Cost-effectiveness of pembrolizumab for previously treated MSI-H/dMMR solid tumours in the UK

被引:0
作者
Mccarthy, Grant [1 ,7 ]
Young, Kate [2 ]
Madin-Warburton, Matthew [3 ]
Mantaian, Tyler [4 ]
Brook, Elizabeth [3 ]
Metcalfe, Kaylie [3 ]
Mikelson, Jan [5 ]
Xu, Ruifeng [2 ]
Seyla-Hammer, Carl [1 ]
Aguiar-Ibanez, Raquel [6 ]
Amonkar, Mayur [2 ]
机构
[1] MSD UK Ltd, London, England
[2] Merck & Co Inc, Rahway, NJ USA
[3] Lumanity, London, England
[4] Lumanity, Las Vegas, NV USA
[5] MSD, Zurich, Switzerland
[6] Merck Canada Inc, Kirkland, PQ, Canada
[7] Merck & Co Inc, 126 E Lincoln Ave, Rahway, NJ 07065 USA
关键词
Microsatellite instability; mismatch repair deficient; economic analysis; cost-effectiveness; pembrolizumab; multi-tumour; histology-independent; D61; D6; D; H51; H5; H; MISMATCH-REPAIR; MICROSATELLITE INSTABILITY; COLORECTAL-CANCER; GUIDELINE; TRIALS;
D O I
10.1080/13696998.2024.2311507
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
ObjectivesPatients with previously treated microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H)/mismatch repair deficient (dMMR) tumours have limited chemotherapeutic treatment options. Pembrolizumab received approval from the EMA in 2022 for the treatment of colorectal, endometrial, gastric, small intestine, and biliary MSI-H/dMMR tumour types. This approval was supported by data from the KEYNOTE-164 and KEYNOTE-158 clinical trials. This study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of pembrolizumab compared with standard of care (SoC) for previously treated MSI-H/dMMR solid tumours in line with the approved EMA label from a UK healthcare payer perspective.MethodsA multi-tumour partitioned survival model was built consisting of pre-progression, progressed disease, and dead health states. Pembrolizumab survival outcomes were extrapolated using Bayesian hierarchical models (BHMs) fitted to pooled data from KEYNOTE-164 and KEYNOTE-158. Comparator outcomes were informed by published sources. Tumour sites were modelled independently and then combined, weighted by tumour site distribution. A SoC comparator was used to formulate the overall cost-effectiveness result with pembrolizumab as the intervention. SoC comprised a weighted average of the comparators by tumour site based on market share. Drug acquisition, administration, adverse events, monitoring, subsequent treatment, end-of-life costs, and testing costs were included. Sensitivity and scenario analyses were performed, including modelling pembrolizumab efficacy using standard parametric survival models.ResultsPembrolizumab, at list price, was associated with 129,469 pound in total costs, 8.30 LYs, and 3.88 QALYs across the pooled tumour sites. SoC was associated with 28,222 pound in total costs, 1.14 LYs, and 0.72 QALYs across the pooled tumour sites. This yields an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of 32,085 pound per QALY. Results were robust to sensitivity and scenario analyses.ConclusionsThis model demonstrates pembrolizumab provides a valuable new alternative therapy for UK patients with MSH-H/dMMR cancer at the cost of 32,085 pound per QALY, with confidential discounts anticipated to improve cost-effectiveness further.
引用
收藏
页码:279 / 291
页数:13
相关论文
共 49 条
  • [1] Cost-effectiveness of pembrolizumab for the first-line treatment of patients with unresectable or metastatic MSI-H/dMMR colorectal cancer in the United States
    Aguiar-Ibanez, Raquel
    Hardern, Chloe
    van Hees, Frank
    Lee, Dawn
    Patel, Anubhav
    Chhabra, Nitika
    Baluni, Gargi
    Amonkar, Mayur
    Lai, Yizhen
    Xu, Ruifeng
    Massaad, Rachid
    Fogelman, David
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ECONOMICS, 2022, 25 (01) : 469 - 480
  • [2] Bellone M, 2019, Value Health, V22, pS464, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.JVAL.2019.09.343
  • [3] Benson AB., 2021, J Natl Compr Canc Netw, V19, P329, DOI DOI 10.6004/JNCCN.2021.0012
  • [4] Small Bowel Adenocarcinoma Version 1.2020
    Benson, Al B., III
    Venook, Alan P.
    Al-Hawary, Mahmoud M.
    Arain, Mustafa A.
    Chen, Yi-Jen
    Ciombor, Kristen K.
    Cohen, Stacey A.
    Cooper, Harry S.
    Deming, Dustin A.
    Garrido-Laguna, Ignacio
    Grem, Jean L.
    Hoffe, Sarah E.
    Hubbard, Joleen
    Hunt, Steven
    Kamel, Ahmed
    Kirilcuk, Natalie
    Krishnamurthi, Smitha
    Messersmith, Wells A.
    Meyerhardt, Jeffrey
    Miller, Eric D.
    Mulcahy, Mary F.
    Nurkin, Steven
    Overman, Michael J.
    Parikh, Aparna
    Patel, Hitendra
    Pedersen, Katrina S.
    Saltz, Leonard B.
    Schneider, Charles
    Shibata, David
    Skibber, John M.
    Sofocleous, Constantinos T.
    Stoffel, Elena M.
    Stotsky-Himelfarb, Eden
    Willett, Christopher G.
    Johnson-Chilla, Alyse
    Gregory, Kristina M.
    Gurski, Lisa A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL COMPREHENSIVE CANCER NETWORK, 2019, 17 (09): : 1109 - 1133
  • [5] Comparison of Alternative Methods to Assess the Cost-Effectiveness of Tumor-Agnostic Therapies: A Triangulation Approach Using Larotrectinib as a Case Study
    Briggs, Andrew
    Wehler, Beth
    Gaultney, Jennifer G.
    Upton, Alex
    Italiano, Antoine
    Bokemeyer, Carsten
    Paracha, Noman
    Sullivan, Sean D.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2022, 25 (06) : 1002 - 1009
  • [6] Cancer Research UK, Small intestine cancer incidence
  • [7] Cancer Research UK, 2022, Bowel cancer incidence by sex and UK region
  • [8] Cancer Research UK, Uterine cancer incidence by sex and UK region
  • [9] Cancer Research UK, 2022, Stomach cancer incidence
  • [10] City and Guilds, 2019, Unit Costs of Health and Social Care 2019