Analysis of Binary and Ternary Message Passing Decoding for Generalized LDPC Codes

被引:0
|
作者
Ben Yacoub, Emna [1 ]
Liva, Gianluigi [2 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Munich, Inst Commun Engn, D-80333 Munich, Germany
[2] German Aerosp Ctr DLR, Inst Commun & Nav, D-82234 Wessling, Germany
关键词
Binary and ternary message passing; GLDPC codes; density evolution; bounded distance decoding; PRODUCT; ALGORITHMS; CAPACITY;
D O I
10.1109/TCOMM.2023.3292474
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
The performance of generalized low-density parity-check (GLDPC) codes under binary and ternary message passing decoding (BMP/TMP) is analyzed from a density evolution (DE) perspective. At the check nodes, two types of local decoders are considered, namely optimum a-posteriori probability (APP) soft-input soft-output decoding, and bounded distance decoding (BDD). The purpose is to shed light on the performance loss incurred by BMP and TMP decoding of GLDPC codes with respect to unquantized belief propagation (BP) decoding. A DE analysis for irregular code ensembles is developed for all the algorithms, which allows obtaining the scaling coefficients needed for the variable node operation of BMP and TMP decoders. The stability analysis for the case of bounded distance decoding at the check nodes is derived. The asymptotic DE analysis is confirmed by the finite-length simulation results. For the codes analyzed in this paper, which rely on extended Hamming component codes, the study shows that under BMP decoding, BDD at the check nodes yields almost the same performance as optimum APP check node processing, while under TMP decoding the loss incurred by the sub-optimum BDD at check nodes is within 0.7 dB, when compared with APP decoding at the check nodes.
引用
收藏
页码:5078 / 5092
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Convergence Analysis of Generalized Serial Message-Passing Schedules
    Sharon, Eran
    Presman, Noam
    Litsyn, Simon
    IEEE JOURNAL ON SELECTED AREAS IN COMMUNICATIONS, 2009, 27 (06) : 1013 - 1024
  • [32] A Low Complexity Decoding Scheme for Raptor-Like LDPC Codes
    Xu, Yin
    Zhang, Genning
    Ju, Hao
    He, Dazhi
    Sun, Jun
    Wu, Yiyan
    Zhang, Wenjun
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BROADCASTING, 2019, 65 (04) : 770 - 776
  • [33] Convergence Speed Analysis of Layered Decoding of Block-Type LDPC Codes
    Jang, Min-Ho
    Shin, Beomkyu
    Park, Woo-Myoung
    No, Jong-Seon
    Shin, Dong-Joon
    IEICE TRANSACTIONS ON COMMUNICATIONS, 2009, E92B (07) : 2484 - 2487
  • [34] Deep Learning-Based Bit Reliability Based Decoding for Non-binary LDPC Codes
    Watanabe, Taishi
    Ohseki, Takeo
    Yamazaki, Kosuke
    2021 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON INFORMATION THEORY (ISIT), 2021, : 1451 - 1456
  • [35] OPTIMAL OUTPUT QUANTIZATION OF BINARY INPUT AWGN CHANNEL FOR BELIEF-PROPAGATION DECODING OF LDPC CODES
    Cho, Junho
    Kim, Jonghong
    Sung, Wonyong
    2012 IEEE WORKSHOP ON SIGNAL PROCESSING SYSTEMS (SIPS), 2012, : 282 - 287
  • [36] Iterative Reliability-Based Modified Majority-Logic Decoding for Structured Binary LDPC Codes
    Chen, Haiqiang
    Luo, Lingshan
    Sun, Youming
    Li, Xiangcheng
    Wan, Haibin
    Luo, Liping
    Qin, Tuanfa
    JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATIONS AND NETWORKS, 2015, 17 (04) : 339 - 345
  • [37] Fast-Converging Flipping Rules for Symbol Flipping Decoding of Non-Binary LDPC Codes
    Zhao, Zhanzhan
    Jiao, Xiaopeng
    Mu, Jianjun
    He, Yu-Cheng
    Guo, Junjun
    IEICE TRANSACTIONS ON FUNDAMENTALS OF ELECTRONICS COMMUNICATIONS AND COMPUTER SCIENCES, 2019, E102A (07) : 930 - 933
  • [38] On the Decomposition Method for Linear Programming Decoding of LDPC Codes
    Liu, Haiyang
    Qu, Wenze
    Liu, Bin
    Chen, Jie
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON COMMUNICATIONS, 2010, 58 (12) : 3448 - 3458
  • [39] The Stability Condition of LDPC Codes Under MAP Decoding
    Liu, Wei
    Urbanke, Rudiger
    2018 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON INFORMATION THEORY (ISIT), 2018, : 811 - 815
  • [40] On Bit-Level Decoding of Nonbinary LDPC Codes
    Zhang, Mu
    Cai, Kui
    Huang, Qin
    Yuan, Shuai
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON COMMUNICATIONS, 2018, 66 (09) : 3736 - 3748