Improved Indoor Positioning Model Based on UWB/IMU Tight Combination with Double-Loop Cumulative Error Estimation

被引：7

作者：

Zhu, Wenjie ^{[1
]}

Zhao, Rongyong ^{[1
]}

Zhang, Hao ^{[1
]}

Lu, Jianfeng ^{[1
]}

Zhang, Zhishu ^{[1
]}

Wei, Bingyu ^{[1
]}

Fan, Yuhang ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Tongji Univ, Sch Elect & Informat Engn, Shanghai 201804, Peoples R China

来源：

APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL | 2023年 / 13卷 / 18期

基金：

中国国家自然科学基金;

关键词：

UWB; IMU; indoor positioning error; extended Kalman filter; tight combination; cumulative error;

D O I：

10.3390/app131810046

中图分类号：

O6 [化学];

学科分类号：

0703 ;

摘要：

With the increasing applications of UWB indoor positioning technologies in industrial areas, to further enhance the positioning precision, the UWB/IMU combination method (UICM) has been considered as one of the most effective solutions to reduce non-line-of-sight (NLOS) errors. However, most conversional UICMs suffer from a high probability of positioning failure due to uncontrollable and cumulative errors from inertial measuring units (IMU). Hence, to address this issue, we improved the extended Kalman filter (EKF) algorithm of an indoor positioning model based on UWB/IMU tight combination with a double-loop error self-correction. Compared with conventional UICMs, this improved model consists of new modules for fixing time desynchronization, optimizing the threshold setting for UWB ranging, data fusion in NLOS, and double-loop error estimation, sequentially. Further, systematic error controllability analysis proved that the proposed model could satisfy the controllability of UWB indoor positioning systems. To validate this improved UICM, inevitable obstacles and atmospheric interferences were regarded as Gaussian white noises to verify its environmental adaptability. Finally, the experimental results showed that this proposed model outperformed the state-of-the-art UWB-based positioning models with a maximum deviation of 0.232 m (reduced by 83.93% compared to a pure UWB model and 43.14% compared to the conventional UWB/IMU model) and standard deviation of 0.09981 m (reduced by 88.35% compared to a pure UWB model and 22.21% compared to the conventional UWB-IMU model).

引用

页数：17