Reasoning about reasoning - using recall to unveil clinical reasoning in stroke rehabilitation teams

被引:1
作者
Elven, Maria [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Prenkert, Malin [2 ]
Holmstrom, Inger K. [1 ,3 ]
Edelbring, Samuel [2 ]
机构
[1] Malardalen Univ, Sch Hlth Care & Social Welf, Vasteras, Sweden
[2] Orebro Univ, Fac Med & Hlth, Sch Hlth Sci, Orebro, Sweden
[3] Uppsala Univ, Dept Publ Hlth & Caring Sci, Uppsala, Sweden
[4] Malardalen Univ, Sch Hlth Care & Social Welf, Box 883, S-72123 Vasteras, Sweden
关键词
Clinical reasoning; decision-making; participation; person-centered care; stimulated recall; stroke care; stroke rehabilitation; SHARED DECISION-MAKING; PERSON-CENTERED CARE; MODEL; SATISFACTION; ENHANCE;
D O I
10.1080/09638288.2024.2320263
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
PurposeThe study objective was to investigate how health care providers in stroke teams reason about their clinical reasoning process in collaboration with the patient and next of kin.Materials and methodsAn explorative qualitative design using stimulated recall was employed. Audio-recordings from three rehabilitation dialogs were used as prompts in interviews with the involved staff about their clinical reasoning. A thematic analysis approach was employed.ResultsA main finding was the apparent friction between profession-centered and person-centered clinical reasoning, which was salient in the data. Five themes were identified: the importance of different perspectives for a rich picture and well-informed decisions; shared understanding in analysis and decision-making - good intentions but difficult to achieve; the health care providers' expertise directs the dialog; the context's impact on the rehabilitation dialog; and insights about missed opportunities to grasp the patient perspective and arrive at decisions.ConclusionsInterprofessional stroke teams consider clinical reasoning as a process valuing patient and next of kin perspectives; however, their professional expertise risks preventing individual needs from surfacing. There is a discrepancy between professionals' intentions for person-centeredness and how clinical reasoning plays out. Stimulated recall can unveil person-centered practice and enhance professionals' awareness of their clinical reasoning. The findings provide insights into the clinical reasoning process of interprofessional stroke teams, which can increase awareness and support the development of competencies among health care providers.To increase patient participation in the clinical reasoning process, stroke teams are recommended to clarify the function of goals and the decision-making process in management.Stimulated recall is recommended as a reflective activity in the work of stroke teams to develop awareness and skills in clinical reasoning performed in collaboration between health care providers and patients.
引用
收藏
页码:6086 / 6096
页数:11
相关论文
共 45 条
  • [2] Braun V., 2022, Thematic analysis: A practical guide, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-69909-7_3470-2
  • [3] A qualitative investigation into the patient-centered goal-setting practices of allied health clinicians working in rehabilitation
    Cameron, Lisa J.
    Somerville, Lisa M.
    Naismith, Catherine E.
    Watterson, Dina
    Maric, Valentina
    Lannin, Natasha A.
    [J]. CLINICAL REHABILITATION, 2018, 32 (06) : 827 - 840
  • [4] Scripts and clinical reasoning
    Charlin, Bernard
    Boshuizen, Henny P. A.
    Custers, Eugene J.
    Feltovich, Paul J.
    [J]. MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2007, 41 (12) : 1178 - 1184
  • [5] Management Reasoning: Implications for Health Professions Educators and a Research Agenda
    Cook, David A.
    Durning, Steven J.
    Sherbino, Jonathan
    Gruppen, Larry D.
    [J]. ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2019, 94 (09) : 1310 - 1316
  • [6] Updated guidance for trusted systematic reviews: a new edition of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions
    Cumpston, Miranda
    Li, Tianjing
    Page, Matthew J.
    Chandler, Jacqueline
    Welch, Vivian A.
    Higgins, Julian P. T.
    Thomas, James
    [J]. COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2019, (10):
  • [7] Setting meaningful goals in rehabilitation: rationale and practical tool
    Dekker, Joost
    de Groot, Vincent
    ter Steeg, Anne Marie
    Vloothuis, Judith
    Holla, Jasmijn
    Collette, Emma
    Satink, Ton
    Post, Lenneke
    Doodeman, Suzan
    Littooij, Elsbeth
    [J]. CLINICAL REHABILITATION, 2020, 34 (01) : 3 - 12
  • [8] Durning SJ, 2013, ACAD MED, V88, P442, DOI [10.1097/ACM.0b013e3182851b5b, 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3182953763]
  • [9] A systematic review on implementation of person-centered care interventions for older people in out-of-hospital settings
    Ebrahimi, Zahra
    Patel, Harshida
    Wijk, Helle
    Ekman, Inger
    Olaya-Contreras, Patricia
    [J]. GERIATRIC NURSING, 2021, 42 (01) : 213 - 224
  • [10] "Same same or different?" A review of reviews of person-centered and patient-centered care
    Eklund, Jakob Hakansson
    Holmstrom, Inger K.
    Kumlin, Tomas
    Kaminsky, Elenor
    Skoglund, Karin
    Hoglander, Jessica
    Sundler, Annelie J.
    Conden, Emelie
    Meranius, Martina Summer
    [J]. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2019, 102 (01) : 3 - 11