Social media, disinformation, and democracy: how different types of social media usage affect democracy cross-nationally

被引:8
作者
Hunter, Lance Y. [1 ]
机构
[1] Augusta Univ, Dept Social Sci, Augusta, GA 30912 USA
关键词
Social media; disinformation; political polarization; democracy; democratic norms; LATIN-AMERICA; EDUCATION; INTERNET; INSTITUTIONS; ATTAINMENT; POLLUTION; MODELS; INCOME; PANEL;
D O I
10.1080/13510347.2023.2208355
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
Much speculation exists regarding how social media impacts the health of democracies. However, minimal scholarly research empirically examines the effect social media has on democracy across multiple states and regions. Thus, this article analyses the effect social media and disinformation transmitted over social media have on democracy. The findings from a cross-national, time-series analysis of 158 states from 2000-2019 indicate that different types of social media usage have varying effects on democracy. General social media consumption, the presence of diverse political viewpoints on social media, and the use of social media in political campaigns bolster democracy. However, social media disinformation, online political polarization, and the use of social media to organize offline violence reduce overall levels of democracy. In addition, a mediation analysis is conducted to identify the precise linkages between social media disinformation and democracy and indicates that government and political party disinformation impact democracy by weakening key democratic norms.
引用
收藏
页码:1040 / 1072
页数:33
相关论文
共 103 条
  • [1] Achen C.H., 2000, ANN M POL METH SECT, V20, P7, DOI DOI 10.1093/0199276382.001.0001
  • [2] Aday S., 2012, Blogs and bullets 2: New media and conflict after the arab spring
  • [3] Measuring the efficiency of health systems in Asia: a data envelopment analysis
    Ahmed, Sayem
    Hasan, Md Zahid
    MacLennan, Mary
    Dorin, Farzana
    Ahmed, Mohammad Wahid
    Hasan, Md Mehedi
    Hasan, Shaikh Mehdi
    Islam, Mohammad Touhidul
    Khan, Jahangir A. M.
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2019, 9 (03):
  • [4] Conspiracy theories, election rigging, and support for democratic norms
    Albertson, Bethany
    Guiler, Kimberly
    [J]. RESEARCH & POLITICS, 2020, 7 (03)
  • [5] Allen Summer., 2019, AM PSYCHOL ASS
  • [6] The effects of capital mobility, trade openness, and democracy on social spending in Latin America, 1980-1999
    Avelino, G
    Brown, DS
    Hunter, W
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2005, 49 (03) : 625 - 641
  • [7] Barbera P., How Social Media Reduces Mass Political Polarization
  • [8] A new data set of educational attainment in the world, 1950-2010
    Barro, Robert J.
    Lee, Jong Wha
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 2013, 104 : 184 - 198
  • [9] BECK N, 1995, AM POLIT SCI REV, V89, P634, DOI 10.2307/2082979
  • [10] Random coefficient models for time-series-cross-section data: Monte Carlo experiments
    Beck, Nathaniel
    Katz, Jonathan N.
    [J]. POLITICAL ANALYSIS, 2007, 15 (02) : 182 - 195