Why Can the Flipped Classroom Frustrate Students? Experiences from an Engineering Mathematics Course

被引:8
作者
Nielsen, Kjetil Liestol [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ South Eastern Norway, Fac Humanities Sports & Educ Sci, Laererskoleveien 40, N-3679 Notodden, Norway
关键词
flipped classroom; student experiences; negative experiences; engineering education; mathematics education; INSTRUCTION; STRATEGIES; MOTIVATION;
D O I
10.3390/educsci13040396
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This paper explores students' experiences with a flipped classroom in a first-year engineering mathematics course with 118 students. While most students were satisfied with the flipped classroom and expressed appreciation for the flexibility, freedom and independence induced by the teaching method, other students expressed frustrations. Based on two surveys with both open-ended and closed-ended questions, this paper explores possible reasons why a flipped classroom can be a source of frustration. Some students expressed having difficulty adjusting their study habits to the flipped classroom approach as well as having difficulty finding the motivation to watch the required learning videos before in-class activities. While some students experienced the group work associated with the flipped classroom format as a positive aspect of their learning, other students expressed irritation because of group members not meeting prepared for the group assignments. The expressed experiences are discussed in light of the self-determination theory and the self-regulated learning theory. Weaknesses with how the flipped classroom was implemented are also discussed.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]   Motivation and cognitive load in the flipped classroom: definition, rationale and a call for research [J].
Abeysekera, Lakmal ;
Dawson, Phillip .
HIGHER EDUCATION RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT, 2015, 34 (01) :1-14
[2]  
Ahn B., 2018, ADV ENG EDUC, V6
[3]   From passive to active: The impact of the flipped classroom through social learning platforms on higher education students' creative thinking [J].
Al-Zahrani, Abdulrahman M. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 46 (06) :1133-1148
[4]   Students’ perceptions of the flipped classroom model in an engineering course: a case study [J].
Baytiyeh H. ;
Naja M.K. .
European Journal of Engineering Education, 2017, 42 (06) :1048-1061
[5]  
Bishop JL, 2013, ASEE ANNU CONF EXPO
[6]   Implementing the flipped classroom: an exploration of study behaviour and student performance [J].
Boeve, Anja J. ;
Meijer, Rob R. ;
Bosker, Roel J. ;
Vugteveen, Jorien ;
Hoekstra, Rink ;
Albers, Casper J. .
HIGHER EDUCATION, 2017, 74 (06) :1015-1032
[7]  
Charmaz K., 2001, GROUNDED THEORY, P27
[8]  
Charmaz K., 2010, CONSTRUCTING GROUNDE, DOI [10.7748/nr.13.4.84.s4, DOI 10.7748/NR.13.4.84.S4, 10.5565/rev/papers/v86n0.825]
[9]  
Charmaz K., 2008, HDB EMERGENT METHODS, P155, DOI DOI 10.1080/15332691.2013.779094
[10]   The pursuit of quality in grounded theory [J].
Charmaz, Kathy ;
Thornberg, Robert .
QUALITATIVE RESEARCH IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 18 (03) :305-327