Prospective, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, active-controlled, phase 3 clinical trial comparing the safety and efficacy of intranasal dexmedetomidine to oral midazolam as premedication for propofol sedation in pediatric patients undergoing magnetic resonance imaging: the MIDEX MRI trial

被引:2
作者
Wabelo, Olivia Nzungu [1 ,2 ]
Schmartz, Denis [2 ,3 ]
Giancursio, Mario [1 ]
De Pooter, Francoise [1 ]
Caruso, Giulia [1 ]
Fils, Jean-Francois [4 ]
Van der Linden, Philippe [5 ]
机构
[1] Hop Univ Enfants Reine Fabiola, Hop Univ Bruxelles, Dept Anesthesiol, Brussels, Belgium
[2] Univ Libre Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
[3] Hop Erasme, Hop Univ Bruxelles, Dept Anesthesiol, Brussels, Belgium
[4] Ars Statistica, Nivelles, Belgium
[5] Grand Hop Charleroi, Dept Anesthesiol, Charleroi, Belgium
关键词
MRI; Pediatric sedation; Midazolam; Dexmedetomidine; PROCEDURAL SEDATION; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; CHILDREN;
D O I
10.1186/s13063-023-07529-0
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Background Children under 6 years who need magnetic resonance imaging usually require sedation to obtain best quality images, but the optimal sedation protocol remains to be determined. In 2018, we showed a 22% interruption in image acquisition during magnetic resonance imaging when performing a propofol-based sedation using a bolus approach. As non-pharmacological premedication is often insufficient to reduce the anxiety of children related to parental separation, pharmacological premedication may be useful to facilitate the induction of anesthesia. In our institution, effective premedication is obtained oral intake of midazolam, though its administration relies on patients' compliance and could also lead to paradoxical reaction. Dexmedetomidine has a safe profile in the pediatric population and can therefore represent an interesting alternative. The primary objective of this trial is to demonstrate the superiority of intranasal dexmedetomidine compared to oral midazolam as premedication in reducing the occurrence of any event requiring temporary or definitive interruption of the examination to allow anesthesiologist intervention in children undergoing magnetic resonance imaging under propofol sedation. Methods In this single-center, prospective, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, active comparator-controlled, superiority trial, we planned to include 250 patients, aged 6 months to 6 years, undergoing a scheduled magnetic resonance imaging requiring the presence of an anesthesiologist. After informed consent, the patients will be randomized to receive either oral midazolam or intranasal dexmedetomidine as premedication. The data will be analyzed in intention to treat, using Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z, chi-square, Wilcoxon, and Mann-Whitney U tests. A P-value < 0.05 will be considered statistically significant. Discussion The MIDEX MRI study will assess the efficacy of intranasal dexmedetomidine compared to oral midazolam to improve the quality of a propofol-based sedation prior to magnetic resonance imaging, without negative repercussion on the postoperative period.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]   Bioavailability of dexmedetomidine after extravascular doses in healthy subjects [J].
Anttila, M ;
Penttilä, J ;
Helminen, A ;
Vuorilehto, L ;
Scheinin, H .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2003, 56 (06) :691-693
[2]   Options and Considerations for Procedural Sedation in Pediatric Imaging [J].
Berkenbosch, John W. .
PEDIATRIC DRUGS, 2015, 17 (05) :385-399
[3]   Consensus-Based Recommendations for Standardizing Terminology and Reporting Adverse Events for Emergency Department Procedural Sedation and Analgesia in Children [J].
Bhatt, Maala ;
Kennedy, Robert M. ;
Osmond, Martin H. ;
Krauss, Baruch ;
McAllister, John D. ;
Ansermino, J. Mark ;
Evered, Lisa M. ;
Roback, Mark G. .
ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2009, 53 (04) :426-435
[4]   Behavioral Analysis of Children's Response to Induction of Anesthesia [J].
Chorney, Jill MacLaren ;
Kain, Zeev N. .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2009, 109 (05) :1434-1440
[5]   Guidelines for Monitoring and Management of Pediatric Patients Before, During, and After Sedation for Diagnostic and Therapeutic Procedures: Update 2016 [J].
Cote, Charles J. ;
Wilson, Stephen .
PEDIATRICS, 2016, 138 (01)
[6]   Progress in Pediatric Sedation Research [J].
Cravero, Joseph P. .
CLINICAL PEDIATRIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2010, 11 (04) :282-289
[7]  
de Rover I, 2023, BR J ANESTH, V130, P5173
[8]   Comparison of oral midazolam with intranasal dexmedetomidine premedication for children undergoing CT imaging: a randomized, double-blind, and controlled study [J].
Ghai, Babita ;
Jain, Kajal ;
Saxena, Akshay Kumar ;
Bhatia, Nidhi ;
Sodhi, Kushaljit Singh .
PEDIATRIC ANESTHESIA, 2017, 27 (01) :37-44
[9]  
Gupta Ayushi, 2017, J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol, V33, P236, DOI 10.4103/joacp.JOACP_204_16
[10]  
Gutmann A., 2006, PAEDIAT ANAESTH MARS, V16, P26674