Techno-economic analysis of high-power solid oxide electrolysis cell system

被引:19
作者
Bui, Tuananh [1 ,2 ]
Lee, Dongkeun [1 ]
Ahn, Kook Young [1 ,2 ]
Kim, Young Sang [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Korea Inst Machinery & Mat KIMM, Dept Zero Carbon Fuel & Power Generat, 156 Gajeongbuk Ro, Daejeon, South Korea
[2] Univ Sci & Technol UST, KIMM Campus,156 Gajeongbuk Ro, Daejeon 34103, South Korea
关键词
Solid oxide electrolysis cell (SOEC); High -power SOEC; Economic analysis; Levelized cost of hydrogen (LCOH); HIGH-TEMPERATURE ELECTROLYSIS; HYDROGEN-PRODUCTION SYSTEM; ENERGY-STORAGE; EFFICIENCY;
D O I
10.1016/j.enconman.2023.116704
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
Water electrolysis using solid oxide electrolysis cells is a promising method for hydrogen production because it is highly efficient, clean, and scalable. Recently, a lot of researches focusing on development of high-power stack system have been introduced. However, there are very few studies of economic analysis for this promising system. Consequently, this study proposed 20-kW-scale high-power solid oxide electrolysis cells system configurations, then conducted economic analysis. Especially, the economic context was in South Korea. For comparison, a low-power system with similar design was used as a reference; the levelized cost of hydrogen of each system was calculated based on the revenue requirement method. Furthermore, a sensitivity analysis was also performed to identify how the economic variables affect the hydrogen production cost in a specific context. The results show that a high-power system is superior to a low-power system from an economic perspective. The stack cost is the dominant component of the capital cost, but the electricity cost is the factor that contributes the most to the hydrogen cost. In the first case study, it was found that, if a high-power system can be installed inside a nuclear power plant, the cost of hydrogen produced can reach $3.65/kg when the electricity cost is 3.28 is an element of/kWh and the stack cost is assumed to be $574/kW. The second case study indicated that the hydrogen cost can decrease by 24% if the system is scaled up to a 2-MW scale.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 37 条
  • [11] New definition of levelized cost of energy storage and its application to reversible solid oxide fuel-cell
    Giap, Van-Tien
    Lee, Young Duk
    Kim, Young Sang
    Bui, Tuananh
    Ahn, Kook Young
    [J]. ENERGY, 2022, 239
  • [12] Current developments in reversible solid oxide fuel cells
    Gomez, Sergio Yesid
    Hotza, Dachamir
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2016, 61 : 155 - 174
  • [13] Hackett GregoryA., 2018, Systems analysis of solid oxide fuel cell plant configurations
  • [14] Recent advances in solid oxide cell technology for electrolysis
    Hauch, A.
    Kungas, R.
    Blennow, P.
    Hansen, A. B.
    Hansen, J. B.
    Mathiesen, B. V.
    Mogensen, M. B.
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2020, 370 (6513) : 186 - +
  • [15] International Energy Agency (IEA), 2021, REN POW
  • [16] International Energy Agency (IEA), 2021, Key world energy statistics
  • [17] Techno-economic analysis and Monte Carlo simulation of green hydrogen production technology through various water electrolysis technologies
    Jang, Dohyung
    Kim, Jaedong
    Kim, Dongmin
    Han, Won-Bi
    Kang, Sanggyu
    [J]. ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 258
  • [18] Hybrid pumped hydro and battery storage for renewable energy based power supply system
    Javed, Muhammad Shahzad
    Zhong, Dan
    Ma, Tao
    Song, Aotian
    Ahmed, Salman
    [J]. APPLIED ENERGY, 2020, 257 (257)
  • [19] Solid Oxide Electrolysis Cells: Degradation at High Current Densities
    Knibbe, Ruth
    Traulsen, Marie Lund
    Hauch, Anne
    Ebbesen, Sune Dalgaard
    Mogensen, Mogens
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ELECTROCHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2010, 157 (08) : B1209 - B1217
  • [20] Economic evaluation with sensitivity and profitability analysis for hydrogen production from water electrolysis in Korea
    Lee, Boreum
    Chae, Heetae
    Choi, Nak Heon
    Moon, Changhwan
    Moon, Sangbong
    Lim, Hankwon
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2017, 42 (10) : 6462 - 6471