Rapid reviews methods series: Guidance on literature search

被引:35
|
作者
Klerings, Irma [1 ]
Robalino, Shannon [2 ]
Booth, Andrew [3 ]
Escobar-Liquitay, Camila Micaela [4 ]
Sommer, Isolde [1 ]
Gartlehner, Gerald [1 ,5 ]
Devane, Declan [6 ,7 ]
Waffenschmidt, Siw [8 ]
机构
[1] Univ Krems, Danube Univ Krems, Dept Evidence Based Med & Evaluat, Krems, Austria
[2] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Ctr Evidence Based Policy, Portland, OR USA
[3] Univ Sheffield, Sch Hlth & Related Res ScHARR, Sheffield, England
[4] Inst Univ Escuela Med Hosp Italiano Buenos Aires, Associate Cochrane Ctr, Res Dept, Buenos Aires, Argentina
[5] RTI Int, RTI UNC Evidence Based Practice Ctr, Res Triangle Pk, NC USA
[6] Natl Univ Ireland Galway, Sch Nursing & Midwifery, HRB TMRN, Galway, Ireland
[7] Univ Galway, Evidence Synth Ireland & Cochrane Ireland, Galway, Ireland
[8] Inst Qual & Efficiency Healthcare, Informat Management Dept, Cologne, Germany
关键词
Methods; Evidence-Based Practice; Systematic Reviews as Topic; Information Science; STRATEGIES;
D O I
10.1136/bmjebm-2022-112079
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
This paper is part of a series of methodological guidance from the Cochrane Rapid Reviews Methods Group. Rapid reviews (RR) use modified systematic review methods to accelerate the review process while maintaining systematic, transparent and reproducible methods. In this paper, we address considerations for RR searches. We cover the main areas relevant to the search process: preparation and planning, information sources and search methods, search strategy development, quality assurance, reporting, and record management. Two options exist for abbreviating the search process: (1) reducing time spent on conducting searches and (2) reducing the size of the search result. Because screening search results is usually more resource-intensive than conducting the search, we suggest investing time upfront in planning and optimising the search to save time by reducing the literature screening workload. To achieve this goal, RR teams should work with an information specialist. They should select a small number of relevant information sources (eg, databases) and use search methods that are highly likely to identify relevant literature for their topic. Database search strategies should aim to optimise both precision and sensitivity, and quality assurance measures (peer review and validation of search strategies) should be applied to minimise errors.
引用
收藏
页码:412 / 417
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Rapid reviews methods series: guidance on rapid qualitative evidence synthesis
    Booth, Andrew
    Sommer, Isolde
    Noyes, Jane
    Houghton, Catherine
    Campbell, Fiona
    BMJ EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE, 2024, 29 (03) : 194 - 200
  • [2] Rapid reviews methods series: Guidance on assessing the certainty of evidence
    Gartlehner, Gerald
    Nussbaumer-Streit, Barbara
    Devane, Declan
    Kahwati, Leila
    Viswanathan, Meera
    King, Valerie J.
    Qaseem, Amir
    Akl, Elie
    Schuenemann, Holger J.
    Cochrane Rapid Reviews Methods Grp
    BMJ EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE, 2024, 29 (01) : 50 - 54
  • [3] Rapid reviews methods series (paper 7): guidance on rapid scoping, mapping and evidence and gap map ('Big Picture Reviews')
    Campbell, Fiona
    Sutton, Anthea
    Pollock, Danielle
    Garritty, Chantelle
    Tricco, Andrea C.
    Schmidt, Lena
    Khalil, Hanan
    BMJ EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE, 2025,
  • [4] Rapid review method series: interim guidance for the reporting of rapid reviews
    Stevens, Adrienne
    Hersi, Mona
    Garritty, Chantelle
    Hartling, Lisa
    Shea, Beverley J.
    Stewart, Lesley A.
    Welch, Vivian Andrea
    Tricco, Andrea C.
    BMJ EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE, 2024,
  • [5] Rapid reviews methods series: considerations and recommendations for evidence synthesis in rapid reviews
    King, Valerie J.
    Nussbaumer-Streit, Barbara
    Shaw, Elizabeth
    Devane, Declan
    Kahwati, Leila
    Viswanathan, Meera
    Gartlehner, Gerald
    BMJ EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE, 2024,
  • [6] Cochrane Rapid Reviews Methods Group offers evidence-informed guidance to conduct rapid reviews
    Garritty, Chantelle
    Gartlehner, Gerald
    Nussbaumer-Streit, Barbara
    King, Valerie J.
    Hamel, Candyce
    Kamel, Chris
    Affengruber, Lisa
    Stevens, Adrienne
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2021, 130 : 13 - 22
  • [7] Updated recommendations for the Cochrane rapid review methods guidance for rapid reviews of effectiveness
    Garritty, Chantelle
    Hamel, Candyce
    Trivella, Marialena
    Gartlehner, Gerald
    Nussbaumer-Streit, Barbara
    Devane, Declan
    Kamel, Chris
    Griebler, Ursula
    King, Valerie J.
    BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2024, 384
  • [8] Rapid reviews methods series: assessing the appropriateness of conducting a rapid review
    Garritty, Chantelle
    Nussbaumer-Streit, Barbara
    Hamel, Candyce
    Devane, Declan
    BMJ EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE, 2024,
  • [9] Rapid reviews methods series: Guidance on team considerations, study selection, data extraction and risk of bias assessment
    Nussbaumer-Streit, Barbara
    Sommer, Isolde
    Hamel, Candyce
    Devane, Declan
    Noel-Storr, Anna
    Puljak, Livia
    Trivella, Marialena
    Gartlehner, Gerald
    BMJ EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE, 2023, 28 (06) : 418 - 423
  • [10] Rapid review methods series: Guidance on the use of supportive software
    Affengruber, Lisa
    Nussbaumer-Streit, Barbara
    Hamel, Candyce
    van der Maten, Miriam
    Thomas, James
    Mavergames, Chris
    Spijker, Rene
    Gartlehner, Gerald
    BMJ EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE, 2024, 29 (04) : 264 - 271