Countries' vulnerability to food supply disruptions caused by the Russia-Ukraine war from a trade dependency perspective

被引:12
作者
Zhang, Zhengyang [1 ,5 ]
Abdullah, Meshal J. [2 ]
Xu, Guochang [3 ,4 ]
Matsubae, Kazuyo [1 ,5 ]
Zeng, Xianlai [3 ]
机构
[1] Tohoku Univ, Grad Sch Environm Studies, Sendai 9800872, Japan
[2] Kuwait Environm Publ Author, Kuwait 12066, Kuwait
[3] Tsinghua Univ, Sch Environm, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
[4] Natl Inst Environm Studies, Mat Cycles Div, Onogawa 16-2, Tsukuba 3058506, Japan
[5] Res Inst Humanity & Nat, Kyoto 6038047, Japan
基金
日本科学技术振兴机构;
关键词
SECURITY; POPULATION;
D O I
10.1038/s41598-023-43883-4
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Disruptions of key food and fertilizer exports from Russia and Ukraine have exposed many countries to challenges accessing some commodities since these countries' war began. We evaluated the short-term, external, and direct impacts of disruptions of six food commodities and three types of fertilizer supplies from Russia and Ukraine on food access for all trading partners of the two countries by applying a set of trade and socioeconomic indicators. We found that the external food supplies of 279 countries and territories were affected to varying degrees; 24 countries-especially Georgia, Armenia, Kazakhstan, Azerbaijan, and Mongolia-are extremely vulnerable because they depend almost entirely on a variety of food imports from Russia and Ukraine. Access to fertilizers was affected in 136 countries and territories, particularly Estonia (potassic fertilizer), Mongolia (nitrogenous fertilizers), Kazakhstan (mixed fertilizers), and Brazil, the United States, China, and India (all types of fertilizers). An integrated assessment of countries' import types, purchasing power parity per capita, and populations indicated that the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Ethiopia, Egypt, and Pakistan are most vulnerable to such supply disruptions. Development of research into diversification and decentralization strategies for food access is needed to guide stable food supply policies.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 67 条
[1]   The Russia-Ukraine war: Implications for global and regional food security and potential policy responses [J].
Abay, Kibrom A. ;
Breisinger, Clemens ;
Glauber, Joseph ;
Kurdi, Sikandra ;
Laborde, David ;
Siddig, Khalid .
GLOBAL FOOD SECURITY-AGRICULTURE POLICY ECONOMICS AND ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 36
[2]   Caught off guard and beaten: The Ukraine war and food security in the Middle East [J].
Al-Saidi, Mohammad .
FRONTIERS IN NUTRITION, 2023, 10
[3]   High energy and fertilizer prices are more damaging than food export curtailment from Ukraine and Russia for food prices, health and the environment [J].
Alexander, Peter ;
Arneth, Almut ;
Henry, Roslyn ;
Maire, Juliette ;
Rabin, Sam ;
Rounsevell, Mark D. A. .
NATURE FOOD, 2023, 4 (01) :84-95
[4]   Food security in the United Arab Emirates: External cereal supply risks [J].
Ali, Beshir M. ;
Manikas, Ioannis ;
Sundarakani, Balan .
COGENT ECONOMICS & FINANCE, 2022, 10 (01)
[5]   POPULATION-SIZE AND DEMAND [J].
ANDERSON, H .
SOUTHERN ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 1961, 28 (02) :182-186
[6]   A MULTI-REGION INPUT-OUTPUT TABLE BASED ON THE GLOBAL TRADE ANALYSIS PROJECT DATABASE (GTAP-MRIO) [J].
Andrew, Robbie M. ;
Peters, Glen P. .
ECONOMIC SYSTEMS RESEARCH, 2013, 25 (01) :99-121
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2022, NATURE, V604, P217, DOI 10.1038/d41586-022-00994-8
[8]   The Ukraine war and rising commodity prices: Implications for developing countries [J].
Arndt, Channing ;
Diao, Xinshen ;
Dorosh, Paul ;
Pauw, Karl ;
Thurlow, James .
GLOBAL FOOD SECURITY-AGRICULTURE POLICY ECONOMICS AND ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 36
[9]  
Athas I., CNN
[10]   Implications of the Russia-Ukraine war for global food security [J].
Behnassi, Mohamed ;
El Haiba, Mahjoub .
NATURE HUMAN BEHAVIOUR, 2022, 6 (06) :754-755