AVO Inversion Based on Closed-Loop Multitask Conditional Wasserstein Generative Adversarial Network

被引:12
作者
Wang, Zixu [1 ]
Wang, Shoudong [1 ]
Zhou, Chen [1 ]
Cheng, Wanli [1 ]
机构
[1] China Univ Petr, State Key Lab Petr Resources & Prospecting, Natl Engn Lab Offshore Oil Explorat, Beijing 102249, Peoples R China
来源
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING | 2023年 / 61卷
关键词
Generative adversarial networks; Multitasking; Feature extraction; Robustness; Convolutional neural networks; Impedance; Convolution; Amplitude variation with offset (AVO) inversion; closed-loop structure; conditional generative adversarial network (cGAN); Wasserstein generative adversarial network (WGAN); PRESTACK SEISMIC INVERSION; NEURAL-NETWORK; DISCRIMINATION;
D O I
10.1109/TGRS.2023.3260908
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
Neural networks are commonly used for poststack and prestack seismic inversion. With sufficient labeled data, the neural network-based seismic inversion results are more accurate than that use traditional seismic inversion methods. However, in the case of insufficient labeled data, the accuracy of neural networks-based seismic inversion results decreases and is even lower than those based on the traditional inversion methods. In addition, the seismic inversion results based on neural networks generally suffer from lateral discontinuity. It further reduces the accuracy of the inversion results. To tackle these problems, we propose a prestack seismic amplitude variation with offset (AVO) inversion method based on closed-loop multitask conditional Wasserstein generative adversarial network (CMcWGAN), which is a generative adversarial network (GAN)-based AVO inversion method. CMcWGAN enables simultaneous and accurate inversion of P-wave velocity (V p), S-wave velocity (Vs), and density (rho). Moreover, it uses the low-frequency information of elastic parameters as a conditional input to alleviate the problem of lateral discontinuity in inversion results. Experimental results of simulated data show that the inversion results based on CMcWGAN have higher accuracy than those based on the traditional AVO inversion methods. In addition, when the seismic angle gather is noisy, CMcWGAN has better robustness than the traditional methods. CMcWGAN can also obtain reasonable AVO inversion results in field seismic angle gather data. Experimental results of simulated data show that the inversion results based on CMcWGAN have higher accuracy than those based on the traditional AVO inversion method. In addition, when the seismic angle gather is noisy, CMcWGAN has better robustness than the traditional method. CMcWGAN can also get reasonable AVO inversion results in field seismic angle gather data.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]  
Aki K., 1980, Quantitative seismology
[2]   High-resolution three-term AVO inversion by means of a Trivariate Cauchy probability distribution [J].
Alemie, Wubshet ;
Sacchi, Mauricio D. .
GEOPHYSICS, 2011, 76 (03) :R43-R55
[3]  
Alfarraj M., 2019, SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts, P2298, DOI DOI 10.1190/SEGAM2019-3215902.1
[4]   Semisupervised sequence modeling for elastic impedance inversion [J].
Alfarraj, Motaz ;
AlRegib, Ghassan .
INTERPRETATION-A JOURNAL OF SUBSURFACE CHARACTERIZATION, 2019, 7 (03) :SE237-SE249
[5]   A Bayesian Method for Incorporating Self-Similarity Into Earthquake Slip Inversions [J].
Amey, R. M. J. ;
Hooper, A. ;
Walters, R. J. .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SOLID EARTH, 2018, 123 (07) :6052-6071
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2006, Geophysics
[7]   Deep learning-driven velocity model building workflow [J].
Araya-Polo M. ;
Farris S. ;
Florez M. .
Leading Edge, 2019, 38 (11) :872A1-872A9
[8]  
Arjovsky M, 2017, Arxiv, DOI [arXiv:1701.07875, 10.48550/arXiv.1701.07875]
[9]  
Biswas R., 2019, SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2019, V2019, P4967, DOI 10.1190/segam2019-3215071.1
[10]   Prestack and poststack inversion using a physics-guided convolutional neural network [J].
Biswas, Reetam ;
Sen, Mrinal K. ;
Das, Vishal ;
Mukerji, Tapan .
INTERPRETATION-A JOURNAL OF SUBSURFACE CHARACTERIZATION, 2019, 7 (03) :SE161-SE174