Sustainable land use: Policy implications of systematic land regularization in Mozambique

被引:1
作者
Carrilho, Joao [1 ,4 ,5 ]
Dgedge, Gustavo [2 ]
dos Santos, Pedro Manuel Pinto [3 ,5 ]
Trindade, Jorge [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Aberta, Dept Sci & Technol, P-1269001 Lisbon, Portugal
[2] Univ Pedag, Fac Earth Sci & Environm, Dept Geog, Maputo, Mozambique
[3] Univ Lisbon, Ctr Estudos Geog, Inst Geog & Ordenamento Terr, P-1600276 Lisbon, Portugal
[4] Univ Aberta, Ctr Estudos Globais, P-1269001 Lisbon, Portugal
[5] Lab Associado TERRA, Lisbon, Portugal
关键词
Sustainability; Land use plan; Rural-urban transition; Community delimitation; Land tenure regularization; Fit for purpose;
D O I
10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.107046
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Security of land tenure is key to achieve the sustainable development goal of eradicating poverty and can be improved through the regularization of rights to land, property, and natural resources. Making cities and human settlements sustainable, requires participatory and integrated land use planning, accounting for the land's potential and constraints, with a view to medium and long-term use. The government of Mozambique is actively promoting a process of massive regularization, under common terms of reference for service providers. The terms of reference also intend to achieve a linkage between regularization and community land use plans. The aim of this research is to assess the robustness of such plans to detect and overcome potential conflicts between the given and the potential land use, as well as constraints, weaknesses and threats. This research uses a mixed documental analysis to undertake an ex-ante assessment of 15 participatory community land use plans. Five categories are assumed as a reference of good practices in land use planning suggested by universal and African literature. It was found that the common terms of reference and guidelines promote participatory capacity and provides general directions of community development. However, good practices of land use planning such as effective participation in all phases, alternative scenarios for future land use, regional integration, and disasters risk management are less promoted. It is suggested that the guidelines go beyond the immediate needs of land register, to consider that such interventions in rural areas shape the culture of land use, which, in turn, will influence sustainability in higher level settlements.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
African Union, 2009, Land policy in Africa: A framework to strengthen land rights, enhance productivity and secure livelihoods
[2]   Planning without plans? Nomocracy or teleocracy for social-spatial ordering [J].
Alexander, E. R. ;
Mazza, Luigi ;
Moroni, Stefano .
PROGRESS IN PLANNING, 2012, 77 :37-87
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2020, Africa's Urbanisation Dynamics 2020: Africapolis. Mapping a New Urban Geography. West African Studies, DOI [DOI 10.1787/B6BCCB81-EN, 10.1787/b6bccb81-en]
[4]  
[Anonymous], US
[5]  
Antonio D., 2013, The Social Tenure Domain Model: A Specialisation of LADM towards bridging the Information Divide1
[6]   Assessing the impacts of land tenure regularization: Evidence from Rwanda and Ethiopia [J].
Bizoza, Alfred R. ;
Opio-Omoding, James .
LAND USE POLICY, 2021, 100
[7]   Toward a land zoning negotiation support platform: "Tips and tricks" for participatory land use planning in Laos [J].
Bourgoin, Jeremy ;
Castella, Jean-Christophe ;
Pullar, David ;
Lestrelin, Guillaume ;
Bouahom, Bounthanom .
LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2012, 104 (02) :270-278
[8]   Sustainability in Peri-Urban Informal Settlements: A Review [J].
Carrilho, Joao ;
Trindade, Jorge .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (13)
[9]  
Chambers R., 1992, Discussion Paper - Institute of Development Studies, University of Sussex
[10]  
Chigbu U.E., 2016, Tenureresponsivelanduse planning:Aguideforcountrylevelimplementation(GuideFoImplementation6(2016)