Spatial representation of renewable technologies in generation expansion planning models

被引:5
|
作者
Phillips, K. [1 ,3 ]
Moncada, J. A. [1 ,3 ]
Ergun, H. [2 ,3 ]
Delarue, E. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Dept Mech Engn, Appl Mech & Energy Convers TME, Celestijnenlaan 300 ,box 2421, B-3001 Leuven, Belgium
[2] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Dept Elect Engn, Elect Energy Syst & Applicat ELECTA, Kasteelpark Arenberg 10,box 2445, B-3001 Leuven, Belgium
[3] EnergyVille, Thor Pk 8310, B-3600 Genk, Belgium
关键词
Generation expansion planning; Spatially-explicit; Renewable energy; Europe; Time series; GRID INTERCONNECTIONS; POWER-SYSTEM; ENERGY; OPTIMIZATION; WIND; ELECTRICITY; REANALYSIS; AMERICA; EUROPE;
D O I
10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.121092
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
The increasing share of intermittent Renewable Energy Sources (iRES) in the energy mix leads to a growing need for their accurate representation in energy system models. In this paper, we analyze how the results of generation planning models are impacted by the spatial representation used to model intermittent renewable technologies. It is shown that the spatial resolution, and to a lesser extent the spatial aggregation method used in a planning model, have a significant influence on the obtained system cost. The effect is quantified in a case study of European geographical scale, by varying the spatial resolution from highly resolved (hundreds of sites) to highly aggregated (1 site). A resolution-dependency of the system cost is observed under multiple renewable generation targets, and different renewable capacity restrictions. In doing so, we highlight the importance of implementing an appropriate capacity limit, especially when a high spatial resolution is used. Additionally, basic spatial aggregation methods-to process high resolution input data-are compared.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Integrated renewable-conventional generation expansion planning using multiobjective framework
    Aghaei, J.
    Akbari, M. A.
    Roosta, A.
    Gitizadeh, M.
    Niknam, T.
    IET GENERATION TRANSMISSION & DISTRIBUTION, 2012, 6 (08) : 773 - 784
  • [32] Robust generation expansion planning considering high penetration renewable energies uncertainty
    Abdalla, Omar H.
    Abu Adma, Maged A.
    Ahmed, Abdelmonem S.
    ENGINEERING REPORTS, 2020, 2 (07)
  • [33] Generation expansion planning with renewable energy credit markets: A bilevel programming approach
    Nguyen, Hieu T.
    Felder, Frank A.
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2020, 276
  • [34] Renewable power generation employed in an integrated dynamic distribution network expansion planning
    Bagheri, A.
    Monsef, H.
    Lesani, H.
    ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEMS RESEARCH, 2015, 127 : 280 - 296
  • [35] Risk based multiobjective generation expansion planning considering renewable energy sources
    Gitizadeh, Mohsen
    Kaji, Mahdi
    Aghaei, Jamshid
    ENERGY, 2013, 50 : 74 - 82
  • [36] Designing effective and efficient incentive policies for renewable energy in generation expansion planning
    Zhou, Ying
    Wang, Lizhi
    McCalley, James D.
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2011, 88 (06) : 2201 - 2209
  • [37] Impact of network payment schemes on transmission expansion planning with variable renewable generation
    Bravo, Diego
    Sauma, Enzo
    Contreras, Javier
    de la Torre, Sebastian
    Aguado, Jose A.
    Pozo, David
    ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2016, 56 : 410 - 421
  • [38] Generation Expansion Planning considering the development of Renewable Zones and Load Distribution Factors
    Godinez, Sergio
    Badaoui, Mohamed
    Avila Camarena, Jesus
    Fuerte-Esquivel, Claudio R.
    9TH INTERNATIONAL YOUTH CONFERENCE ON ENERGY, IYCE 2024, 2024,
  • [39] An improved treatment of operating reserves in generation expansion planning models
    Gonzato, Sebastian
    Bruninx, Kenneth
    Delarue, Erik
    2020 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PROBABILISTIC METHODS APPLIED TO POWER SYSTEMS (PMAPS), 2020,
  • [40] Regionalizing Input Data for Generation and Transmission Expansion Planning Models
    Slednev, Viktor
    Ruppert, Manuel
    Bertsch, Valentin
    Fichtner, Wolf
    Meyer-Huebner, Nico
    Suriyah, Michael
    Leibfried, Thomas
    Gerstner, Philipp
    Schick, Michael
    Heuveline, Vincent
    ADVANCES IN ENERGY SYSTEM OPTIMIZATION, 2017, : 205 - 217