Reasoning about reasoning - using recall to unveil clinical reasoning in stroke rehabilitation teams

被引:1
作者
Elven, Maria [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Prenkert, Malin [2 ]
Holmstrom, Inger K. [1 ,3 ]
Edelbring, Samuel [2 ]
机构
[1] Malardalen Univ, Sch Hlth Care & Social Welf, Vasteras, Sweden
[2] Orebro Univ, Fac Med & Hlth, Sch Hlth Sci, Orebro, Sweden
[3] Uppsala Univ, Dept Publ Hlth & Caring Sci, Uppsala, Sweden
[4] Malardalen Univ, Sch Hlth Care & Social Welf, Box 883, S-72123 Vasteras, Sweden
关键词
Clinical reasoning; decision-making; participation; person-centered care; stimulated recall; stroke care; stroke rehabilitation; SHARED DECISION-MAKING; PERSON-CENTERED CARE; MODEL; SATISFACTION; ENHANCE;
D O I
10.1080/09638288.2024.2320263
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
PurposeThe study objective was to investigate how health care providers in stroke teams reason about their clinical reasoning process in collaboration with the patient and next of kin.Materials and methodsAn explorative qualitative design using stimulated recall was employed. Audio-recordings from three rehabilitation dialogs were used as prompts in interviews with the involved staff about their clinical reasoning. A thematic analysis approach was employed.ResultsA main finding was the apparent friction between profession-centered and person-centered clinical reasoning, which was salient in the data. Five themes were identified: the importance of different perspectives for a rich picture and well-informed decisions; shared understanding in analysis and decision-making - good intentions but difficult to achieve; the health care providers' expertise directs the dialog; the context's impact on the rehabilitation dialog; and insights about missed opportunities to grasp the patient perspective and arrive at decisions.ConclusionsInterprofessional stroke teams consider clinical reasoning as a process valuing patient and next of kin perspectives; however, their professional expertise risks preventing individual needs from surfacing. There is a discrepancy between professionals' intentions for person-centeredness and how clinical reasoning plays out. Stimulated recall can unveil person-centered practice and enhance professionals' awareness of their clinical reasoning. The findings provide insights into the clinical reasoning process of interprofessional stroke teams, which can increase awareness and support the development of competencies among health care providers.To increase patient participation in the clinical reasoning process, stroke teams are recommended to clarify the function of goals and the decision-making process in management.Stimulated recall is recommended as a reflective activity in the work of stroke teams to develop awareness and skills in clinical reasoning performed in collaboration between health care providers and patients.
引用
收藏
页码:6086 / 6096
页数:11
相关论文
共 45 条
  • [11] Person-centered care - Ready for prime time
    Ekman, Inger
    Swedberg, Karl
    Taft, Charles
    Lindseth, Anders
    Norberg, Astrid
    Brink, Eva
    Carlsson, Jane
    Dahlin-Ivanoff, Synneve
    Johansson, Inga-Lill
    Kjellgren, Karin
    Liden, Eva
    Ohlen, Joakim
    Olsson, Lars-Eric
    Rosen, Henrik
    Rydmark, Martin
    Sunnerhagen, Katharina Stibrant
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR NURSING, 2011, 10 (04) : 248 - 251
  • [12] A tension between surrendering and being involved: An interview study on person-centeredness in clinical reasoning in the acute stroke setting
    Elven, Maria
    Holmstrom, Inger K.
    Carlestav, Malin
    Edelbring, Samuel
    [J]. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2023, 112
  • [13] A clinical reasoning model focused on clients' behaviour change with reference to physiotherapists: its multiphase development and validation
    Elven, Maria
    Hochwalder, Jacek
    Dean, Elizabeth
    Soderlund, Anne
    [J]. PHYSIOTHERAPY THEORY AND PRACTICE, 2015, 31 (04) : 231 - 243
  • [14] Stroke survivors' experiences of team support along their recovery continuum
    Hartford, W.
    Lear, S.
    Nimmon, L.
    [J]. BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2019, 19 (01)
  • [15] Developing a European longitudinal and interprofessional curriculum for clinical reasoning
    Hege, Inga
    Adler, Martin
    Donath, Daniel
    Durning, Steven J.
    Edelbring, Samuel
    Elven, Maria
    Bogusz, Ada
    Georg, Carina
    Huwendiek, Soren
    Koerner, Melina
    Kononowicz, Andrzej A.
    Parodis, Ioannis
    Sodergren, Ulrika
    Wagner, Felicitas L.
    Edstrom, Desiree Wiegleb
    [J]. DIAGNOSIS, 2023, 10 (03) : 218 - 224
  • [16] Clinical Reasoning in Physical Therapy: A Concept Analysis
    Huhn, Karen
    Gilliland, Sarah J.
    Black, Lisa L.
    Wainwright, Susan F.
    Christensen, Nicole
    [J]. PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2019, 99 (04): : 440 - 456
  • [17] Consequences of stroke in the light of objective and subjective indices: A review of recent literature
    Jaracz, Krystyna
    Grabowska-Fudala, Barbara
    Gorna, Krystyna
    Kozubski, Wojciech
    [J]. NEUROLOGIA I NEUROCHIRURGIA POLSKA, 2014, 48 (04) : 280 - 286
  • [18] Person-Centered Rehabilitation Model: Framing the Concept and Practice of Person-Centered Adult Physical Rehabilitation Based on a Scoping Review and Thematic Analysis of the Literature
    Jesus, Tiago S.
    Papadimitriou, Christina
    Bright, Felicity A.
    Kayes, Nicola M.
    Pinho, Catia S.
    Cott, Cheryl A.
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2022, 103 (01): : 106 - 120
  • [19] Collaborative Clinical Reasoning-A Systematic Review of Empirical Studies
    Kiesewetter, Jan
    Fischer, Frank
    Fischer, Martin R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONTINUING EDUCATION IN THE HEALTH PROFESSIONS, 2017, 37 (02) : 123 - 128
  • [20] The Importance of Patient Involvement in Stroke Rehabilitation
    Kristensen, Hanne Kaae
    Tistad, Malin
    von Koch, Lena
    Ytterberg, Charlotte
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (06):