Electrical circuit modeling of proton exchange membrane electrolyzer: The state-of-the-art, current challenges, and recommendations

被引:24
作者
Ratib, Mohamed Khalid [1 ]
Muttaqi, Kashem M. [1 ]
Islam, Md Rabiul [1 ]
Sutanto, Danny [1 ]
Agalgaonkar, Ashish P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wollongong, Australian Power & Energy Res Inst APERI, Fac Engn & Informat Sci, Sch Elect Comp & Telecommun Engn, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia
关键词
PEM electrolyzer; Electrical circuit modeling; Renewable energy sources; PEM electrolyzer modeling; Generation of hydrogen from RESs; HYDROGEN-PRODUCTION; STORAGE-SYSTEM; PEM; ENERGY; PERFORMANCE; SIMULATION; POWER; PARAMETERS; EFFICIENCY; IDENTIFICATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.08.319
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
The integration of water electrolysis with renewable energy sources (RESs) constitutes a milestone in the transition to neutral and sustainable energy systems. The attractive features of the Proton Exchange Membrane (PEM) electrolyzer such as high purity of hydrogen, operation with high pressure, and high current densities have made it a critical technology to produce green hydrogen from RESs. Accurate models are required for proper design, analysis, and control of the electrolyzer when connected to the grid or renewable energy systems. Amongst the various types of models proposed for modeling the PEM electrolyzer, electrical circuit models are the easiest, most appealing, and straightforward to use for the investigation of electrolyzer operation and control. This paper presents an exhaustive review of the electrical circuit modeling reported in the literature on PEM electrolyzers. The reviewed models are classified analogously to the classifications of physical modeling in terms of voltage components (reversible, ohmic, activation, and concentration voltage drop), model behavior (static/dynamic), and modeling scale (cell/ stack). Furthermore, MATLAB simulations of the reviewed models are implemented and the results are compared to pinpoint their similarities and deviations. Moreover, the applications, challenges, benefits, and drawbacks of the electrolyzer's electrical equivalent circuit modeling are discussed and overarching recommendations are set out for further
引用
收藏
页码:625 / 645
页数:21
相关论文
共 93 条
[1]   Novel Analytical Approach for Parameters Identification of PEM Electrolyzer [J].
Abomazid, Abdulrahman M. ;
El-Taweel, Nader A. ;
Farag, Hany E. Z. .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL INFORMATICS, 2022, 18 (09) :5870-5881
[2]   Electrochemical Optimization Model for Parameters Identification of PEM Electrolyzer [J].
Abomazid, Abdulrahman M. ;
El-Taweel, Nader A. ;
Farag, Hany E. Z. .
2020 IEEE ELECTRIC POWER AND ENERGY CONFERENCE (EPEC), 2020,
[3]   Multiphysics simulation of a PEM electrolyser: Energetic Macroscopic Representation approach [J].
Agbli, K. S. ;
Pera, M. C. ;
Hissel, D. ;
Rallieres, O. ;
Turpin, C. ;
Doumbia, I. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2011, 36 (02) :1382-1398
[4]   Developing a thermally compensated electrolyser model coupled with pressurised hydrogen storage for modelling the energy efficiency of hydrogen energy storage systems and identifying their operation performance issues [J].
Ali, Dallia ;
Gazey, Ross ;
Aklil, Daniel .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2016, 66 :27-37
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2019, AUSTRALIAS NATL HYDR
[6]   Hydrogen electrolyser technologies and their modelling for sustainable energy production: A comprehensive review and suggestions [J].
Arsad, A. Z. ;
Hannan, M. A. ;
Al-Shetwi, Ali Q. ;
Begum, R. A. ;
Hossain, M. J. ;
Ker, Pin Jern ;
Mahlia, T. M. Indra .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2023, 48 (72) :27841-27871
[7]   Equivalent electrical model for a proton exchange membrane (PEM) electrolyser [J].
Atlam, Ozcan ;
Kolhe, Mohan .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2011, 52 (8-9) :2952-2957
[8]   An experimental and modelling study of a photovoltaic/proton-exchange membrane electrolyser system [J].
Atlam, Ozcan .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2009, 34 (16) :6589-6595
[9]  
Ayivor P, 2018, P 3 INT HYBR POW SYS, P8
[10]  
Chiesa N., 2011, P INT C POW SYST TRA