Patient influence on general practice service improvement decision making: a participatory research mixed-methods intervention study

被引:1
作者
Drinkwater, Jessica [1 ,2 ]
MacFarlane, Anne [3 ,4 ]
Twiddy, Maureen [5 ]
Meads, David [6 ]
Chadwick, Ruth H. [7 ,8 ]
Donnelly, Ailsa [8 ]
Gleeson, Phil [8 ]
Hayward, Nick [8 ]
Kelly, Michael [8 ]
Mir, Robina [8 ]
Prestwich, Graham [8 ]
Rathfelder, Martin [8 ]
Foy, Robbie [9 ]
机构
[1] Univ Manchester, Ctr Primary Care & Hlth Serv Res, Williamson Bldg,Oxford Rd, Manchester M13 9PL, Lancs, England
[2] Univ Leeds, Leeds Inst Hlth Sci, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
[3] Univ Limerick, Sch Med, Participatory Hlth Res Unit, Primary Healthcare Res, Limerick, Ireland
[4] Univ Limerick, Hlth Res Inst, Limerick, Ireland
[5] Univ Hull, Hull York Med Sch, Inst Clin & Appl Hlth, Mixed Methods, Kingston Upon Hull, N Humberside, England
[6] Univ Leeds, Leeds Inst Hlth Sci, Hlth Econ, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
[7] Univ Leeds, Leeds Inst Hlth Sci, Gen Practice Cores Grp, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
[8] Univ Leeds, Leeds Inst Hlth Sci, Gen Practice Cores Grp, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
[9] Univ Leeds, Leeds Inst Hlth Sci, Primary Care, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
general practice; patient participation; participatory research; primary care; PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT; QUALITY;
D O I
10.3399/BJGP.2023.0263
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background Health policy promotes patient participation in decision making about service organisation. In English general practice this happens through contractually required patient participation groups (PPGs). However, there are problems with the enactment of PPGs that have not been systematically addressed. Aim To observe how a co -designed theoryinformed intervention can increase representational legitimacy and facilitate power sharing to support PPGs to influence decision making about general practice service improvement. Design and setting Participatory action research to implement the intervention in two general practices in the North of England was undertaken. The intervention combined two different participatory practices: partnership working involving externally facilitated meetings with PPG members and staff; and consultation with the wider patient population using a bespoke discrete choice experiment (DCE). Method To illustrate decision making in PPGs, qualitative data are presented from participant observation notes and photographed visual data generated through participatory methods. The DCE results are summarised to illustrate how wider population priorities contributed to overall decision making. Observational data were thematically analysed using normalisation process theory with support from a multi-stakeholder co-research group. Results In both general practices, patients influenced decision making during PPG meetings and through the DCE, resulting in bespoke patientcentred action plans for service improvement. Power asymmetries were addressed through participatory methods, clarification of PPG roles in decision making, and addressing representational legitimacy through wider survey consultation. Conclusion Combining participatory practices and facilitated participatory methods enabled patients to influence decision making about general practice service improvement. The policy of mandatory PPGs needs updating to recognise the need to resource participation in a meaningful way.
引用
收藏
页码:E552 / E559
页数:8
相关论文
共 48 条
  • [1] Why values elicitation techniques enable people to make informed decisions about cancer trial participation
    Abhyankar, Purva
    Bekker, Hilary L.
    Summers, Barbara A.
    Velikova, Galina
    [J]. HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2011, 14 : 20 - 32
  • [2] Amaya-Amaya M, 2008, ECON NON-MARK GOOD, V11, P13
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2013, NHS CONSTITUTION NHS
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2006, TOOLS TOGETHER NOW 1
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2010, EQ EXC LIB NHS
  • [6] LADDER OF CITIZEN PARTICIPATION
    ARNSTEIN, SR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF PLANNERS, 1969, 35 (04): : 216 - 224
  • [7] Understanding why decision aids work: linking process with outcome
    Bekker, HL
    Hewison, J
    Thornton, JG
    [J]. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2003, 50 (03) : 323 - 329
  • [8] What Are the Key Ingredients for Effective Public Involvement in Health Care Improvement and Policy Decisions? A Randomized Trial Process Evaluation
    Boivin, Antoine
    Lehoux, Pascale
    Burgers, Jako
    Grol, Richard
    [J]. MILBANK QUARTERLY, 2014, 92 (02) : 319 - 350
  • [9] Involving patients in setting priorities for healthcare improvement: a cluster randomized trial
    Boivin, Antoine
    Lehoux, Pascale
    Lacombe, Real
    Burgers, Jako
    Grol, Richard
    [J]. IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2014, 9
  • [10] Key components of shared decision making models: a systematic review
    Bomhof-Roordink, Hanna
    Gartner, Fania R.
    Stiggelbout, Anne M.
    Pieterse, Arwen H.
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2019, 9 (12):