The performance of machine learning approaches for attenuation correction of PET in neuroimaging: A meta-analysis

被引:1
作者
Raymond, Confidence [1 ,2 ]
Jurkiewicz, Michael T. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Orunmuyi, Akintunde [4 ]
Liu, Linshan [2 ]
Dada, Michael Oluwaseun [5 ]
Ladefoged, Claes N. [6 ]
Teuho, Jarmo [7 ,8 ]
Anazodo, Udunna C. [1 ,2 ,9 ]
机构
[1] Western Univ, Dept Med Biophys, London, ON, Canada
[2] Lawson Hlth Res Inst, London, ON, Canada
[3] Western Univ, Dept Med Imaging, London, ON, Canada
[4] Kenyatta Univ Teaching Res & Referral Hosp, Nairobi, Kenya
[5] Fed Univ Technol, Dept Phys, Minna, Nigeria
[6] Rigshospitalet, Dept Clin Physiol Nucl Med & PET, Copenhagen, Denmark
[7] Turku Univ, Turku PET Ctr, Turku, Finland
[8] Turku Univ Hosp, Turku, Finland
[9] Montreal Neurol Inst, 3801 Rue Univ, Montreal, PQ H3A 2B4, Canada
关键词
Machine learning; Attenuation correction; Synthetic; -CT; Neuroimaging; PET; MRI; Brain PET; Systematic review; BRAIN; IMAGE; RECONSTRUCTION; ATLAS; TESTS; BIAS;
D O I
10.1016/j.neurad.2023.01.157
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: This systematic review provides a consensus on the clinical feasibility of machine learning (ML) methods for brain PET attenuation correction (AC). Performance of ML-AC were compared to clinical standards.Methods: Two hundred and eighty studies were identified through electronic searches of brain PET studies published between January 1, 2008, and August 1, 2022. Reported outcomes for image quality, tissue classifi-cation performance, regional and global bias were extracted to evaluate ML-AC performance. Methodological quality of included studies and the quality of evidence of analysed outcomes were assessed using QUADAS-2 and GRADE, respectively.Results: A total of 19 studies (2371 participants) met the inclusion criteria. Overall, the global bias of ML methods was 0.76 +/- 1.2%. For image quality, the relative mean square error (RMSE) was 0.20 +/- 0.4 while for tissues classification, the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) for bone/soft tissue/air were 0.82 +/- 0.1 / 0.95 +/- 0.03 / 0.85 +/- 0.14. Conclusions: In general, ML-AC performance is within acceptable limits for clinical PET imaging. The sparse information on ML-AC robustness and its limited qualitative clinical evaluation may hinder clinical imple-mentation in neuroimaging, especially for PET/MRI or emerging brain PET systems where standard AC approaches are not readily available.(c) 2023 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:315 / 326
页数:12
相关论文
empty
未找到相关数据