Development and validation of a prediction model for the diagnosis of breast cancer based on clinical and ultrasonic features

被引:5
作者
He, Xuan [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Lu, Yuanyuan [1 ,2 ]
Li, Junlai [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Peoples Liberat Army Gen Hosp, Dept Ultrasound, Med Ctr 2, 28 Fuxing Rd, Beijing 100853, Peoples R China
[2] Natl Clin Res Ctr Geriatr Dis, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Chinese PLA Med Sch, Beijing, Peoples R China
关键词
Breast cancer; ultrasound; prediction model; least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO); malignant probability; NOMOGRAM; UTILITY; LESIONS;
D O I
10.21037/gs-22-663
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The aim of this study was to develop a simple and effective prediction model for calculating the probability of breast cancer by selecting clinical and sonographic features associated with breast cancer. Methods: A total of 402 lesions from 304 adult females from the ultrasound department of of PLA General Hospital from March 1st, 2020 to April 1st, 2021, were prospectively collected as the development group. The validation group included 121 lesions from 98 patients in our physical examination center from April 1st, 2021 to March 1st, 2022. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) was applied to select clinical and ultrasonic variables, and R language was applied to build a web version of the interactive dynamic column line graph. The prediction model was validated by the validation group and the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) categories. Calibration, differentiation and effectiveness were evaluated by R2, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and decision curve analysis (DCA), respectively. Results: One hundred and seventy-nine malignant lesions and 223 benign lesions were included in the development group after exclusion and follow-up, whereas 62 malignant lesions and 59 benign lesions were enrolled in the validation group. Age, bloody nipple discharge, irregular shape, irregular border, heterogeneous echo, microcalcification, attenuation effects, decreased echo in surrounding tissues, lesions in ducts, abnormal lymph node morphology, nourishing vessel and nourishing vessel's resistance index (RI) greater than 0.70 were selected as independent risk factors. There was no significant difference in the area under the curve (AUC) of the development group between the prediction model and the BI-RADS category (0.959 vs. 0.953, P>0.05), and so as the validation group (0.952 vs. 0.932, P>0.05). For the prediction model, R2 of the development and validation group was 0.78 and 0.72. The DCA showed that the net benefits (NB) of the development group were higher than that of the validation group (0-100% vs. 0-90%). Conclusions: A prediction model was developed with the clinical and ultrasonic features for the precise and intuitive probability of breast cancer. This could provide a reliable reference for further examination.
引用
收藏
页码:736 / +
页数:14
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]   Risk prediction models of breast cancer: a systematic review of model performances [J].
Anothaisintawee, Thunyarat ;
Teerawattananon, Yot ;
Wiratkapun, Chollathip ;
Kasamesup, Vijj ;
Thakkinstian, Ammarin .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2012, 133 (01) :1-10
[2]   Integrating ensemble systems biology feature selection and bimodal deep neural network for breast cancer prognosis prediction [J].
Cheng, Li-Hsin ;
Hsu, Te-Cheng ;
Lin, Che .
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2021, 11 (01)
[3]   Comparison of synthetic and digital mammography with digital breast tomosynthesis or alone for the detection and classification of microcalcifications [J].
Choi, Ji Soo ;
Han, Boo-Kyung ;
Ko, Eun Young ;
Kim, Ga Ram ;
Ko, Eun Sook ;
Park, Ko Woon .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2019, 29 (01) :319-329
[4]   Breast cancer risk models: a comprehensive overview of existing models, validation, and clinical applications [J].
Cintolo-Gonzalez, Jessica A. ;
Braun, Danielle ;
Blackford, Amanda L. ;
Mazzola, Emanuele ;
Acar, Ahmet ;
Plichta, Jennifer K. ;
Griffin, Molly ;
Hughes, Kevin S. .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2017, 164 (02) :263-284
[5]  
DOrsi CJ, 2013, ACR BI-RADS atlas, breast imaging reporting and data system
[6]  
Euhus David M, 2002, Breast J, V8, P23, DOI 10.1046/j.1524-4741.2002.08005.x
[7]   Breast cancer risk-assessment models [J].
Evans, D. Gareth R. ;
Howell, Anthony .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH, 2007, 9 (05)
[8]   Breast cancer in China [J].
Fan, Lei ;
Strasser-Weippl, Kathrin ;
Li, Jun-Jie ;
St Louis, Jessica ;
Finkelstein, Dianne M. ;
Yu, Ke-Da ;
Chen, Wan-Qing ;
Shao, Zhi-Ming ;
Goss, Paul E. .
LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2014, 15 (07) :E279-E289
[9]   Breast Cancer Statistics, 2022 [J].
Giaquinto, Angela N. ;
Sung, Hyuna ;
Miller, Kimberly D. ;
Kramer, Joan L. ;
Newman, Lisa A. ;
Minihan, Adair ;
Jemal, Ahmedin ;
Siegel, Rebecca L. .
CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS, 2022, 72 (06) :524-541
[10]   Survival Prediction and Feature Selection in Patients with Breast Cancer Using Support Vector Regression [J].
Goli, Shahrbanoo ;
Mahjub, Hossein ;
Faradmal, Javad ;
Mashayekhi, Hoda ;
Soltanian, Ali-Reza .
COMPUTATIONAL AND MATHEMATICAL METHODS IN MEDICINE, 2016, 2016