Workplace incivility: A retrospective review and future research agenda

被引:28
作者
Agarwal, Shailja [1 ]
Pandey, Ritesh [1 ]
Kumar, Satish [2 ,3 ]
Lim, Weng Marc [6 ,7 ,8 ]
Agarwal, Pankaj K. [4 ]
Malik, Ashish [5 ]
机构
[1] Inst Management Technol, Ghaziabad, India
[2] Malaviya Natl Inst Technol Jaipur, Dept Management Studies, Jaipur 302017, Rajasthan, India
[3] Swinburne Univ Technol, Sch Business, Jalan Simpang Tiga, Kuching 93350, Malaysia
[4] Indian Inst Management, Jammu, India
[5] Univ Newcastle, Newcastle Business Sch, Callaghan, Australia
[6] Sunway Univ, Sunway Business Sch, Sunway City, Selangor, Malaysia
[7] Swinburne Univ Technol, Sch Business Law & Entrepreneurship, Hawthorn, Vic, Australia
[8] Swinburne Univ Technol, Fac Business Design & Arts, Kuching, Sarawak, Malaysia
关键词
Workplace incivility; Uncivil behaviors; Bibliometric analysis; Network analysis; TCCM framework; MODERATING ROLE; BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS; COWORKER INCIVILITY; IMPACT; WORK; AGGRESSION; CIVILITY; BEHAVIOR; OUTCOMES; TARGETS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ssci.2022.105990
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Workplace incivility (WI), since its formalization as a research construct in 1999, has come to occupy an increasingly important place in scientific discourse, resulting in exponential growth in its research output. WI is servere as it is widely considered as the "cancer" of the workplace, thereby calling for urgent and serious attention. The persistence of WI and its continued research further highlight the all-pervasive nature of this unprofessional behavior. The goal of the present study is to map the terrain of extant research on WI, conducted over 22 years (1999-2021), using a bibliometric analysis and the theory-characteristics-context-methodology (TCCM) framework for greater efficiency and objectivity. Using data of 382 publications retrieved from the Scopus database, we investigate the output and obtain information about influential authors, countries and ter-ritories, institutions, publications, and outlets for WI research. We also engage in a network analysis to unearth relationships between topics represented through keywords to identify the themes and sub-themes in the body of WI research. Finally, using the TCCM framework, we identify important gaps in the WI literature, such as the lack of WI research across cross cultural settings, the lack of sectorial comparisons on the WI phenomenon, and the lack of analyses of both pre-emptive and redressal interventions to prevent and address WI, among other gaps. Finally, we outline a set of 12 specific recommendations for future research on WI.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 100 条
[1]  
Abdullah H.O., 2022, PREDICTING POSITIVE
[2]  
Akella D., 2019, Organization Management Journal, V16, P55
[3]   Tit for tat? The spiraling effect of incivility in the workplace [J].
Andersson, LM ;
Pearson, CM .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1999, 24 (03) :452-471
[4]   Getting even or moving on? Power, procedural justice, and types of offense as predictors of revenge, forgiveness, reconciliation, and avoidance in organizations [J].
Aquino, Karl ;
Tripp, Thomas M. ;
Bies, Robert J. .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2006, 91 (03) :653-668
[5]   Workplace Victimization: Aggression from the Target's Perspective [J].
Aquino, Karl ;
Thau, Stefan .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2009, 60 :717-741
[6]   A Bibliometric Mapping of the Structure of STEM Education using Co-Word Analysis [J].
Assefa, Shimelis G. ;
Rorissa, Abebe .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 64 (12) :2513-2536
[7]  
Babenko-Mould Yolanda, 2014, Int J Nurs Educ Scholarsh, V11, DOI 10.1515/ijnes-2014-0023
[8]  
Bambi Stefano, 2017, Acta Biomed, V88, P39, DOI 10.23750/abm.v88i5-S.6838
[9]  
Baron RA, 1996, AGGRESSIVE BEHAV, V22, P161
[10]   Accounting for within-person differences in how people respond to daily incivility at work [J].
Beattie, Larissa ;
Griffin, Barbara .
JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2014, 87 (03) :625-644