Screening of maize inbred lines and evaluation of hybrids for their resistance to fall armyworm

被引:4
作者
Asare, Stephen [1 ]
Kena, Alexander [1 ]
Amoah, Stephen [1 ]
Annor, Benjamin [1 ]
Osekre, Enoch A. [1 ]
Akromah, Richard [1 ]
机构
[1] Kwame Nkrumah Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Crop & Soil Sci, Kumasi, Ghana
来源
PLANT STRESS | 2023年 / 8卷
关键词
Natural; Artificial; Infestation; Maize genotypes; Analysis; Variance; Cluster; PCA; Biplot; SPODOPTERA-FRUGIPERDA; GERMPLASM LINES; REGISTRATION; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.stress.2023.100148
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
Maize yield losses due to fall armyworm (FAW) infestation is in the range of 22-67%, amounting to millions of US dollars in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). Identifying new sources of maize genotypes with resistance to insects and a better understanding of resistance mechanisms have opened the avenue for the exploration of host-plant resistance (HPR). The present study was carried out to assess the resistance of maize inbred lines and hybrids to FAW foliar feeding damage through natural and artificial screening. Thirty-five (35) maize inbred lines obtained from the International Maize and Wheat Improvement center (CIMMYT) and the United State Department of Agriculture - Agricultural Research Services (USDA-ARS) were screened for fall armyworm resistance in Ghana in 2019. In addition, sixty (60) single-cross hybrids and twenty (20) double-crosses developed from 17 desirable inbred lines were evaluated for resistance to fall armyworm using artificial and natural infestations in 2020 and 2021. Significant differences were recorded among the inbred lines, F1 hybrids, and the double-crosses. The cluster and principal component analysis classified the thirty-five inbred lines into four groups suggesting the presence of wide variability. Hybrids (CML343*CML 346)//(CML124*MP 713), (MP7 13*MP705)//(CML123*MP713), (CML331*MP701)//(MP702*MP705), (CML330*MP702)//(CML123*MP706), (CML122*MP713)//(CML330*MP701), (OBT*MP708)//(MP713*MP705),MP704*CML122)//(CML123*MP713 ), (CML123*MP708)//(CML122*MP713) and (CML330*MP701)//(MP713*MP705) were found to be promising. These hybrids should be recommended for further testing and commercialization in SSA.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2018, CIENC RURAL
[2]  
Badu-Apraku B., 2017, Advances in Genetic Enhancement of Early and Extra-Early Maize for Sub-Saharan Africa, P3, DOI [10.1007/978-3-319-64852-1, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-64852-1]
[3]   Understanding the factors influencing fall armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda JE Smith) damage in African smallholder maize fields and quantifying its impact on yield. A case study in Eastern Zimbabwe [J].
Baudron, Frederic ;
Zaman-Allah, Mainassara Abdou ;
Chaipa, Isaac ;
Chari, Newton ;
Chinwada, Peter .
CROP PROTECTION, 2019, 120 :141-150
[4]   Efficacy of Bt Maize for Control of Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in South Africa [J].
Botha, A. S. ;
Erasmus, Annemie ;
du Plessis, Hannalene ;
Van den Berg, Johnnie .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC ENTOMOLOGY, 2019, 112 (03) :1260-1266
[5]   Insect host location: a volatile situation [J].
Bruce, TJA ;
Wadhams, LJ ;
Woodcock, CM .
TRENDS IN PLANT SCIENCE, 2005, 10 (06) :269-274
[6]   Physiological, Nutritional, and Biochemical Bases of Corn Resistance to Foliage-Feeding Fall Armyworm [J].
Chen, Yigen ;
Ni, Xinzhi ;
Buntin, G. David .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ECOLOGY, 2009, 35 (03) :297-306
[7]   Molecular methods to detect Spodoptera frugiperda in Ghana, and implications for monitoring the spread of invasive species in developing countries [J].
Cock, Matthew J. W. ;
Beseh, Patrick K. ;
Buddie, Alan G. ;
Cafa, Giovanni ;
Crozier, Jayne .
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2017, 7
[8]  
Davis F. M., 1992, Technical Bulletin - Mississippi Agricultural and Forestry Experiment Station, P1
[9]   Insect colony, planting date, and plant growth stage effects on screening maize for leaf-feeding resistance to fall armyworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) [J].
Davis, FM ;
Wiseman, BR ;
Williams, WP ;
Widstrom, NW .
FLORIDA ENTOMOLOGIST, 1996, 79 (03) :317-328
[10]  
Day R., 2017, Outlooks on Pest Management, V28, P196, DOI 10.1564/v28_oct_02