Deal-making, diplomacy and transactional forced migration

被引:17
作者
Adamson, Fiona B. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Greenhill, Kelly M. [4 ,5 ,6 ,7 ,8 ,9 ,10 ,11 ,12 ]
机构
[1] Univ London, SOAS, Dept Polit & Int Studies, London, England
[2] Chatham House, Queen Elizabeth II Acad, London, England
[3] London Migrat Res Grp, London, England
[4] Tufts Univ, Medford, MA USA
[5] MIT, Cambridge, MA USA
[6] MIT, Seminar Program 21, Cambridge, MA USA
[7] NATO, Washington, DC USA
[8] UN, New York, NY USA
[9] UN High Commissioner Refugees, Geneva, Switzerland
[10] World Bank, Washington, DC USA
[11] Ford Fdn, New York, NY USA
[12] US Dept Def, Arlington Cty, VA USA
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
diplomacy; history and International Relations; international migration; forced migration; international security; foreign policy; human rights; SOVIET CITIZENS; POLICY; REPATRIATION; CRISIS; HYPOCRISY; EUROPE; WORLD;
D O I
10.1093/ia/iiad017
中图分类号
D81 [国际关系];
学科分类号
030207 ;
摘要
Former US President Donald J. Trump was infamous for his nakedly transactional approach to politics. However, as we demonstrate in this article through the lens of migration politics, this kind of unabashedly transactional approach is less an outlier than a common feature of contemporary international politics. Drawing in part upon initial findings from our ongoing Diplomacy of Forced Migration Dataset Project, we explore historical and contemporary cases to illustrate how transactional migration management 'deals' such as the 2022 UK-Rwanda Migration and Economic Development Partnership are not particularly new, unusual, or revolutionary. In this exploration of the long history of deal-making in the realm of forced migration management, we first define the phenomenon-which we term transactional forced migration (TFM)-and situate it within the growing literature on migration diplomacy, externalization and what is known as the instrumentalization and/or weaponization of migration. We then highlight illustrative historical precedents that presage what we are witnessing today. We additionally identify and unpack several of the under-appreciated connections between TFM schemes and other dimensions of diplomacy and international politics. We conclude with a summary of our argument, its implications for contemporary policy and a few thoughts about what current trends suggest the future is likely to hold.
引用
收藏
页码:707 / 725
页数:19
相关论文
共 104 条
[1]   Globality and Entangled Security: Rethinking the Post-1945 Order [J].
Adamson, Fiona B. ;
Greenhill, Kelly M. .
NEW GLOBAL STUDIES, 2021, 15 (2-3) :165-180
[2]   The Migration State in the Global South: Nationalizing, Developmental, and Neoliberal Models of Migration Management [J].
Adamson, Fiona B. ;
Tsourapas, Gerasimos .
INTERNATIONAL MIGRATION REVIEW, 2020, 54 (03) :853-882
[3]   Migration Diplomacy in World Politics [J].
Adamson, Fiona B. ;
Tsourapas, Gerasimos .
INTERNATIONAL STUDIES PERSPECTIVES, 2019, 20 (02) :113-128
[4]  
Adar Sinem., 2020, SWP Comment
[5]  
African Union, 2021, PRESS STAT DENM AL A
[6]   Transnational Histories of Penal Transportation: Punishment, Labour and Governance in the British Imperial World, 1788-1939 [J].
Anderson, Clare .
AUSTRALIAN HISTORICAL STUDIES, 2016, 47 (03) :381-397
[7]  
Andersson Ruben., 2014, Illegality, Inc: Clandestine Migration and the Business of Bordering Europe"
[8]  
[Anonymous], 1944, B INT NEWS, V21, P579
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2021, JOINT DECL MIGR EUR
[10]  
[Anonymous], DW