Ministernotomy compared with right anterior minithoracotomy for aortic valve surgery

被引:25
作者
Bonacchi, Massimo [1 ,6 ]
Dokollari, Aleksander [2 ]
Parise, Orlando [3 ]
Sani, Guido [1 ,4 ]
Prifti, Edvin [5 ]
Bisleri, Gianluigi
Gelsomino, Sandro [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Florence, Dept Expt & Clin Med, Cardiac Surg Unit, Florence, Italy
[2] Univ Toronto, St Michaels Hosp, Div Cardiac Surg, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Maastricht Univ, Cardiovasc Res Inst Maastricht CARIM, Med Ctr, Maastricht, Netherlands
[4] Univ Siena, Dept Med Biotech nol, Cardiac Surg, Siena, Italy
[5] Univ Hosp Ctr Tirana, Div Cardiac Surg, Tirana, Albania
[6] Univ Florence, Careggi Teaching Hosp, Dept Expt & Clin Med, Cardiac Surg Unit, Largo Brambilla 3, I-50134 Florence, Italy
关键词
minimally invasive aortic valve surgery; min-isternotomy; minithoracotomy; REPLACEMENT; OUTCOMES; STERNOTOMY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jtcvs.2021.03.125
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives: Ministernotomy and right anterior minithoracotomy are the 2 main techniques applied for minimally invasive aortic valve replacement. The goal of this study is to compare early and long-term outcomes of both techniques.Methods: The data of 2419 patients undergoing isolated minimally invasive aortic valve replacement between 1999 and 2019 were prospectively collected. Retrospectively, patients were divided into the ministernotomy group (n = 1352) and the minithoracotomy group (n = 1067). Results: After propensity score matching, 986 patients remained in each group. Operation time and rate of conversion to full sternotomy were significantly higher in the minithoracotomy group than in the ministernotomy group (184.6 + 45.2 vs 241.3 + 68.6, relative risk, 2.54, P = .005 and .09 vs .23, relative risk, 1.45, P = .013, respectively). The 30-day mortality, excluding cardiac death, was lower in the ministernotomy group than in the minithoracotomy group (0.012 vs 0.028, relative risk, 1.41, P = .011, respectively); the intensive care unit length of stay (12.4 vs 16.5, relative risk, 1.62, P = .037, respectively) and hospital length of stay (5.4 vs 8.7, relative risk, 1.74 P = .028, respectively) were significantly longer in the minithoracotomy group. The minithoracotomy surgical approach was the strongest independent predictor of early mortality (odds ratio, 4.24 [1.67-7.35], P = .002). The actuarial survival by Kaplan-Meier analysis at 1, 3, 5, 10, and 20 years was significantly better in the ministernotomy group than in the minithoracotomy group (P = .0001). Actuarial freedom from reoperation at 5 years was 97.3% + 4.4% in the ministernotomy group versus 95.8% + 5.2% in the minithoracotomy group (P = .087).Conclusions: Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement using ministernotomy is associated with reduced operative time, intensive care unit stay, hospital length of stay, and postoperative morbidities and incisional pain, and improves early and long-term mortality.
引用
收藏
页码:1022 / +
页数:13
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   Is ministernotomy superior to right anterior minithoracotomy in minimally invasive aortic valve replacement? [J].
Balmforth, Damian ;
Harky, Amer ;
Lall, Kulvinder ;
Uppal, Rakesh .
INTERACTIVE CARDIOVASCULAR AND THORACIC SURGERY, 2017, 25 (05) :818-821
[2]   Aortic Valve Replacement: Are We Spoiled for Choice? [J].
Bashir, Mohamad ;
Harky, Amer ;
Bleetman, David ;
Adams, Benjamin ;
Roberts, Neil ;
Balmforth, Damian ;
Yap, John ;
Lall, Kulvinder ;
Shipolini, Alex ;
Oo, Aung ;
Uppal, Rakesh .
SEMINARS IN THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2017, 29 (03) :265-272
[3]  
Boix-Garibo Ricardo, 2015, Interv Cardiol, V10, P144, DOI 10.15420/ICR.2015.10.03.144
[4]   Does ministernotomy improve postoperative outcome in aortic valve operation? A prospective randomized study [J].
Bonacchi, M ;
Prifti, E ;
Giunti, G ;
Frati, G ;
Sani, G .
ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2002, 73 (02) :460-465
[5]   Deep sternal infections after in situ bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting for left ventricular myocardial revascularization: predictors and influence on 20-year outcomes [J].
Bonacchi, Massimo ;
Prifti, Edvin ;
Bugetti, Marco ;
Parise, Orlando ;
Sani, Guido ;
Johnson, Daniel M. ;
Cabrucci, Francesco ;
Gelsomino, Sandro .
JOURNAL OF THORACIC DISEASE, 2018, 10 (09) :5208-+
[6]   Population-Wide Trends in Aortic Stenosis Incidence and Outcomes [J].
Bonow, Robert O. ;
Greenland, Philip .
CIRCULATION, 2015, 131 (11) :969-971
[7]   Minimally invasive valve surgery versus the conventional approach [J].
Cooley, DA .
ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 1998, 66 (03) :1101-1105
[8]   Minimally invasive approach for aortic valve operations [J].
Cosgrove, DM ;
Sabik, JF .
ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 1996, 62 (02) :596-597
[9]   2017 ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease [J].
Falk, Volkmar ;
Baumgartner, Helmut ;
Bax, Jeroen J. ;
De Bonis, Michele ;
Hamm, Christian ;
Holm, Per Johan ;
Iung, Bernard ;
Lancellotti, Patrizio ;
Lansac, Emmanuel ;
Rodriguez Munoz, Daniel ;
Rosenhek, Raphael ;
Sjogren, Johan ;
Tornos Mas, Pilar ;
Vahanian, Alec ;
Walther, Thomas ;
Wendler, Olaf ;
Windecker, Stephan ;
Luis Zamorano, Jose .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 2017, 52 (04) :616-664
[10]   Non-sutureless minimally invasive aortic valve replacement: mini-sternotomy versus mini-thoracotomy: a series of 1130 patients [J].
Fattouch, Khalil ;
Moscarelli, Marco ;
Del Giglio, Mauro ;
Albertini, Alberto ;
Comoglio, Chiara ;
Coppola, Roberto ;
Nasso, Giuseppe ;
Speziale, Giuseppe .
INTERACTIVE CARDIOVASCULAR AND THORACIC SURGERY, 2016, 23 (02) :253-258