Perceived interest in learning sustainability competencies among higher education students

被引:7
作者
Hyytinen, Heidi [1 ]
Laakso, Senja [2 ,3 ]
Pietikainen, Janna [4 ,5 ]
Ratvio, Rami [1 ]
Ruippo, Lotta [6 ]
Tuononen, Tarja [1 ]
Vainio, Annukka [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Helsinki, Ctr Univ Teaching & Learning, Fac Educ Sci, Helsinki, Finland
[2] Tampere Univ, Dept Management & Business, Adm Studies, Tampere, Finland
[3] Univ Helsinki, Ctr Consumer Soc Res, Helsinki, Finland
[4] Univ Helsinki, Fac Agr & Forestry, Dept Forest Sci, Helsinki, Finland
[5] Univ Helsinki, Helsinki Inst Sustainabil Sci, Helsinki, Finland
[6] Univ Helsinki, Fac Educ Sci, Dept Educ, Helsinki, Finland
关键词
Sustainability competencies; Pro-ecological worldview; New ecological paradigm; Student perspectives; Sustainability education; Higher education; KEY COMPETENCES; ECOLOGICAL PARADIGM; KNOWLEDGE; FRAMEWORK; ATTITUDES; SCALE; GOALS; NEP;
D O I
10.1108/IJSHE-06-2022-0198
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
PurposeThis study aims to assess higher education students' interest in learning sustainability competencies and their pro-ecological worldviews at a large research-intensive university in Finland to provide a background information for developing a sustainability science course. Design/methodology/approachIn total, 797 students participated in the study. The data were collected through an online survey that measured students' interest in learning sustainability competencies and their pro-ecological worldviews. Participants were classified into five categories based on field of study. The data were analysed by using Pearson's correlation, independent samples t-tests, and analysis of variance. FindingsThe participating students perceived learning of critical thinking and values thinking most interesting. Interest in learning sustainability competencies and pro-ecological worldview appeared to differ across fields of study. Participants studying humanities expressed lower interest in collaborative use of digital technology compared to the participating students in science and agriculture. Participating students in health and welfare scored lower on interest in learning values thinking than students in other study fields. Research limitations/implicationsThe response rate was low. It is likely that the participants felt strongly about sustainability challenges, therefore making them more interested in sustainability competencies. The limited number of sustainability competencies studied does not allow generalisation to all sustainability competencies. Practical implicationsThe differences in interest in learning sustainability competencies and pro-ecological worldview should be understood and considered when planning sustainability education. Originality/valueThese results provide new insights into the interlinkage of students' interest in learning sustainability competencies, their pro-ecological worldviews and their field of study.
引用
收藏
页码:118 / 137
页数:20
相关论文
共 60 条
  • [1] Developing a university-wide course on sustainability: a critical evaluation of planning and implementation
    Aktas, Can B.
    Whelan, Rosemary
    Stoffer, Howard
    Todd, Edmund
    Kern, Cindy L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2015, 106 : 216 - 221
  • [2] Comparing students' perceived and actual competence in higher vocational education
    Baartman, Liesbeth
    Ruijs, Lotte
    [J]. ASSESSMENT & EVALUATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2011, 36 (04) : 385 - 398
  • [3] Bianchi G., 2022, GreenComp - The European sustainability competence framework, DOI DOI 10.2760/13286
  • [4] Biggs J, 2011, Teaching for Quality Learning at University, V4th
  • [5] Biggs J. B., 2003, Teaching for Quality Learning at University. Does. Higher Education. What the Student
  • [6] Key competencies in sustainability in higher education-toward an agreed-upon reference framework
    Brundiers, Katja
    Barth, Matthias
    Cebrian, Gisela
    Cohen, Matthew
    Diaz, Liliana
    Doucette-Remington, Sonya
    Dripps, Weston
    Habron, Geoffrey
    Harre, Niki
    Jarchow, Meghann
    Losch, Kealalokahi
    Michel, Jessica
    Mochizuki, Yoko
    Rieckmann, Marco
    Parnell, Roderic
    Walker, Peter
    Zint, Michaela
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY SCIENCE, 2021, 16 (01) : 13 - 29
  • [7] Costello A. B., 2005, Practical Assessment, Research Evaluation, V10, P7, DOI [10.7275/JYJ1-4868, 10.7275/jyj1-4868, DOI 10.7275/JYJ1-4868]
  • [8] Universities' Reporting on SDGs: Using THE Impact Rankings to Model and Measure Their Contribution to Sustainability
    De la Poza, Elena
    Merello, Paloma
    Barbera, Antonio
    Celani, Alberto
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (04) : 1 - 30
  • [9] Dunlap R.E., 1978, J ENVIRON EDUC, V9, P10, DOI [10.1080/00958964.1978.10801875, DOI 10.1080/00958964.1978.10801875]
  • [10] Measuring endorsement of the new ecological paradigm: A revised NEP scale
    Dunlap, RE
    Van Liere, KD
    Mertig, AG
    Jones, RE
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SOCIAL ISSUES, 2000, 56 (03) : 425 - 442