Classical and modern prejudice towards individuals with intellectual disabilities: A study on a sample of Italian university students

被引:3
作者
Servidio, Rocco [1 ]
Marcone, Roberto [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calabria, Dept Cultures Educ & Soc, Bldg Cube 18-B, I-87036 Cosenza, Italy
[2] Univ Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Dept Psychol, Caserta, Italy
关键词
Prejudice; intellectual disabilities; intergroup contact; Big Five; empathy; intergroup anxiety; INTERGROUP ANXIETY; ATTITUDES; CONTACT; PEOPLE; PERSONALITY; EMPATHY; INTERVENTIONS; METAANALYSIS; ASSOCIATION; PREDICTORS;
D O I
10.1080/03623319.2020.1799176
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
The present study aims to explore classical and modern prejudice towards individuals with Intellectual Disabilities (ID) among a sample of Italian university students who attend Social Sciences and Physical Sciences degree courses. A convenience sample of 280 university students (51.4% doing Social Sciences degrees, and 48.6% doing Physical Sciences degrees) participated in this research. Two separate hierarchical multiple regression analyses were carried out to examine the relationship between the variables in order to identify which predictors affect the expression of prejudice towards people with ID. The results showed that classical prejudice was predicted by males, no prior work experience with individuals with ID, Big Five, personality traits such as agreeableness and openness, low reactive empathy, reduced quality of contact, and intergroup anxiety. Modern prejudice was predicted by males, students who attended Physical Sciences degree courses, no prior work experience with individuals with ID, low parallel and reactive empathy. Limitations and practical implications are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:125 / 137
页数:13
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]   Classical and modern prejudice: Attitudes toward people with intellectual disabilities [J].
Akrami, Nazar ;
Ekehammar, Bo ;
Claesson, Malin ;
Sonnander, Karin .
RESEARCH IN DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES, 2006, 27 (06) :605-617
[2]   Generalized Prejudice: Common and Specific Components [J].
Akrami, Nazar ;
Ekehammar, Bo ;
Bergh, Robin .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2011, 22 (01) :57-59
[3]  
Allport GW., 1954, NATURE PREJUDICE
[4]  
American Psychiatric Association, 2013, DIAGN STAT MAN MENT, DOI 10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596
[5]   Interventions utilising contact with people with disabilities to improve children's attitudes towards disability: A systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Armstrong, Megan ;
Morris, Christopher ;
Abraham, Charles ;
Tarrant, Mark .
DISABILITY AND HEALTH JOURNAL, 2017, 10 (01) :11-22
[6]   Children's contact with people with disabilities and their attitudes towards disability: a cross-sectional study [J].
Armstrong, Megan ;
Morris, Christopher ;
Abraham, Charles ;
Ukoumunne, Obioha C. ;
Tarrant, Mark .
DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2016, 38 (09) :879-888
[7]  
Associazione Italiana di Psicologia, 2015, COD ET
[8]  
Barlow F. K., 2018, CAMBRIDGE HDB PSYCHO, DOI [10.1017/9781108661911.001, DOI 10.1017/9781108661911.001]
[9]   Rejected! Cognitions of rejection and intergroup anxiety as mediators of the impact of cross-group friendships on prejudice [J].
Barlow, Fiona Kate ;
Louis, Winnifred R. ;
Hewstone, Miles .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2009, 48 (03) :389-405
[10]   Empathy, attitudes, and action: Can feeling for a member of a stigmatized group motivate one to help the group? [J].
Batson, CD ;
Chang, J ;
Orr, R ;
Rowland, J .
PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN, 2002, 28 (12) :1656-1666