EXPLORING THE FORMATION MECHANISM OF TECHNOLOGY STANDARD COMPETITIVENESS IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE INDUSTRY: A FUZZY-SET QUALITATIVE COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

被引:2
作者
Liu, Siwei [1 ]
Zhou, Lijun [1 ]
Yang, Jing [1 ]
机构
[1] China Jiliang Univ, Coll Econ & Management, Hangzhou, Peoples R China
关键词
technology standardization; artificial intelligence industry; fsQCA; technology-organization-environment (TOE) framework; technology standard competitiveness; configurations; EMPIRICAL-EVIDENCE; ORGANIZATIONAL ADOPTION; POLITICAL-ECONOMY; INNOVATION; CHINA; ENVIRONMENT; STRATEGIES; GOVERNMENT; PARTICIPATION; PERSPECTIVES;
D O I
10.3846/jbem.2023.18845
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This study aims to reveal the complex mechanism influencing technology standard competitiveness (TSC) in the artificial intelligence industry. Compared with research using traditional linear models, this research adopts the fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) method to obtain the multiple equivalent paths for different factors that jointly produce TSC. The sample of this study involves 32 countries, and the research framework is constructed from the technological, organizational, and environmental aspects of the phenomenon. The fsQCA method was used to demonstrate the asymmetric relationship between cause and effect. The results indicate four configuration paths but no necessary conditions leading to TSC. Academic research intensity and market size play vital roles in developing TSC. Some logically complementary relationships exist between organizational participation, technological innovation ability, and international competitive pressure. These findings are helpful for policymakers in their formulation of artificial intelligence- related strategies.
引用
收藏
页码:653 / 675
页数:23
相关论文
共 111 条
[91]   A roadmap for applying qualitative comparative analysis in supply chain research The reverse supply chain case [J].
Russo, Ivan ;
Confente, Ilenia ;
Gligor, David ;
Cobelli, Nicola .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL DISTRIBUTION & LOGISTICS MANAGEMENT, 2019, 49 (01) :99-120
[92]  
Schneider CQ, 2012, STRAT SOC INQ, P1
[93]   Mapping the institutional capital of high-tech firms: A fuzzy-set analysis of capitalist variety and export performance [J].
Schneider, Martin R. ;
Schulze-Bentrop, Conrad ;
Paunescu, Mihai .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS STUDIES, 2010, 41 (02) :246-266
[94]   Standardization revisited: A critical literature review on standards and innovation [J].
Shin, Dong-Hee ;
Kim, Hongbum ;
Hwang, Junseok .
COMPUTER STANDARDS & INTERFACES, 2015, 38 :152-157
[95]   Artificial intelligence empowerment: The impact of research and development investment on green radical innovation in high-tech enterprises [J].
Su, Huishuang ;
Qu, Xintong ;
Tian, Shuo ;
Ma, Qiang ;
Li, Ling ;
Chen, Yong .
SYSTEMS RESEARCH AND BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE, 2022, 39 (03) :489-502
[96]  
Tornatzky LG, 1990, Processes of Technological Innovation
[97]   Patent analysis for technology development of artificial intelligence: A country-level comparative study [J].
Tseng, Chun-Yao ;
Ting, Ping-Ho .
INNOVATION-ORGANIZATION & MANAGEMENT, 2013, 15 (04) :463-475
[98]   RADICAL INNOVATION AND CORPORATE REGENERATION [J].
UTTERBACK, JM .
RESEARCH-TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT, 1994, 37 (04) :10-10
[99]   LED standardization in China and South East Asia: Stakeholders, infrastructure and institutional regimes [J].
van de Kaa, Geerten ;
Greeven, Mark .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2017, 72 :863-870
[100]   The impact of participation within formal standardization on firm performance [J].
Wakke, Paul ;
Blind, Knut ;
Ramel, Florian .
JOURNAL OF PRODUCTIVITY ANALYSIS, 2016, 45 (03) :317-330