Political economy of development in the Arab republics: The state and socio-economic coalitions

被引:1
作者
Hatab, Shimaa [1 ]
机构
[1] Kings Coll London, Global Inst, Fac Social Sci & Publ Policy, Sch Global Affairs, Bush House,30 Aldwych, London WC2B 4BG, England
关键词
Ottoman legacy; colonial legacy; state capitalism; cronyism; path-dependent development; Middle East; Nasserism; MIDDLE-EAST; SYRIA; RISE; ORIGINS; GROWTH; MARKET; ROOTS; ISLAM;
D O I
10.1080/20780389.2023.2209285
中图分类号
K [历史、地理];
学科分类号
06 ;
摘要
The question of socio-economic underdevelopment in the Arab region has been a perennial theme in development studies. While some scholars highlight the long duree effect of the Ottoman institutional legacy, others place the blame on the legacy of exploitation and expropriation of the colonial practices in the region. The article reaches beyond the two accounts (albeit departing from the colonial economic basis) and brings out the agency of the post-colonial elites who altered the socio-economic foundation of the political class and transformed processes of capital accumulation and labour commodification. I argue that the processes of state-building accompanied by social engineering measures represented a 'critical juncture' that impinged on state autonomy and its bureaucratic capacity and left an indelible imprint on development strategies. The article unpacks three mechanisms that proved consequential for economic policy outcomes: (1) the degree of elite autonomy to formulate policies, (2) the power of social classes to contest economic policies, and (3) the capacity of state bureaucracy to implement policies and allocate resources. A critical political economy perspective, that reaches beyond the reification of the state and examines the interaction between 'elite deals' and 'social bargains', offers a nuanced account for varied development records across the region.
引用
收藏
页码:281 / 304
页数:24
相关论文
共 100 条
[1]  
Adly Amr., 2020, Cleft Capitalism: The Social Origins of Failed Market Making in Egypt
[2]   Competition, imitation and growth with step-by-step innovation [J].
Aghion, P ;
Harris, C ;
Howitt, P ;
Vickers, J .
REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 2001, 68 (03) :467-492
[3]  
Amsden AH., 1989, ASIAS NEXT GIANT S K
[4]   THE STATE IN THE MIDDLE-EAST AND NORTH-AFRICA [J].
ANDERSON, L .
COMPARATIVE POLITICS, 1987, 20 (01) :1-18
[5]  
Ayubi N.M., 1980, BUREAUCRACY POLITICS
[6]  
Ayubi N.N., 2001, Overstating the Arab State: Politics and Society in the Middle East
[7]  
Barkey K, 2008, EMPIRE OF DIFFERENCE: THE OTTOMANS IN COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE, P1, DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511790645
[8]  
BATATU H, 1981, MIDDLE EAST J, V35, P331
[9]  
BATES R., 1988, POLITICAL EC DEV RAT
[10]  
Ben Ali, 1997, EC TRANSITION MIDDLE, P183