Comparative analysis of CMIP5 and CMIP6 in conjunction with the hydrological processes of reservoir catchment, Chhattisgarh, India

被引:21
作者
Verma, Shashikant [1 ]
Kumar, Kislay [1 ]
Verma, Mani Kant [1 ]
Prasad, A. D. [1 ]
Mehta, Darshan [2 ]
Rathnayake, Upaka [3 ]
机构
[1] Natl Inst Technol, Civil Engn Dept, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, India
[2] Dr S&S S Ghandhy Govt Engn Coll, Dept Civil Engn, Surat, Gujarat, India
[3] Atlantic Technol Univ, Fac Engn & Design, Dept Civil & Construct, Ash Lane, Sligo F91YW50, Ireland
关键词
Climate change; CMIP5 and CMIP6 comparison; Demand forecasting; Hydrological processes; Performance evaluation; Reservoir optimization; Water availability; RAINFALL-RUNOFF MODELS; CLIMATE-CHANGE IMPACTS; MAHANADI RIVER-BASIN; MINIMUM TEMPERATURE; WATER-RESOURCES; MAXIMUM TEMPERATURE; CHANGING CLIMATE; BIAS-CORRECTION; STREAMFLOW; PRECIPITATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejrh.2023.101533
中图分类号
TV21 [水资源调查与水利规划];
学科分类号
081501 ;
摘要
Study region: Mahanadi reservoir project complex (MRP), Chhattisgarh, India Study focus: This study assesses and compares the performance of the Coupled Model Intercom-parison Project Phase 5 (CMIP5) and CMIP6 models in modeling the hydrological regime. The study compared the performance of 13 CMIP6 GCMs in two Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (SSEPs) with that of 16 CMIP5 GCMs in two Representative Concentration Pathways (RCPs). Before being used to drive the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) for streamflow prediction, the raw CMIP outputs were adjusted and downscaled using Bias Correction and Spatial Disag-gregation methods (BCSD). In addition, the water deficits were also assessed between the mean monthly released by the optimized model and the mean monthly water demand. Results of this research projected the domestic water demand for future scenarios (2023-2099). New hydrological insights for the study region: The results of this study revealed that the genetic algorithm (GA) outperforms the various optimization techniques for CMIP5, with deficits observed by the GA algorithm. In addition, CCCmaCanESM2 was found to be the most efficient among CMIP5 GCMs, whereas MPI-ESM1-2-HR was used for CMIP6 GCMs. Overall, the CMIP6 multi-model mean ensemble (MMME) outperformed the CMIP5 MMME in simulating streamflow over the study area at annual and seasonal timescales. CMIP6 MMME also reduced maximum and minimum temperature biases over the study region significantly. In overall conclusion, the CMIP6 ensemble offers a lower margin of uncertainty for future climate projections and better credibility for hydrological effect analysis. The results further indicate that satisfactory steam flows can be obtained from the SWAT model while slight underestimations can be seen for higher discharges. In addition, the projected domestic water demand based on future population and irrigation demand clearly showcases significant annual increases.
引用
收藏
页数:42
相关论文
共 159 条
[71]   Extreme Precipitation Indices over China in CMIP5 Models. Part I: Model Evaluation [J].
Jiang, Zhihong ;
Li, Wei ;
Xu, Jianjun ;
Li, Laurent .
JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2015, 28 (21) :8603-8619
[72]   An Assessment of GCM Skill in Simulating Persistence across Multiple Time Scales [J].
Johnson, Fiona ;
Westra, Seth ;
Sharma, Ashish ;
Pitman, Andrew J. .
JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2011, 24 (14) :3609-3623
[73]  
Kendall M. G., 1948, Rank correlation methods.
[74]   Performance Assessment of General Circulation Model in Simulating Daily Precipitation and Temperature Using Multiple Gridded Datasets [J].
Khan, Najeebullah ;
Shahid, Shamsuddin ;
Ahmed, Kamal ;
Ismail, Tarmizi ;
Nawaz, Nadeem ;
Son, Minwoo .
WATER, 2018, 10 (12)
[75]   Impacts of changes in climate and land use/land cover under IPCC RCP scenarios on streamflow in the Hoeya River Basin, Korea [J].
Kim, Jinsoo ;
Choi, Jisun ;
Choi, Chuluong ;
Park, Soyoung .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2013, 452 :181-195
[76]   Climate change and uncertainty assessment over a hydroclimatic transect of Michigan [J].
Kim, Jongho ;
Ivanov, Valeriy Y. ;
Fatichi, Simone .
STOCHASTIC ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND RISK ASSESSMENT, 2016, 30 (03) :923-944
[77]   Evaluation of the CMIP6 multi-model ensemble for climate extreme indices [J].
Kim, Yeon-Hee ;
Min, Seung-Ki ;
Zhang, Xuebin ;
Sillmann, Jana ;
Sandstad, Marit .
WEATHER AND CLIMATE EXTREMES, 2020, 29
[78]   The SPAtial EFficiency metric (SPAEF): multiple-component evaluation of spatial patterns for optimization of hydrological models [J].
Koch, Julian ;
Demirel, Mehmet Cuneyd ;
Stisen, Simon .
GEOSCIENTIFIC MODEL DEVELOPMENT, 2018, 11 (05) :1873-1886
[79]   Plant Physiological Responses to Rising CO2 Modify Simulated Daily Runoff Intensity With Implications for Global-Scale Flood Risk Assessment [J].
Kooperman, Gabriel J. ;
Fowler, Megan D. ;
Hoffman, Forrest M. ;
Koven, Charles D. ;
Lindsay, Keith ;
Pritchard, Michael S. ;
Swann, Abigail L. S. ;
Randerson, James T. .
GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2018, 45 (22) :12457-12466
[80]  
Krause P., 2005, ADV GEOSCIENCES, V5, P89, DOI [10.5194/adgeo-5-89-2005, DOI 10.5194/ADGEO-5-89-2005]