Impact of climate policy uncertainty on traditional energy and green markets: Evidence from time-varying granger tests

被引:259
作者
Ren, Xiaohang [1 ]
Li, Jingyao [1 ]
He, Feng [2 ]
Lucey, Brian [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Cent South Univ, Sch Business, Hunan 410083, Peoples R China
[2] Capital Univ Econ & Business, Sch Finance, Beijing 100070, Peoples R China
[3] Trinity Coll Dublin, Trinity Business Sch, Dublin, Ireland
[4] Univ Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi, U Arab Emirates
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Time-varying granger test; Climate policy uncertainty; Traditional energy; Green markets; Bidirectional causality; PRICES; CAUSALITY; FRAMEWORK; INFERENCE; MONEY; RISK; OIL;
D O I
10.1016/j.rser.2022.113058
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Extreme weather anomalies act as threat multipliers, warning us to focus on low-carbon transition and sus-tainable development. This study analyses the dynamic bidirectional causality between climate policy uncer-tainty (CPU) and traditional energy, represented by oil, coal, and natural gas, as well as green markets, represented by clean energy, green bonds, and carbon trading. This research provides the first comprehensive assessment of CPUs across multiple dimensions of different energy properties, causal spillover directions, and temporal heterogeneity using the time-varying Granger test. The results indicate that significant dynamic cau-sality exists within each series rather than the entire period, and that causality manifests differently between pairs of series. In addition, CPU is more inclined to act as a risk recipient than a sender in the market volatility spillover. Whenever extreme climate events or major climate policy changes are encountered, the causal rela-tionship between CPU and the relevant markets will rise significantly. Overall, governments should pay attention to the role of climate policy implementation in energy transition as well as attempt to reduce uncertainty.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 75 条
[1]   Pricing climate-related risks in the bond market [J].
Agliardi, Elettra ;
Agliardi, Rossella .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL STABILITY, 2021, 54
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1996, Econometric Reviews, DOI [DOI 10.1080/07474939608800362, 10.1080/07474939608800362]
[3]   The dynamics of U.S. industrial production: A time-varying Granger causality perspective [J].
Baum, Christopher F. ;
Hurn, Stan ;
Otero, Jesus .
ECONOMETRICS AND STATISTICS, 2025, 33 :13-22
[4]   The power of ESG transparency: The effect of the new SFDR sustainability labels on mutual funds and individual investors [J].
Becker, Martin G. ;
Martin, Fabio ;
Walter, Andreas .
FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2022, 47
[5]   Carbon lock-in through capital stock inertia associated with weak near-term climate policies [J].
Bertram, Christoph ;
Johnson, Nils ;
Luderer, Gunnar ;
Riahi, Keyvvan ;
Isaac, Morna ;
Eom, Jiyong .
TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2015, 90 :62-72
[6]   Do investors care about carbon risk? [J].
Bolton, Patrick ;
Kacperczyk, Marcin .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2021, 142 (02) :517-549
[7]   Climate policy uncertainty and the price dynamics of green and brown energy stocks [J].
Bouri, Elie ;
Iqbal, Najaf ;
Klein, Tony .
FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2022, 47
[8]   A coal elimination treaty 2030: Fast tracking climate change mitigation, global health and security [J].
Burke, Anthony ;
Fishel, Stefanie .
EARTH SYSTEM GOVERNANCE, 2020, 3
[9]   Hedging climate risks with green assets [J].
Cepni, Oguzhan ;
Demirer, Riza ;
Rognone, Lavinia .
ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2022, 212
[10]   Quantile time-frequency price connectedness between green bond, green equity, sustainable investments and clean energy markets [J].
Chatziantoniou, Ioannis ;
Abakah, Emmanuel Joel Aikins ;
Gabauer, David ;
Tiwari, Aviral Kumar .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2022, 361