The importance of appraising articles and conducting psychiatric journal clubs

被引:0
作者
Miller, Edward [1 ,7 ]
Weightman, Michael James [1 ,2 ]
Basu, Ashna [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Amos, Andrew [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Auckland, Sch Med, Auckland, New Zealand
[2] Flinders Univ S Australia, Coll Med & Publ Hlth, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[3] Prince Wales Hosp, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[4] UNSW, Discipline Psychiat & Mental Hlth, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[5] New Zealand Coll Psychiat, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[6] James Cook Univ, Sch Med & Dent, Townsville, Qld, Australia
[7] Fac Med & Hlth Sci, Div Psychol Med, Bldg 507,28 Pk Ave, Auckland 1023, New Zealand
关键词
psychiatric education; journal club; basic science;
D O I
10.1177/10398562231191678
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Objective To describe the importance of scientifically rigorous journal clubs in psychiatric education, and to provide a framework to effectively run journal clubs and appraise articles in a journal club format. This paper explores the concept of journal clubs and describes issues with the current state of academic science. It then lists factors associated with effectiveness of journal clubs and outlines a structure for appraising articles relevant to psychiatric practice in a journal club format. Conclusions Current models of academic research and publishing, which can reward practices vulnerable to multiple forms of bias, make the consistent and valued use of journal clubs in psychiatric education and continuing professional development more important than ever. The literature shows that journal clubs can provide a valuable forum for mental health clinicians to update themselves on recent medical and scientific knowledge, while practicing and teaching skills in critical appraisal of research, statistics, clinical decision-making and epidemiology.
引用
收藏
页码:725 / 729
页数:5
相关论文
共 18 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2018, RETR COR COVID 19 PA
  • [2] Aronson Jeffrey K, 2017, Evid Based Med, V22, P232, DOI 10.1136/ebmed-2017-110861
  • [3] Four problems of the h-index for assessing the research productivity and impact of individual authors
    Bi, Henry H.
    [J]. SCIENTOMETRICS, 2023, 128 (05) : 2677 - 2691
  • [4] How to run an effective journal club: a systematic review
    Deenadayalan, Y.
    Grimmer-Somers, K.
    Prior, M.
    Kumar, S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2008, 14 (05) : 898 - 911
  • [5] Do Pressures to Publish Increase Scientists' Bias? An Empirical Support from US States Data
    Fanelli, Daniele
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2010, 5 (04):
  • [6] Fazackerley A., 2023, TOO GREEDYMASS WALKO
  • [7] Occurrence and nature of questionable research practices in the reporting of messages and conclusions in international scientific Health Services Research publications: a structured assessment of publications authored by researchers in the Netherlands
    Gerrits, Reinie G.
    Jansen, Tessa
    Mulyanto, Joko
    van den Berg, Michael J.
    Klazinga, Niek S.
    Kringos, Dionne S.
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2019, 9 (05):
  • [8] Why most published research findings are false
    Ioannidis, JPA
    [J]. PLOS MEDICINE, 2005, 2 (08) : 696 - 701
  • [9] The integrity of the research record: a mess so big and so deep and so tall
    Lee, William
    Casey, Patricia
    Poole, Norman
    Kaufman, Kenneth R.
    Lawrie, Stephen M.
    Malhi, Gin
    Petkova, Eva
    Siddiqi, Najma
    Bhui, Kamaldeep
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2022, 221 (03) : 580 - 581
  • [10] THE JOURNAL CLUB AND MEDICAL-EDUCATION - OVER 100 YEARS OF UNRECORDED HISTORY
    LINZER, M
    [J]. POSTGRADUATE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1987, 63 (740) : 475 - 478