Good behavior game - study protocol for a randomized controlled trial of a preventive behavior management program in a Swedish school context

被引:0
作者
Djamnezhad, Dariush [1 ,2 ]
Bergstrom, Martin [3 ]
Andren, Per [4 ,5 ]
Hofvander, Bjorn [1 ,6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Lund Univ, Dept Clin Sci Lund, Lund Clin Res Externalizing & Dev Psychopathol, Lund, Sweden
[2] Adm Compulsory Educ Dept, Malmo, Sweden
[3] Lund Univ, Sch Social Work, Lund, Sweden
[4] Lund Univ, Dept Clin Sci Lund, Lund, Sweden
[5] Child & Adolescent Psychiat Skane, Lund, Sweden
[6] Reg Skane, Dept Forens Psychiat, Kristianstad, Sweden
[7] Univ Gothenburg, Ctr Eth Law & Mental Hlth, Dept Psychiat & Neurochem, Gothenburg, Sweden
关键词
good behavior game; study protocol; behavior management; randomized controlled trial; school-based intervention; prevention; conduct problems; pragmatic trial; CONDUCT PROBLEMS; DISRUPTIVE BEHAVIOR; MENTAL-HEALTH; INTERVENTION; OUTCOMES; IMPACT; TRAJECTORIES; CHILDHOOD; IMPLEMENTATION; 1ST-GRADE;
D O I
10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1256714
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Background: Early conduct problems and school failure are prominent risk factors for several adverse outcomes in later life. With the potential of reaching many children at early stages of their life, school-based interventions constitute a valuable approach to universal prevention. Good behavior game (GBG) is a promising school-based behavior management program, having shown immediate reductions in conduct problems along with several long-term positive effects. Adapting interventions to new contexts may however affect their effectiveness. The current study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of a Swedish adaption of GBG under pragmatic conditions. The intervention is hypothesized to reduce conduct problems in the classroom (primary outcome). Secondary analyses will investigate changes in conduct problems in common school areas, classroom climate, teacher collective efficacy, on-task behavior, as well as investigating behavioral management practices, implementation, and barriers to implementation. Methods: This is a cluster-randomized trial with two parallel groups. Schools will be randomized (1,1, stratified by their areas sociodemographic index score) to be provided training in GBG or perform business-as-usual. The intervention and data collection lasts for a school year. Data will be collected at three time points: at baseline in the beginning of the school year (prior to training in GBG), after three months, and after nine months (at the end of the school year; primary endpoint). Data consists of teacher-rated measures of conduct problems, classroom climate, teacher collective efficacy, behavior management practices, and implementation factors, along with demographic factors. In addition, data will be collected by independent and blinded observers using corresponding measures in a subset of randomly chosen classrooms. Procedural fidelity will be rated and collected by GBG-trainers during nine observations throughout the school year. Statistical analysis will include frequentist intention-to-treat analysis, and comparisons of estimates with a corresponding Bayesian model using weakly informative priors. The study has currently completed data collection. Discussion: This study will provide knowledge in universal prevention and school-based interventions with high reach, as well as specific knowledge concerning the effectiveness of an adapted version of GBG under real-world conditions, along with factors affecting its implementation and effects.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]  
Albee G.W., 1998, Journal of Mental Health, V7, P441
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1980, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, V3rd, DOI [DOI 10.1176/APPI.BOOKS.9780890425787, DOI 10.1176/APPI.BOOKS.9780890425596]
[3]   Game Over? No Main or Subgroup Effects of the Good Behavior Game in a Randomized Trial in English Primary Schools [J].
Ashworth, Emma ;
Humphrey, Neil ;
Hennessey, Alexandra .
JOURNAL OF RESEARCH ON EDUCATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS, 2020, 13 (02) :298-321
[4]   Differentiating Early-Onset Persistent Versus Childhood-Limited Conduct Problem Youth [J].
Barker, Edward D. ;
Maughan, Barbara .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2009, 166 (08) :900-908
[5]   GOOD BEHAVIOR GAME - EFFECTS OF INDIVIDUAL CONTINGENCIES FOR GROUP CONSEQUENCES ON DISRUPTIVE BEHAVIOR IN A CLASSROOM [J].
BARRISH, HH ;
SAUNDERS, M ;
WOLF, MM .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS, 1969, 2 (02) :119-&
[6]   Conduct problems trajectories and psychosocial outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Bevilacqua, Leonardo ;
Hale, Daniel ;
Barker, Edward D. ;
Viner, Russell .
EUROPEAN CHILD & ADOLESCENT PSYCHIATRY, 2018, 27 (10) :1239-1260
[7]  
Bierman KL, 1999, J CONSULT CLIN PSYCH, V67, P648
[8]   An Overview of Research and Evaluation Designs for Dissemination and Implementation [J].
Brown, C. Hendricks ;
Curran, Geoffrey ;
Palinkas, Lawrence A. ;
Aarons, Gregory A. ;
Wells, Kenneth B. ;
Jones, Loretta ;
Collins, Linda M. ;
Duan, Naihua ;
Mittman, Brian S. ;
Wallace, Andrea ;
Tabak, Rachel G. ;
Ducharme, Lori ;
Chambers, David A. ;
Neta, Gila ;
Wiley, Tisha ;
Landsverk, John ;
Cheung, Ken ;
Cruden, Gracelyn .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PUBLIC HEALTH, VOL 38, 2017, 38 :1-22
[9]   Consort 2010 statement: extension to cluster randomised trials [J].
Campbell, Marion K. ;
Piaggio, Gilda ;
Elbourne, Diana R. ;
Altman, Douglas G. .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2012, 345
[10]  
Cataldo MF., 1973, American Psychological Association, P1