Surface drainage features identification using LiDAR DEM smoothing in agriculture area: a study case of Kebumen Regency, Indonesia

被引:5
作者
Handayani, Hepi H. [1 ]
Bawasir, Arizal [1 ]
Cahyono, Agung B. [1 ]
Hariyanto, Teguh [1 ]
Hidayat, Husnul [1 ]
机构
[1] Inst Teknol Sepuluh Nopember, Geomat Engn Dept, Campus ITS Sukolilo, Surabaya 60111, East Java, Indonesia
关键词
LiDAR DEM; feature-preserving smoothing; edge-preserving smoothing; drainage features; morphometric analysis; RESOLUTION; ROUGHNESS; NETWORKS; SCALE; SLOPE;
D O I
10.1080/19479832.2022.2076160
中图分类号
TP7 [遥感技术];
学科分类号
081102 ; 0816 ; 081602 ; 083002 ; 1404 ;
摘要
Digital Elevation Model (DEM) is the most vital data to generate drainage networks and to provide critical terrain factors and hydrologic derivatives, such as slope, aspect, and streamflow. The accuracy of generated drainage features is extensively dependent on the quality and resolution of DEM, such as LiDAR-derived DEM. Contrary, it has a high level of roughness and complexity. Thus, smoothing methods are sometimes employed to conquer the roughness. This paper presents feature-preserving DEM smoothing (FPDEM-S) and edge-preserving DEM smoothing (EPDEM-S) approaches to smooth surface complexity in kind of preserving small drainage features using the 0.5 m - resolution LiDAR DEM of the Kedungbener River area in Kebumen Regency, Indonesia. Entangling linear morphometric factors, those smoothing approaches delivered a slight difference of stream number, with the FPDEM-S stream length ratio performing 7% better tendencies. The FPDEM-S method perormed better than EPDEM-S in this study area to provide an optimal smoothed LiDAR DEM at certain parameter values. Summarising that two smoothing methods approaches performed similar characteristics of watershed as an oval structure close to the circular shape. Also, it can be revealed that the watershed did not reach maturity phase.
引用
收藏
页码:182 / 203
页数:22
相关论文
共 59 条
[2]  
Brock JC, 2009, J COASTAL RES, V25, P1, DOI [10.2112/SI53-001.1, 10.2112/S153-001.1]
[3]  
Brubaker K M., 2013, APPL ENVIRON SOIL SC, V2013, DOI DOI 10.1155/2013/891534
[4]   Comparison of drainage-constrained methods for DEM generalization [J].
Chen, Yumin ;
Wilson, John P. ;
Zhu, Quansheng ;
Zhou, Qiming .
COMPUTERS & GEOSCIENCES, 2012, 48 :41-49
[5]   DEM resolution dependencies of terrain attributes across a landscape [J].
Deng, Y. ;
Wilson, J. P. ;
Bauer, B. O. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION SCIENCE, 2007, 21 (1-2) :187-213
[6]  
Esri, 2020, ARC HYDRO GIS WATER
[7]   Edge-preserving decompositions for multi-scale tone and detail manipulation [J].
Farbman, Zeev ;
Fattal, Raanan ;
Lischinski, Dani ;
Szeliski, Richard .
ACM TRANSACTIONS ON GRAPHICS, 2008, 27 (03)
[8]  
G├a┬Akg├a┬Az, 2006, 10 INT SPECIALISED C, P18
[9]  
Gallant John C., 2011, Geomorphometry, P37
[10]  
GARNICA C, 2000, INT ARCH PHOTOGRAM 3, V33, P320