Current research trends on cognition, integrative complexity, and decision-making: a systematic literature review using activity theory and neuroscience

被引:1
作者
Molina, Isaac [1 ]
Molina-Perez, Edmundo [1 ]
Sobrino, Fernanda [1 ]
Tellez-Rojas, Mario Arturo [2 ]
Zamora-Maldonado, Hilda C. [1 ]
Plaza-Ferreira, Maria [1 ]
Orozco, Yessica [1 ]
Espinoza-Juarez, Victor [1 ]
Serra-Barragan, Luis [1 ]
De Unanue, Adolfo [1 ]
机构
[1] Tecnol Monterrey, Sch Govt & Publ Transformat, Mexico City, Mexico
[2] Univ Nacl Autonoma Mexico, Fac Higher Educ Iztacala, Mexico City, Mexico
来源
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY | 2023年 / 14卷
关键词
cognition; integrative complexity; decision-making; activity theory (AT); systematic review; MANAGEMENT; CHALLENGES; PSYCHOLOGY; IDEOLOGY; MODEL; SCALE; TASK;
D O I
10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1156696
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Introduction: This article presents a systematic literature review that follows the PRISMA and PICOS guidelines to analyze current research trends on cognition, integrative complexity (IC) (a cognitive feature focusing on information processing in a person's response rather than its quantity or quality), and decision-making from the perspectives of activity theory and neuroscience.Methods: The study examines 31 papers published between 2012 and 2022 and 19 articles specifically related to neuroscience. We performed a content analysis using six categories within activity theory: subjects, objects, rules, community, division of labor, and outcomes.Results: The study investigates the relationship between decision-making outcomes and IC as a cognitive feature in various contexts. Additionally, content analysis on neuroscience and IC revealed significant research gaps, including understanding the nature of IC, challenges related to its measurement, and differentiation from other cognitive features. We also identify opportunities for investigating the brain's activity during decision-making in relation to IC.Discussion: We address the need for a more precise categorization of IC in studies of cognition, IC, and decision-making. We discuss the implications of our analysis for understanding the cognitive nature of IC and the potential of neuroscience methods for studying this attribute.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 82 条
[1]   Accountable for What? The Effect of Accountability Standard Specification on Decision-Making Behavior in the Public Sector [J].
Aleksovska, Marija .
PUBLIC PERFORMANCE & MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2021, 44 (04) :707-734
[2]   The Personalities of Presidents as Independent Variables [J].
Arana Araya, Ignacio .
POLITICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 42 (04) :695-712
[3]  
Baba M. M., 2018, J. Organ. Hum. Behav, V7, P23
[4]  
Baker-Brown G., 2008, Motivation and personality: Handbook of thematic content analysis, P401, DOI [10.1017/CBO9780511527937, DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511527937]
[5]   Majority and Minority Subgroup Argumentation Messages [J].
Beck, Stephenson J. .
COMMUNICATION REPORTS, 2019, 32 (02) :69-81
[6]   When the killing has been done: Exploring associations of personality with third-party judgment and punishment of homicides in moral dilemma scenarios [J].
Behnke, Alexander ;
Strobel, Anja ;
Armbruster, Diana .
PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (06)
[7]  
Bekes V., 2019, Encyclopedia of personality and individual differences
[8]  
Bloemen P.J.T.M., 2019, DECISION MAKING DEEP
[9]   Group-level integrative complexity: Enhancing differentiation and integration in group decision-making [J].
Brodbeck, Felix C. ;
Kugler, Katharina G. ;
Fischer, Josef A. ;
Heinze, Joerg ;
Fischer, Dorothee .
GROUP PROCESSES & INTERGROUP RELATIONS, 2021, 24 (01) :125-144
[10]  
Carter AB, 2017, SOC PERSONAL PSYCHOL, V11, DOI 10.1111/spc3.12313