Rapid reviews methods series: Guidance on literature search

被引:44
作者
Klerings, Irma [1 ]
Robalino, Shannon [2 ]
Booth, Andrew [3 ]
Escobar-Liquitay, Camila Micaela [4 ]
Sommer, Isolde [1 ]
Gartlehner, Gerald [1 ,5 ]
Devane, Declan [6 ,7 ]
Waffenschmidt, Siw [8 ]
机构
[1] Univ Krems, Danube Univ Krems, Dept Evidence Based Med & Evaluat, Krems, Austria
[2] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Ctr Evidence Based Policy, Portland, OR USA
[3] Univ Sheffield, Sch Hlth & Related Res ScHARR, Sheffield, England
[4] Inst Univ Escuela Med Hosp Italiano Buenos Aires, Associate Cochrane Ctr, Res Dept, Buenos Aires, Argentina
[5] RTI Int, RTI UNC Evidence Based Practice Ctr, Res Triangle Pk, NC USA
[6] Natl Univ Ireland Galway, Sch Nursing & Midwifery, HRB TMRN, Galway, Ireland
[7] Univ Galway, Evidence Synth Ireland & Cochrane Ireland, Galway, Ireland
[8] Inst Qual & Efficiency Healthcare, Informat Management Dept, Cologne, Germany
关键词
Methods; Evidence-Based Practice; Systematic Reviews as Topic; Information Science; STRATEGIES;
D O I
10.1136/bmjebm-2022-112079
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
This paper is part of a series of methodological guidance from the Cochrane Rapid Reviews Methods Group. Rapid reviews (RR) use modified systematic review methods to accelerate the review process while maintaining systematic, transparent and reproducible methods. In this paper, we address considerations for RR searches. We cover the main areas relevant to the search process: preparation and planning, information sources and search methods, search strategy development, quality assurance, reporting, and record management. Two options exist for abbreviating the search process: (1) reducing time spent on conducting searches and (2) reducing the size of the search result. Because screening search results is usually more resource-intensive than conducting the search, we suggest investing time upfront in planning and optimising the search to save time by reducing the literature screening workload. To achieve this goal, RR teams should work with an information specialist. They should select a small number of relevant information sources (eg, databases) and use search methods that are highly likely to identify relevant literature for their topic. Database search strategies should aim to optimise both precision and sensitivity, and quality assurance measures (peer review and validation of search strategies) should be applied to minimise errors.
引用
收藏
页码:412 / 417
页数:6
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]   Searching and synthesising 'grey literature' and 'grey information' in public health: Critical reflections on three case studies [J].
Adams J. ;
Hillier-Brown F.C. ;
Moore H.J. ;
Lake A.A. ;
Araujo-Soares V. ;
White M. ;
Summerbell C. .
Systematic Reviews, 5 (1)
[2]   Combining abbreviated literature searches with single-reviewer screening: three case studies of rapid reviews [J].
Affengruber, Lisa ;
Wagner, Gernot ;
Waffenschmidt, Siw ;
Lhachimi, Stefan K. ;
Nussbaumer-Streit, Barbara ;
Thaler, Kylie ;
Griebler, Ursula ;
Klerings, Irma ;
Gartlehner, Gerald .
SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2020, 9 (01)
[3]  
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 2022, REV DAT REP PLUS SRD
[4]  
[Anonymous], The InterTASC Information Specialists Sub-Group Search Filter Resource
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2022, EndNote
[6]  
Arber M., 2021, SEARCH STRATEGY DEV
[7]   Searching Embase and MEDLINE by using only major descriptors or title and abstract fields: a prospective exploratory study [J].
Bramer, Wichor M. ;
Giustini, Dean ;
Kleijnen, Jos ;
Franco, Oscar H. .
SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2018, 7
[8]   Evaluation of a new method for librarian-mediated literature searches for systematic reviews [J].
Bramer, Wichor M. ;
Rethlefsen, Melissa L. ;
Mast, Frans ;
Kleijnen, Jos .
RESEARCH SYNTHESIS METHODS, 2018, 9 (04) :510-520
[9]   Comparing the coverage, recall, and precision of searches for 120 systematic reviews in Embase, MEDLINE, and Google Scholar: A prospective study [J].
Bramer W.M. ;
Giustini D. ;
Kramer B.M.R. .
Systematic Reviews, 5 (1)
[10]   Improving the precision of search strategies for guideline surveillance [J].
Casey, Monica ;
Raynor, Michael ;
Jacob, Catherine ;
Sharp, Stephen ;
McFarlane, Emma .
RESEARCH SYNTHESIS METHODS, 2020, 11 (06) :903-912