Prospective, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, active-controlled, phase 3 clinical trial comparing the safety and efficacy of intranasal dexmedetomidine to oral midazolam as premedication for propofol sedation in pediatric patients undergoing magnetic resonance imaging: the MIDEX MRI trial

被引:2
作者
Wabelo, Olivia Nzungu [1 ,2 ]
Schmartz, Denis [2 ,3 ]
Giancursio, Mario [1 ]
De Pooter, Francoise [1 ]
Caruso, Giulia [1 ]
Fils, Jean-Francois [4 ]
Van der Linden, Philippe [5 ]
机构
[1] Hop Univ Enfants Reine Fabiola, Hop Univ Bruxelles, Dept Anesthesiol, Brussels, Belgium
[2] Univ Libre Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
[3] Hop Erasme, Hop Univ Bruxelles, Dept Anesthesiol, Brussels, Belgium
[4] Ars Statistica, Nivelles, Belgium
[5] Grand Hop Charleroi, Dept Anesthesiol, Charleroi, Belgium
关键词
MRI; Pediatric sedation; Midazolam; Dexmedetomidine; PROCEDURAL SEDATION; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; CHILDREN;
D O I
10.1186/s13063-023-07529-0
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Background Children under 6 years who need magnetic resonance imaging usually require sedation to obtain best quality images, but the optimal sedation protocol remains to be determined. In 2018, we showed a 22% interruption in image acquisition during magnetic resonance imaging when performing a propofol-based sedation using a bolus approach. As non-pharmacological premedication is often insufficient to reduce the anxiety of children related to parental separation, pharmacological premedication may be useful to facilitate the induction of anesthesia. In our institution, effective premedication is obtained oral intake of midazolam, though its administration relies on patients' compliance and could also lead to paradoxical reaction. Dexmedetomidine has a safe profile in the pediatric population and can therefore represent an interesting alternative. The primary objective of this trial is to demonstrate the superiority of intranasal dexmedetomidine compared to oral midazolam as premedication in reducing the occurrence of any event requiring temporary or definitive interruption of the examination to allow anesthesiologist intervention in children undergoing magnetic resonance imaging under propofol sedation. Methods In this single-center, prospective, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, active comparator-controlled, superiority trial, we planned to include 250 patients, aged 6 months to 6 years, undergoing a scheduled magnetic resonance imaging requiring the presence of an anesthesiologist. After informed consent, the patients will be randomized to receive either oral midazolam or intranasal dexmedetomidine as premedication. The data will be analyzed in intention to treat, using Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z, chi-square, Wilcoxon, and Mann-Whitney U tests. A P-value < 0.05 will be considered statistically significant. Discussion The MIDEX MRI study will assess the efficacy of intranasal dexmedetomidine compared to oral midazolam to improve the quality of a propofol-based sedation prior to magnetic resonance imaging, without negative repercussion on the postoperative period.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [21] Effect of different doses of esketamine compared with fentanyl combined with propofol on hypotension in patients undergoing painless abortion surgery: a prospective, randomized, double-blind controlled clinical trial
    Chen, Jiejuan
    Zou, Xiaohua
    Hu, Bailong
    Yang, Yang
    Wang, Feng
    Zhou, Qian
    Shen, Minhuan
    BMC ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [22] Efficacy and safety of dexmedetomidine for prevention of withdrawal syndrome in the pediatric intensive care unit: protocol for an adaptive, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, non-profit clinical trial
    Mondardini, Maria Cristina
    Sperotto, Francesca
    Daverio, Marco
    Caramelli, Fabio
    Gregori, Dario
    Caligiuri, Maria Francesca
    Vitale, Francesca
    Cecini, Maria Teresa
    Piastra, Marco
    Mancino, Aldo
    Pettenazzo, Andrea
    Conti, Giorgio
    Amigoni, Angela
    TRIALS, 2019, 20 (01)
  • [23] Immunogenicity and safety of a live attenuated varicella vaccine in healthy subjects aged between 13 to 55 years: a double-blind, randomized, active-controlled phase III clinical trial in China
    Zhang, Yang
    Wang, Shiyuan
    Li, Guifan
    Shi, Jinhui
    Chang, Xianyun
    Zhang, Hao
    Zhu, Fengcai
    Li, Jingxin
    Pan, Hongxing
    Sun, Jinfang
    EXPERT REVIEW OF VACCINES, 2025, 24 (01) : 157 - 164
  • [24] Efficacy and safety of dexmedetomidine for prevention of withdrawal syndrome in the pediatric intensive care unit: protocol for an adaptive, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, non-profit clinical trial
    Maria Cristina Mondardini
    Francesca Sperotto
    Marco Daverio
    Fabio Caramelli
    Dario Gregori
    Maria Francesca Caligiuri
    Francesca Vitale
    Maria Teresa Cecini
    Marco Piastra
    Aldo Mancino
    Andrea Pettenazzo
    Giorgio Conti
    Angela Amigoni
    Trials, 20
  • [25] Efficacy and Safety of AR101 in Oral Immunotherapy for Peanut Allergy: Results of ARC001, a Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Phase 2 Clinical Trial
    Bird, J. Andrew
    Spergel, Jonathan M.
