Social egg freezing: Motivations, treatment experiences and the impact of Covid-19-a single-center experience

被引:7
|
作者
Murugesu, Sughashini [1 ,5 ]
Charalambides, Mikaela Maria [2 ]
Jones, Benjamin P. [3 ]
Saso, Srdjan [1 ]
Faris, Raef [4 ]
Parikh, Jaya [4 ]
Nicopoullos, James [4 ]
Thum, Meen-Yau [4 ]
Bracewell-Milnes, Timothy [4 ]
机构
[1] Imperial Coll London, Hammersmith Hosp Campus, Inst Reprod & Dev Biol, Dept Metab, London, England
[2] Imperial Coll London, Imperial Coll Sch Med, Dept Metab, Sect Invest Med, London, England
[3] Queen Charlottes Matern Hosp, Hammersmith Hosp Campus, London, England
[4] Lister Fertil Clin, Gynaecol & Reprod Med, London, England
[5] Imperial Coll Healthcare NHS Trust, North West London, Du Cane Rd, London W12 0HS, England
关键词
COVID-19; experience; knowledge; motivations; regret; social egg freezing; OOCYTE CRYOPRESERVATION; FERTILITY ASSESSMENT; OVARIAN STIMULATION; LIVE BIRTH; AGE; KNOWLEDGE; WOMEN; ATTITUDES; PERCEPTIONS; VITRIFICATION;
D O I
10.1111/aogs.14565
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
IntroductionThis study aims to assess the motivations and treatment experiences of women undergoing social egg freezing and to understand the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic. Material and methodsBetween January 2011 to December 2021, 191 social egg freezing patients were recruited from the Lister Fertility Clinic, London UK. Participants completed a validated questionnaire investigating patients' perspectives of social egg freezing. A response rate of 46.6% was achieved. ResultsIn all, 93.9% of women expressed concern regarding age-related fertility decline which influenced their decision to undergo social egg freezing. The majority (89.5%) of women were not in a relationship at the time of social egg freezing and considered this a motivating factor. Also, 39.0% of participants had side effects related to treatment which affected work and social life. Participants were significantly more likely to experience side effects if they underwent multiple egg freezing cycles (chi(2), p < 0.01) or if they cryopreserved oocytes during the COVID-19 pandemic (chi(2), p < 0.05). Of the women, 64.0% wished to have cryopreserved oocytes at a younger age, a view significantly more likely if older than 37 years at first social egg freezing cycle (chi(2), p < 0.001). Also, 82.3% of women reported their decision to undergo social egg freezing was not delayed due to concerns regarding COVID-19 exposure during treatment; 44.1% considered the pandemic made them more willing to undergo social egg freezing. ConclusionsMost participants did not regret their decision to undergo social egg freezing but the majority wished they had cryopreserved oocytes at a younger age. This highlights the importance of early education to optimize outcomes and patient choice. The egg freezing process can be stressful, women may have concerns around social egg freezing and unprecedented situations such as the COVID-19 pandemic may alter treatment experience.
引用
收藏
页码:760 / 773
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Pediatric Patients with COVID-19: A Retrospective Single-Center Experience
    Sahin, Ayse
    Dalgic, Nazan
    Sancar, Mesut
    Congur, Emel Celebi
    Kanik, Mehmet Kemal
    Ilgar, Sibel Degim
    Bayraktar, Banu
    Ozdemir, Haci Mustafa
    MEDICAL BULLETIN OF SISLI ETFAL HOSPITAL, 2022, 56 (01): : 62 - 69
  • [22] Single-center haemodialysis experience in India during COVID-19
    Mahapatra, Himansu Sekhar
    Balakrishnan, Muthukumar
    Purusunani, Lalit
    Kumar, Adarsh
    Binoy, Renju
    Singh, Mansi
    Gautam, Abhisek
    Inamdar, Neeraj
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF NEPHROLOGY, 2022, 32 (02) : 110 - 115
  • [23] Coagulopathy in hospitalized COVID-19 patients: A single-center experience
    Ahmed, Marwa Kasim
    Almothaffar, Ali Muhammed Jawad
    IRAQI JOURNAL OF HEMATOLOGY, 2022, 11 (02) : 139 - 144
  • [24] Neuroimaging Spectrum in COVID-19 Infection: A Single-Center Experience
    Tiwari, Sarbesh
    Garg, Pawan Kumar
    Panda, Samhita
    Gupta, Aanchal
    Hegde, Adarsh
    Kumar, Deepak
    Khera, Daisy
    Bhatia, Pradeep Kumar
    Garg, Mayank
    Yadav, Taruna
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY AND IMAGING, 2023, 33 (03) : 351 - 360
  • [25] COVID-19 in lung transplant recipients: A single-center experience
    Turkkan, Sinan
    Beyoglu, Muhammet Ali
    Sahin, Mehmet Furkan
    Yazicioglu, Alkin
    Tezer Tekce, Yasemin
    Yekeler, Erdal
    TRANSPLANT INFECTIOUS DISEASE, 2021, 23 (05)
  • [26] Effects of COVID-19 on STEMI patients: Single-center experience
    Abuzeyad, Feras H.
    Chomayil, Yasser
    Amin, Mohammad Ibrahim
    Farooq, Moonis
    Alshaban, Mahmood
    Kamkoun, Wael
    Nair, Sujith
    Alqasem, Leena
    Makwana, Daya Ram
    Das, Priya
    HEART VIEWS, 2022, 23 (03): : 138 - 143
  • [27] COVID-19 in Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Single-Center Experience
    Mert, Mehmet
    Kutluay, Ahmet
    Dursun, Belda
    Ozban, Murat
    Senol, Hande
    Ceri, Mevlut
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF NEPHROLOGY, 2023, 32 (01): : 55 - 62
  • [28] Evaluation of Newborns Diagnosed with COVID-19: A Single-Center Experience
    Aydogan, Seda
    Zenciroglu, Aysegul
    Citli, Rumeysa
    Dilli, Dilek
    Ozdem, Suna
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2023, 40 (05) : 567 - 574
  • [29] COVID-19 in hemodialysis patients: a single-center experience in Istanbul
    Kocak, Sibel Yucel
    Kayalar, Arzu Ozdemir
    Karaosmanoglu, Hayat Kumbasar
    Yilmaz, Murvet
    INTERNATIONAL UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, 2021, 53 (11) : 2385 - 2397
  • [30] COVID-19 in hemodialysis patients: a single-center experience in Istanbul
    Sibel Yucel Kocak
    Arzu Ozdemir Kayalar
    Hayat Kumbasar Karaosmanoglu
    Murvet Yilmaz
    International Urology and Nephrology, 2021, 53 : 2385 - 2397