE, H
    [J]. NEURAL NETWORKS, 1989, 2 (05) : 359 - 366