Green finance and ecological footprints: Natural resources perspective of China's growing economy

被引:14
作者
Zhang, Shaohui [1 ]
Chen, Kenjie [2 ]
机构
[1] Guangdong Univ Finance, Sch Credit Management, Guangzhou 510521, Peoples R China
[2] Guangdong Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Finance & Econ, Dongguan 523083, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Ecological footprints; Green finance; Renewable electricity; Natural resources; Research and development; China; TESTS; COINTEGRATION; REGRESSION;
D O I
10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.103898
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Economies across the globe are targeting various economic and financial instruments to attain environmental sustainability. This study explores the influence of green finance on ecological footprints in the case of Chine throughout 1998Q1-2020Q4. Also, it analyze the role of renewable electricity output, natural resources, economic growth, and research and development in realizing ecological footprint. Using time series cointegration approach, the study validates the long-run equilibrium relationship between variables. Three long-run estimators have been used to attain coefficients for each variable. The results asserted that economic growth and natural resources are vital in increasing environmental pollution. However, green finance, research and development expenditure, and renewable electricity significantly reduce ecological footprints and strengthen environmental sustainability. The Granger causality test depicts the bidirectional causal connection between the variables, except for green finance. The results suggest the enhancement in green financing budget, research and development expenditure, and renewable electricity investment are imperative to ensure ecological sustainability.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 60 条
  • [1] The effect of financial development and economic growth on ecological footprint in Azerbaijan: an ARDL bound test approach with structural breaks
    Acar, Samet
    Altintas, Nurullah
    Haziyev, Vugar
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL AND ECOLOGICAL STATISTICS, 2023, 30 (01) : 41 - 59
  • [2] The potency of eco-innovation, natural resource and financial development on ecological footprint: a quantile-ARDL-based evidence from China
    Afshan, Sahar
    Yaqoob, Tanzeela
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2022, 29 (33) : 50675 - 50685
  • [3] The dynamic impact of natural resources, technological innovations and economic growth on ecological footprint: An advanced panel data estimation
    Ahmad, Mahmood
    Jiang, Ping
    Majeed, Abdul
    Umar, Muhammad
    Khan, Zeeshan
    Muhammad, Sulaman
    [J]. RESOURCES POLICY, 2020, 69 (69)
  • [4] Effects of economic complexity, economic growth, and renewable energy technology budgets on ecological footprint: the role of democratic accountability
    Ahmed, Zahoor
    Adebayo, Tomiwa Sunday
    Udemba, Edmund Ntom
    Murshed, Muntasir
    Kirikkaleli, Dervis
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2022, 29 (17) : 24925 - 24940
  • [5] Economic growth, renewable energy consumption, and ecological footprint: Exploring the role of environmental regulations and democracy in sustainable development
    Ahmed, Zahoor
    Ahmad, Mahmood
    Rjoub, Husam
    Kalugina, Olga A.
    Hussain, Nazim
    [J]. SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2022, 30 (04) : 595 - 605
  • [6] Efficiently managing green information and communication technologies, high-technology exports, and research and development expenditures: A case study
    Aldakhil, Abdullah Mohammed
    Zaheer, Adyia
    Younas, Sobia
    Nassani, Abdelmohsen A.
    Abro, Muhammad Moinuddin Qazi
    Zaman, Khalid
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 240
  • [7] Sustainable environment, energy and finance in China: evidence from dynamic modelling using carbon emissions and ecological footprints
    Ali, Rizwan
    Rehman, Mubeen Abdur
    Rehman, Ramiz Ur
    Ntim, Collins G.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2022, 29 (52) : 79095 - 79110
  • [8] The dynamic impact of biomass and natural resources on ecological footprint in BRICS economies: A quantile regression evidence
    Awosusi, Abraham Ayobamiji
    Adebayo, Tomiwa Sunday
    Altuntas, Mehmet
    Agyekum, Ephraim Bonah
    Zawbaa, Hossam M.
    Kamel, Salah
    [J]. ENERGY REPORTS, 2022, 8 : 1979 - 1994
  • [9] Investigating the EKC hypothesis with nanotechnology, renewable energy consumption, economic growth and ecological footprint in G7 countries: panel data analyses with structural breaks
    Aydin, Mucahit
    Koc, Pinar
    Sahpaz, Kadriye Izgi
    [J]. ENERGY SOURCES PART B-ECONOMICS PLANNING AND POLICY, 2023, 18 (01)
  • [10] The nexus between economic growth, renewable energy and ecological footprint: An empirical evidence from most oil-producing countries
    Cakmak, Eyup Ensar
    Acar, Samet
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2022, 352