Differences in configural processing for human versus android dynamic facial expressions

被引：1

作者：

Diel, Alexander ^{[1
,2
]}

Sato, Wataru ^{[1
]}

Hsu, Chun-Ting ^{[1
]}

Minato, Takashi ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] RIKEN Informat R&D & Strategy Headquarters, Guardian Robot Project, Kyoto, Japan

[2] Cardiff Univ, Sch Psychol, Cardiff, Wales

来源：

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS | 2023年 / 13卷 / 01期

关键词：

FACE; INVERSION; RECOGNITION; FEATURES; MODEL;

D O I：

10.1038/s41598-023-44140-4

中图分类号：

O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];

学科分类号：

07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;

摘要：

Humanlike androids can function as social agents in social situations and in experimental research. While some androids can imitate facial emotion expressions, it is unclear whether their expressions tap the same processing mechanisms utilized in human expression processing, for example configural processing. In this study, the effects of global inversion and asynchrony between facial features as configuration manipulations were compared in android and human dynamic emotion expressions. Seventy-five participants rated (1) angry and happy emotion recognition and (2) arousal and valence ratings of upright or inverted, synchronous or asynchronous, android or human agent dynamic emotion expressions. Asynchrony in dynamic expressions significantly decreased all ratings (except valence in angry expressions) in all human expressions, but did not affect android expressions. Inversion did not affect any measures regardless of agent type. These results suggest that dynamic facial expressions are processed in a synchrony-based configural manner for humans, but not for androids.

引用

页数：8

共 33 条

[1]

Adams A., 2011, Affect. Comput. Intell. Interact, DOI [10.1007/978-3-642-24571-8_19, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-24571-8_19]

[2] Deciphering the enigmatic face - The importance of facial dynamics in interpreting subtle facial expressions [J].

Ambadar, Z ;

Schooler, JW ;

Cohn, JF .

PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2005, 16 (05) :403-410

[3]

[Anonymous], 1978, FACIAL ACTION CODING

[4]

Baltrusaitis T., 13 IEEE INT C AUT FA, P59

[5] Recognising subtle emotional expressions: The role of facial movements [J].

Bould, Emma ;

Morris, Neil ;

Wink, Brian .

COGNITION & EMOTION, 2008, 22 (08) :1569-1587

[6] Detection of emotional faces: Salient physical features guide effective visual search [J].

Calvo, Manuel G. ;

Nummenmaa, Lauri .

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 2008, 137 (03) :471-494

[7] How Well Do Computer-Generated Faces Tap Face Expertise? [J].

Crookes, Kate ;

Ewing, Louise ;

Gildenhuys, Ju-dith ;

Kloth, Nadine ;

Hayward, William G. ;

Oxner, Matt ;

Pond, Stephen ;

Rhodes, Gillian .

PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (11)

[8] General and specific responsiveness of the amygdala during explicit emotion recognition in females and males [J].

Derntl, Birgit ;

Habel, Ute ;

Windischberger, Christian ;

Robinson, Simon ;

Kryspin-Exner, Ilse ;

Gur, Ruben C. ;

Moser, Ewald .

BMC NEUROSCIENCE, 2009, 10

[9] Familiarity, orientation, and realism increase face uncanniness by sensitizing to facial distortions [J].

Diel, Alexander ;

Lewis, Michael .

JOURNAL OF VISION, 2022, 22 (04)

[10] THE INVERTED FACE INVERSION EFFECT IN PROSOPAGNOSIA - EVIDENCE FOR MANDATORY, FACE-SPECIFIC PERCEPTUAL MECHANISMS [J].

FARAH, MJ ;

WILSON, KD ;

DRAIN, HM ;

TANAKA, JR .

VISION RESEARCH, 1995, 35 (14) :2089-2093

← 1 2 3 4 →