Patient experience of follow-up after surgery for kidney cancer: a focus group study

被引:9
作者
Harrison, Hannah [1 ,3 ]
Stewart, Grant D. [2 ]
Usher-Smith, Juliet A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cambridge, Dept Publ Hlth & Primary Care, Cambridge, England
[2] Univ Cambridge, Addenbrookes Hosp, Dept Surg, Cambridge, England
[3] Univ Cambridge, Ctr Canc Genet Epidemiol, Dept Publ Hlth & Primary Care, Addenbrookes Campus, Cambridge, England
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
kidney cancer; follow-up; surveillance; patient experience; focus group study; #kcsm; #KidneyCancer; #uroonc; RENAL-CELL CARCINOMA; CARE; NEEDS;
D O I
10.1111/bju.15982
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
ObjectiveTo explore patient experience of follow-up care after kidney cancer surgery and to develop recommendations for best practice. MethodsWe conducted two focus groups, including 14 participants with experience of kidney cancer follow-up after surgery, to elicit patient views on current follow-up care. Thematic analysis was used to identify unifying themes to describe the patient experience of follow-up, and the results were then used to develop a set of recommendations for best practice. ResultsWe identified six themes (feelings of abandonment; uncertainty about the plan; anxiety about appointments; variation in care; a need for information; and a need for emotional support) that described current patient experience and areas in which current care could be improved. In particular, while most of the participants felt that their physical needs had been met, many had struggled with unmet emotional needs and a lack of information and resources. This was especially noted in the period immediately following surgery, when feelings of abandonment were common, and around follow-up scans and routine appointments, which were a source of anxiety. Our participants also described concerns about the lack of consistency between different hospitals and centres around the United Kingdom, with differences in the content and quality of follow-up care. Based on the results, we developed a list of recommendations to address some of the challenges described through relatively minor changes to the care pathway. ConclusionsWe identified gaps and variability in current follow-up care after kidney cancer surgery, and have developed a set of recommendations that, if implemented, would improve the follow-up care experience for these patients.
引用
收藏
页码:47 / 55
页数:9
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   Free of malignancy but not of fears: A closer look at Damocles syndrome in survivors of hematologic malignancies [J].
Alabdaljabar, Mohamad S. ;
Muhsen, Ibrahim N. ;
Knight, Jennifer M. ;
Syrjala, Karen L. ;
Hashmi, Shahrukh K. .
BLOOD REVIEWS, 2021, 48
[2]   Effect of interventions including provision of personalised cancer risk information on accuracy of risk perception and psychological responses: A systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Bayne, Max ;
Fairey, Madi ;
Silarova, Barbora ;
Griffin, Simon J. ;
Sharp, Stephen J. ;
Klein, William M. P. ;
Sutton, Stephen ;
Usher-Smith, Juliet A. .
PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2020, 103 (01) :83-95
[3]   Fear of Cancer Recurrence in Patients With Localized Renal Cell Carcinoma [J].
Bergerot, Cristiane Decat ;
Battle, Dena ;
Philip, Errol J. ;
Bergerot, Paulo Gustavo ;
Msaouel, Pavlos ;
Smith, Allan 'Ben' ;
Bamgboje, Adeola Esther ;
Shuch, Brian ;
Derweesh, Ithaar H. ;
Jonasch, Eric ;
Stern, Adam P. ;
Pal, Sumanta K. ;
Staehler, Michael .
JCO ONCOLOGY PRACTICE, 2020, 16 (11) :743-+
[4]  
Cancer Research UK, 2018, KIDN CANC STAT
[5]   Follow-up After Treatment for Renal Cell Carcinoma: The Evidence Beyond the Guidelines [J].
Capogrosso, Paolo ;
Capitanio, Umberto ;
La Croce, Giovanni ;
Nini, Alessandro ;
Salonia, Andrea ;
Montorsi, Francesco ;
Bertini, Roberto .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY FOCUS, 2016, 1 (03) :272-281
[6]   Increased use of cross-sectional imaging for follow-up does not improve post-recurrence survival of surgically treated initially localized RCC: results from a European multicenter database (RECUR) [J].
Dabestani, Saeed ;
Beisland, Christian ;
Stewart, Grant D. ;
Bensalah, Karim ;
Gudmundsson, Eirikur ;
Lam, Thomas B. ;
Gietzmann, William ;
Zakikhani, Paimaun ;
Marconi, Lorenzo ;
Fernandez-Pello, Sergio ;
Monagas, Serenella ;
Williams, Samuel P. ;
Powles, Thomas ;
Van Werkhovenn, Erik ;
Meijer, Richard ;
Volpe, Alessandro ;
Staehler, Michael ;
Ljungberg, Borje ;
Bex, Axel .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 53 (01) :14-20
[7]   Renal cell carcinoma: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up [J].
Escudier, B. ;
Porta, C. ;
Schmidinger, M. ;
Rioux-Leclercq, N. ;
Bex, A. ;
Khoo, V. ;
Grunwald, V. ;
Gillessen, S. ;
Horwich, A. .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2019, 30 (05) :706-720
[8]   Improving Survivorship Care for Patients With Colorectal Cancer [J].
Faul, Leigh Anne ;
Shibata, David ;
Townsend, Ione ;
Jacobsen, Paul B. .
CANCER CONTROL, 2010, 17 (01) :35-43
[9]   Patient-reported Experience of Diagnosis, Management, and Burden of Renal Cell Carcinomas: Results from a Global Patient Survey in 43 Countries [J].
Giles, Rachel ;
Maskens, Deborah ;
Bick, Robert ;
Martinez, Robin ;
Packer, Malcolm ;
Heng, Daniel ;
Larkin, James ;
Bex, Axel ;
Jewett, Michael ;
Jonasch, Eric ;
MacLennan, Sara .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY OPEN SCIENCE, 2022, 37 :3-6
[10]   Patients' and healthcare professionals' views of cancer follow-up: systematic review [J].
Lewis, Ruth A. ;
Neal, Richard D. ;
Hendry, Maggie ;
France, Barbara ;
Williams, Nefyn H. ;
Russell, Daphne ;
Hughes, Dyfrig A. ;
Russell, Ian ;
Stuart, Nicholas S. A. ;
Weller, David ;
Wilkinson, Clare .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2009, 59 (564) :533-540