Cost of pediatric laryngotracheal reconstruction: Differences between single-versus double-stage procedures

被引:2
|
作者
Drake, Marc [3 ]
Lyon, Danielle [3 ]
Martin, Timothy [3 ,4 ]
McCormick, Michael [3 ,4 ]
Jang, Minyoung [1 ,2 ]
Griffith, Cynthia [5 ]
Chun, Robert [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Columbia Univ, Med Ctr, New York, NY USA
[2] New York Presbyterian Morgan Stanley Childrens Ho, New York, NY USA
[3] Med Coll Wisconsin, Dept Otolaryngol, Milwaukee, WI USA
[4] Childrens Hosp Wisconsin, Div Pediat Otolaryngol, Milwaukee, WI USA
[5] Childrens Hosp Wisconsin, Trach Home Ventilator Program, Milwaukee, WI USA
关键词
Airway; Reconstruction; Cost; MANAGEMENT; SEDATION; CHILDREN;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijporl.2023.111496
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Objective: Examine differences in cost between single stage (ss) versus double stage (ds) laryngotracheal reconstruction (LTR) for pediatric subglottic stenosis. Study design: Retrospective chart review of children who underwent ssLTR or dsLTR from 2014 to 2018 at a single institution.Methods: Costs related to LTR and post-operative care up to one year after tracheostomy decannulation were extrapolated from charges billed to the patient. Charges were obtained from the hospital finance department and the local medical supplies company. Patient demographics including baseline severity of subglottic stenosis and co-morbidities were noted. Variables assessed include duration of hospital admission, number of ancillary procedures, duration of sedation wean, cost of tracheostomy maintenance, and time to tracheostomy decannulation.Results: Fifteen children underwent LTR for subglottic stenosis. D Ten patients underwent ssLTR, while five underwent dsLTR. Grade 3 subglottic stenosis was more prevalent in patients who underwent dsLTR (100%) than ssLTR (50%). The average per-patient hospital charges for ssLTR was $314,383 versus $183,638 for dsLTR. When estimated mean cost of tracheostomy supplies and nursing care until tracheostomy decannulation was included, the mean total charges associated with dsLTR patients was $269,456. Average hospital stay after initial surgery was 22 days for ssLTR versus 6 days for dsLTR. Average time to tracheostomy decannulation for dsLTR was 297 days. Average number of ancillary procedures needed was 3 versus 8 for ssLTR versus dsLTR.Conclusion: For pediatric patients with subglottic stenosis, dsLTR may have a lower cost than ssLTR. Although ssLTR has the benefit of immediate decannulation, it is associated with higher patient charges, as well as longer initial hospitalization and sedation. For both patient groups, fees associated with nursing care comprised the majority of charges. Recognizing the factors that contribute to cost differences between ssLTR and dsLTR may be useful when performing cost-benefit analyses and assessing value in health care delivery.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 8 条
  • [1] Single- vs Double-Stage Laryngotracheal Reconstruction
    Smith, Lee P.
    Zur, Karen B.
    Jacobs, Ian N.
    ARCHIVES OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 2010, 136 (01) : 60 - 65
  • [2] Comparison of Hybrid Laryngotracheal Reconstruction to Traditional Single- and Double-Stage Laryngotracheal Reconstruction
    Raol, Nikhila
    Rogers, Derek
    Setlur, Jennifer
    Hartnick, Christopher J.
    OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2015, 152 (03) : 524 - 529
  • [3] Novel Method for Laryngotracheal Reconstruction: Combining Single- and Double-Stage Techniques
    Setlur, Jennifer
    Maturo, Stephen
    Hartnick, Christopher J.
    ANNALS OF OTOLOGY RHINOLOGY AND LARYNGOLOGY, 2013, 122 (07): : 445 - 449
  • [4] The surgical treatment of acquired subglottic stenosis in children with double-stage laryngotracheal reconstruction
    Carta, Filippo
    Piras, Nicoletta
    Mariani, Cinzia
    Marrosu, Valeria
    Tatti, Melania
    Chuchueva, Natalia
    Bekpanov, Almat
    Medeulova, Aigul R.
    Shetty, Sanjana Ashik
    Puxeddu, Roberto
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, 2022, 158
  • [5] Outcomes Using a Postoperative Protocol in Pediatric Single-Stage Laryngotracheal Reconstruction
    Thottam, Prasad John
    Gilliland, Taylor
    Ettinger, Nicholas
    Baijal, Rahul
    Mehta, Deepak
    ANNALS OF OTOLOGY RHINOLOGY AND LARYNGOLOGY, 2021, 130 (08): : 861 - 867
  • [6] Systematic review/meta-analysis comparing successful outcomes after single vs. double-stage laryngotracheal reconstruction
    Padia, Reema
    Sjogren, Phayvanh
    Smith, Marshall
    Muntz, Harlan
    Stoddard, Gregory
    Meier, Jeremy
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, 2018, 108 : 168 - 174
  • [7] Hybrid laryngotracheal reconstruction vs single and double stage: Indications and outcomes
    Partain, Matthew P.
    Diercks, Gillian R.
    Horick, Nora
    Hartnick, Christopher J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, 2021, 151
  • [8] Postoperative management of pediatric patients undergoing single-stage laryngotracheal reconstruction in the United States: A survey of ASPO members
    Hazkani, Inbal
    Bruss, David
    Rowland, Matthew
    Valika, Taher
    Ida, Jonathan
    Thompson, Dana
    Lavin, Jennifer
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2025, 46 (01)