Social egg freezing: Motivations, treatment experiences and the impact of Covid-19-a single-center experience

被引:7
|
作者
Murugesu, Sughashini [1 ,5 ]
Charalambides, Mikaela Maria [2 ]
Jones, Benjamin P. [3 ]
Saso, Srdjan [1 ]
Faris, Raef [4 ]
Parikh, Jaya [4 ]
Nicopoullos, James [4 ]
Thum, Meen-Yau [4 ]
Bracewell-Milnes, Timothy [4 ]
机构
[1] Imperial Coll London, Hammersmith Hosp Campus, Inst Reprod & Dev Biol, Dept Metab, London, England
[2] Imperial Coll London, Imperial Coll Sch Med, Dept Metab, Sect Invest Med, London, England
[3] Queen Charlottes Matern Hosp, Hammersmith Hosp Campus, London, England
[4] Lister Fertil Clin, Gynaecol & Reprod Med, London, England
[5] Imperial Coll Healthcare NHS Trust, North West London, Du Cane Rd, London W12 0HS, England
关键词
COVID-19; experience; knowledge; motivations; regret; social egg freezing; OOCYTE CRYOPRESERVATION; FERTILITY ASSESSMENT; OVARIAN STIMULATION; LIVE BIRTH; AGE; KNOWLEDGE; WOMEN; ATTITUDES; PERCEPTIONS; VITRIFICATION;
D O I
10.1111/aogs.14565
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
IntroductionThis study aims to assess the motivations and treatment experiences of women undergoing social egg freezing and to understand the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic. Material and methodsBetween January 2011 to December 2021, 191 social egg freezing patients were recruited from the Lister Fertility Clinic, London UK. Participants completed a validated questionnaire investigating patients' perspectives of social egg freezing. A response rate of 46.6% was achieved. ResultsIn all, 93.9% of women expressed concern regarding age-related fertility decline which influenced their decision to undergo social egg freezing. The majority (89.5%) of women were not in a relationship at the time of social egg freezing and considered this a motivating factor. Also, 39.0% of participants had side effects related to treatment which affected work and social life. Participants were significantly more likely to experience side effects if they underwent multiple egg freezing cycles (chi(2), p < 0.01) or if they cryopreserved oocytes during the COVID-19 pandemic (chi(2), p < 0.05). Of the women, 64.0% wished to have cryopreserved oocytes at a younger age, a view significantly more likely if older than 37 years at first social egg freezing cycle (chi(2), p < 0.001). Also, 82.3% of women reported their decision to undergo social egg freezing was not delayed due to concerns regarding COVID-19 exposure during treatment; 44.1% considered the pandemic made them more willing to undergo social egg freezing. ConclusionsMost participants did not regret their decision to undergo social egg freezing but the majority wished they had cryopreserved oocytes at a younger age. This highlights the importance of early education to optimize outcomes and patient choice. The egg freezing process can be stressful, women may have concerns around social egg freezing and unprecedented situations such as the COVID-19 pandemic may alter treatment experience.
引用
收藏
页码:760 / 773
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] COVID-19 in Pregnancy: A Single-center Experience in Kazakhstan
    Maukayeva, Saule
    Shabdarbayeva, Dariya
    Karimova, Saya
    ERCIYES MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2022, 44 (01) : 98 - 101
  • [2] Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and the restrictions on pediatric appendicitis in Turkey: A single-center experience
    Okur, Dicle Sener
    Memetoglu, Mehmet Erdal
    Edirne, Yesim
    PEDIATRICS INTERNATIONAL, 2022, 64 (01)
  • [3] The impact of COVID-19 pandemic on urological emergencies: a single-center experience
    Giovanni Motterle
    Alessandro Morlacco
    Massimo Iafrate
    Marta Bianco
    Giuliano Federa
    Orest Xhafka
    Filiberto Zattoni
    Tommaso Prayer-Galetti
    World Journal of Urology, 2021, 39 : 1985 - 1989
  • [4] The impact of COVID-19 pandemic on urological emergencies: a single-center experience
    Motterle, Giovanni
    Morlacco, Alessandro
    Lafrate, Massimo
    Bianco, Marta
    Federa, Giuliano
    Xhafka, Orest
    Zattoni, Filiberto
    Prayer-Galetti, Tommaso
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2021, 39 (06) : 1985 - 1989
  • [5] Impact of COVID-19 on inpatient clinical emergencies: A single-center experience
    Mitchell, Oscar J. L.
    Neefe, Stacie
    Ginestra, Jennifer C.
    Baston, Cameron M.
    Frazer, Michael J.
    Gudowski, Steven
    Min, Jeff
    Ahmed, Nahreen H.
    Pascual, Jose L.
    Schweickert, William D.
    Anderson, Brian J.
    Anesi, George L.
    Falk, Scott A.
    Shashaty, Michael G. S.
    RESUSCITATION PLUS, 2021, 6
  • [6] Comparison of Tocilizumab and Anakinra in the Treatment of COVID-19: A Single-Center Experience
    Acat, Murat
    Cavdar, Ozben
    Tezce, Ahmet
    Acat, Bengisu Pinar
    DUZCE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2022, 24 (02) : 116 - 120
  • [7] Impact of COVID-19 on the care of acute appendicitis: a single-center experience in Korea
    Kim, Chang Woo
    Lee, Suk-Hwan
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL TREATMENT AND RESEARCH, 2021, 101 (04) : 240 - 246
  • [8] Evolving Impact of COVID-19 on Intestinal Transplant Recipients: A Single-Center Experience
    Powers, Colin
    Corrente, Brielle
    Joyce, Jennifer
    Stein, William
    Polydor, Shelly
    Gunabushanam, Vikraman
    Khanna, Ajai
    Silveira, Fernanda P.
    Cruz Jr, Ruy J.
    CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, 2025, 39 (01)
  • [9] The Impact of COVID-19 Outbreak on Electrophysiological Procedures: A Single-Center Tertiary Experience
    Sezenoz, Burak
    Ates, Ahmet Hakan
    Yorgun, Hikmet
    Aytemir, Kudret
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF THERAPEUTICS, 2022, 28 (01): : 52 - 56
  • [10] The Impact of COVID-19 on Elective Cardiovascular Procedures in Taiwan - A Single-Center Experience
    Liao, Chia-Te
    Chen, Zhih-Cherng
    Chang, Wei-Ting
    ACTA CARDIOLOGICA SINICA, 2021, 37 (01) : 97 - 99