    Jones, Stacie M.
    Rachid, Rima
    Assa'ad, Amal H.
    Wang, Julie
    Leonard, Stephanie A.
    Laubach, Susan S.
    Kim, Edwin H.
    Vickery, Brian P.
    Davis, Benjamin P.
    Heimall, Jennifer
    Cianferoni, Antonella
    MacGinnitie, Andrew J.
    Crestani, Elena
    Burks, A. Wesley
    JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY-IN PRACTICE, 2018, 6 (02) : 476 - +
  • [26] Safety and efficacy of aprotinin versus tranexamic acid for reducing absolute blood loss and transfusion in pediatric patients undergoing craniosynostosis surgery: a randomized, double-blind, three-arm controlled trial
    Soltani, Zahra Ebrahim
    Hanaei, Sara
    Ohadi, Mohammad Amin Dabbagh
    Maroufi, Seyed Farzad
    Meybodi, Keyvan Tayebi
    Khademi, Sima
    Yaghmaei, Bahareh
    Soltani, Alireza Ebrahim
    Nejat, Farideh
    Habibi, Zohreh
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-PEDIATRICS, 2022, 29 (05) : 551 - 559
  • [27] The Efficacy and Safety of Diazepam for Intraoperative Blood Pressure Stabilization in Hypertensive Patients Undergoing Vitrectomy Under Nerve Block Anesthesia: A Prospective, Single-Center, Double-Blind, Randomized, Controlled Trial
    Qian, Tianwei
    Gong, Qiaoyun
    Shu, Yiyang
    Shen, Hangqi
    Wu, Xia
    Wang, Weijun
    Zhang, Zhihua
    Cao, Hui
    Xu, Xun
    THERAPEUTICS AND CLINICAL RISK MANAGEMENT, 2024, 20 : 9 - 18
  • [28] Baloxavir Marboxil Single-dose Treatment in Influenza-infected Children A Randomized, Double-blind, Active Controlled Phase 3 Safety and Efficacy Trial (miniSTONE-2)
    Baker, Jeffrey
    Block, Stanley L.
    Matharu, Balpreet
    Burleigh Macutkiewicz, Laura
    Wildum, Steffen
    Dimonaco, Sophie
    Collinson, Neil
    Clinch, Barry
    Piedra, Pedro A.
    PEDIATRIC INFECTIOUS DISEASE JOURNAL, 2020, 39 (08) : 700 - 705
  • [29] Immunogenicity and safety of an egg culture-based quadrivalent inactivated non-adjuvanted subunit influenza vaccine in subjects ≥3 years: A randomized, multicenter, double-blind, active-controlled phase III, non-inferiority trial
    Zhang, Yuhui
    Wang, Yanxia
    Jia, Chunyu
    Li, Guangfu
    Zhang, Wei
    Li, Qin
    Chen, Xiaofen
    Leng, Wenna
    Huang, Lili
    Xie, Zhiqiang
    Zhang, Huiping
    You, Wangyang
    An, Rui
    Jiang, Hongyan
    Zhao, Xue
    Cheng, Siyan
    Tan, Jiebing
    Cui, Weiyang
    Gao, Feilong
    Lu, Weifeng
    Wang, Yuping
    Yang, Yongli
    Xia, Shengli
    Wang, Shuai
    VACCINE, 2022, 40 (34) : 4933 - 4941
  • [30] Design of the DOVE (Determining Effects of Platelet Inhibition on Vaso-Occlusive Events) Trial: A Global Phase 3 Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Prasugrel in Pediatric Patients With Sickle Cell Anemia Utilizing a Dose Titration Strategy
    Hoppe, Carolyn C.
    Styles, Lori
    Heath, Lori E.
    Zhou, Chunmei
    Jakubowski, Joseph A.
    Winters, Kenneth J.
    Brown, Patricia B.
    Rees, David C.
    Heeney, Matthew M.
    PEDIATRIC BLOOD & CANCER, 2016, 63 (02) : 299 - 305