Household water insecurities and willingness to pay in Karachi

被引:0
|
作者
Khalil, Sana [1 ]
Bader Sheikh, Sahaab [2 ]
Jamal, Ubaidullah [3 ]
Khan, Hassaan Furqan [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington Tacoma, Tacoma, WA 98402 USA
[2] Habib Univ, Sch Arts Humanities & Social Sci, Karachi, Pakistan
[3] Interact Res & Dev IRD, Maternal & Child Hlth, Karachi, Pakistan
[4] Tufts Univ, Dept Urban & Environm Policy & Planning, Medford, MA USA
关键词
Inequalities; Water insecurity; Water policy; Water resource management; Willingness to pay; CONTINGENT VALUATION SURVEY; DRINKING-WATER; HYPOTHETICAL BIAS; SERVICES; ACCESS; INDIA;
D O I
10.2166/wp.2023.149
中图分类号
TV21 [水资源调查与水利规划];
学科分类号
081501 ;
摘要
This study highlights various challenges faced by households in accessing safe and reliable water in Karachi, Pakistan's largest city. Using data collected from a stratified random sample of 990 households across Karachi's six districts in 2021-2022, our findings reveal disparities in pipeline coverage, sewage mixing, and water supply. Pipeline coverage is the highest in high-income neighborhoods (99%) and the lowest in low-income areas (71%). Low-income households experience more sewage mixing (76%) than high-income households (55.38%). Overall, 60% of households report frequent sewage mixing, and 30% have had someone in their household contract a water-borne illness in the last 6 months. Approximately half of the households are dissatisfied with water service, with a median daily water supply of just 8 min (equivalent to 56 minutes per week). We find that households that received some water supply in the past month are 11% more likely to pay their bills. Nevertheless, households demonstrate a substantial willingness to pay (WTP) for improvements in the piped water system. The median monthly WTP is PKR 500 for low-income households, PKR 1,000 for middle-income households, and PKR 1,700 for high-income households. Our analysis emphasizes the importance of income-sensitive interventions in urban water supply management in the Global South.
引用
收藏
页码:1139 / 1160
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Household willingness to pay equals individual willingness to pay if and only if the household income pools
    Munro, A
    ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2005, 88 (02) : 227 - 230
  • [2] Willingness to pay: Individual or household?
    Delaney L.
    O'Toole F.
    Journal of Cultural Economics, 2006, 30 (4) : 305 - 309
  • [3] Tariff structure and willingness to pay: case of Karachi
    Ahmed, Noman
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF CIVIL ENGINEERS-MUNICIPAL ENGINEER, 2013, 166 (01) : 45 - 52
  • [4] Household's willingness to pay for arsenic safe drinking water in Bangladesh
    Khan, Nasreen Islam
    Brouwer, Roy
    Yang, Hong
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2014, 143 : 151 - 161
  • [5] Household willingness to pay for dropoff recycling
    Tiller, KH
    Jakus, PM
    Park, WM
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 1997, 22 (02): : 310 - 320
  • [6] Adapting to Less Water: Household Willingness to Pay for Decentralised Water Systems in Urban Australia
    Tapsuwan, Sorada
    Burton, Michael
    Mankad, Aditi
    Tucker, David
    Greenhill, Murni
    WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2014, 28 (04) : 1111 - 1125
  • [7] Adapting to Less Water: Household Willingness to Pay for Decentralised Water Systems in Urban Australia
    Sorada Tapsuwan
    Michael Burton
    Aditi Mankad
    David Tucker
    Murni Greenhill
    Water Resources Management, 2014, 28 : 1111 - 1125
  • [8] Household willingness to pay for improved rural water supplies: A comparison of four sites
    Piper, S
    Martin, WE
    WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 1997, 33 (09) : 2153 - 2163
  • [9] Derived willingness-to-pay for household water use with price and probabilistic supply
    Alcubilla, Roberto Garcia
    Lund, Jay R.
    JOURNAL OF WATER RESOURCES PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT-ASCE, 2006, 132 (06): : 424 - 433
  • [10] Water pricing with household surveys: A study of acceptability and willingness to pay in Chongqing, China
    Wang, Hua
    Xie, Jian
    Li, Honglin
    CHINA ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2010, 21 (01) : 136 - 149