Forecasting flexibility of charging of electric vehicles: Tree and cluster-based methods

被引:24
作者
Genov, Evgenii [1 ]
De Cauwer, Cedric
Van Kriekinge, Gilles
Coosemans, Thierr y
Messagie, Maarten
机构
[1] Vrije Univ Brussel VUB, MOBI Res Ctr, EVERGi Res Grp, Pleinlaan 2, B-1020 Brussels, Belgium
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
Flexibility; Forecasting; GMM; LGBM; User engagement; Smart charging; Regulation market; Grid congest i o n;
D O I
10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.121969
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Scheduling electric vehicle charging sessions allow s to aggregate flexibility in order to minimize ener g y costs and reduce congestion in the electricity grid. Existing research shows that user input for ener g y and parking duration does not serve as a reliable prediction. The study presents an evaluation of the forecast error and computational performance of the different models. Two main methods are investigated: tree-based (gradient boosted trees LightGBM) and cluster-based (Gaussian mixture model). We also present a novel dynamic cluster-based method, the Similar Sessions method, which employs the similarity between charging sessions based on numerical variables. The results highlight the importance of selecting the forecast model influenced by the availability of training data. The effect of user registration on the accuracy of the forecast is investigated. The tests are run using ACN-Data dataset of Electric Vehicle charging sessions in California, United States. While underperforming on a sma l l dataset with a short look-back period, tree-based methods show superiorit y while the charging data are accumulating. The Similar Sessions method show s superior accuracy under various data availability conditions. The proposed method requires no prior training, but has slower computational performance in deployment.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   Optuna: A Next-generation Hyperparameter Optimization Framework [J].
Akiba, Takuya ;
Sano, Shotaro ;
Yanase, Toshihiko ;
Ohta, Takeru ;
Koyama, Masanori .
KDD'19: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 25TH ACM SIGKDD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCCE ON KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY AND DATA MINING, 2019, :2623-2631
[2]   ARIMA-based decoupled time series forecasting of electric vehicle charging demand for stochastic power system operation [J].
Amini, M. Hadi ;
Kargarian, Amin ;
Karabasoglu, Orkun .
ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEMS RESEARCH, 2016, 140 :378-390
[3]   Kaggle forecasting competitions: An overlooked learning opportunity [J].
Bojer, Casper Solheim ;
Meldgaard, Jens Peder .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FORECASTING, 2021, 37 (02) :587-603
[4]   Electric Vehicles Plug-In Duration Forecasting Using Machine Learning for Battery Optimization [J].
Chen, Yukai ;
Alamin, Khaled Sidahmed Sidahmed ;
Jahier Pagliari, Daniele ;
Vinco, Sara ;
Macii, Enrico ;
Poncino, Massimo .
ENERGIES, 2020, 13 (16)
[5]  
Develder C, 2016, INT CONF SMART GRID
[6]  
Evgenii Genov, 2017, Forecasting flexibility of charging of electric vehicles: tree and cluster-based methods
[7]   Improving Smart Charging Prioritization by Predicting Electric Vehicle Departure Time [J].
Frendo, Oliver ;
Gaertner, Nadine ;
Stuckenschmidt, Heiner .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS, 2021, 22 (10) :6646-6653
[8]   Modeling and Forecasting Electric Vehicle Consumption Profiles [J].
Gerossier, Alexis ;
Girard, Robin ;
Kariniotakis, George .
ENERGIES, 2019, 12 (07)
[9]   Clustered multi-node learning of electric vehicle charging flexibility [J].
Gilanifar, Mostafa ;
Parvania, Masood .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2021, 282
[10]   Probabilistic forecasts of time and energy flexibility in battery electric vehicle charging [J].
Huber, Julian ;
Dann, David ;
Weinhardt, Christof .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2020, 262