Multicenter Reproducibility of Liver Iron Quantification with 1.5-T and 3.0-T MRI

被引:28
|
作者
Hernando, Diego [1 ,2 ]
Zhao, Ruiyang [1 ,2 ]
Yuan, Qing [9 ]
Ghasabeh, Mounes Aliyari [11 ]
Ruschke, Stefan
Miao, Xinran [3 ]
Karampinos, Dimitrios C.
Mao, Lu [4 ]
Harris, David T. [1 ]
Mattison, Ryan J. [5 ]
Jeng, Michael R.
Pedrosa, Ivan [9 ,10 ]
Kamel, Ihab R. [11 ]
Vasanawala, Shreyas
Yokoo, Takeshi [9 ,10 ]
Reeder, Scott B. [1 ,2 ,6 ,7 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin Madison, Dept Radiol, 1111 Highland Ave,WIMR2,Room 2472, Madison, WI 53705 USA
[2] Univ Wisconsin Madison, Dept Med Phys, 1111 Highland Ave,WIMR2,Room 2472, Madison, WI 53705 USA
[3] Univ Wisconsin Madison, Dept Stat, 1111 Highland Ave,WIMR2,Room 2472, Madison, WI 53705 USA
[4] Univ Wisconsin Madison, Dept Biostat & Med Informat, 1111 Highland Ave,WIMR2,Room 2472, Madison, WI 53705 USA
[5] Univ Wisconsin Madison, Dept Med, 1111 Highland Ave,WIMR2,Room 2472, Madison, WI 53705 USA
[6] Univ Wisconsin Madison, Dept Biomed Engn, 1111 Highland Ave,WIMR2,Room 2472, Madison, WI 53705 USA
[7] Univ Wisconsin Madison, Dept Med, 1111 Highland Ave,WIMR2,Room 2472, Madison, WI 53705 USA
[8] Univ Wisconsin Madison, Dept Emergency Med, 1111 Highland Ave,WIMR2,Room 2472, Madison, WI 53705 USA
[9] Univ Texas Southwestern Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, Dallas, TX USA
[10] Univ Texas Southwestern Med Ctr, Adv Imaging Res Ctr, Dallas, TX USA
[11] Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Radiol, Baltimore, MD USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
SICKLE-CELL-DISEASE; MAGNETIC-RESONANCE; OVERLOAD; BIOPSY; FAT; R2-ASTERISK-RELAXOMETRY; THALASSEMIA; STORES;
D O I
10.1148/radiol.213256
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background: MRI is a standard of care tool to measure liver iron concentration (LIC). Compared with regulatory-approved R2 MRI, R2* MRI has superior speed and is available in most MRI scanners; however, the cross-vendor reproducibility of R2*-based LIC estimation remains unknown.Purpose: To evaluate the reproducibility of LIC via single-breath-hold R2* MRI at both 1.5 T and 3.0 T with use of a multicenter, multivendor study.Materials and Methods: Four academic medical centers using MRI scanners from three different vendors (three 1.5-T scanners, one 2.89-T scanner, and two 3.0-T scanners) participated in this prospective cross-sectional study. Participants with known or suspected liver iron overload were recruited to undergo multiecho gradient-echo MRI for R2* mapping at 1.5 T and 3.0 T (2.89 T or 3.0 T) on the same day. R2* maps were reconstructed from the multiecho images and analyzed at a single center. Reference LIC measure-ments were obtained with a commercial R2 MRI method performed using standardized 1.5-T spin-echo imaging. R2*-versus-LIC calibrations were generated across centers and field strengths using linear regression and compared using F tests. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to determine the diagnostic performance of R2* MRI in the detection of clinically relevant LIC thresholds.Results: A total of 207 participants (mean age, 38 years +/- 20 [SD]; 117 male participants) were evaluated between March 2015 and September 2019. A linear relationship was confirmed between R2* and LIC. All calibrations within the same field strength were highly reproducible, showing no evidence of statistically significant center-specific differences (P > .43 across all comparisons). Calibrations for 1.5 T and 3.0 T were generated, as follows: for 1.5 T, LIC (in milligrams per gram [dry weight]) = -0.16 + 2.603 x 10-2 R2* (in seconds-1); for 2.89 T, LIC (in milligrams per gram) = -0.03 + 1.400 x 10-2 R2* (in seconds-1); for 3.0 T, LIC (in mil-ligrams per gram) = -0.03 + 1.349 x 10-2R2* (in seconds-1). Liver R2* had high diagnostic performance in the detection of clini-cally relevant LIC thresholds (area under the ROC curve, >0.98).Conclusion: R2* MRI enabled accurate and reproducible quantification of liver iron overload over clinically relevant ranges of liver iron concentration (LIC). The data generated in this study provide the necessary calibrations for broad clinical dissemination of R2*-based LIC quantification.ClinicalTrials.gov registration no.: NCT02025543 (c) RSNA, 2022
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Reproducibility of liver iron concentration measured by R2*method based on 1.5-T MRI: a meta-analysis
    Cao, Sue
    Zhang, Jie
    Dong, Chenyu
    Que, Yutao
    Gao, Xin
    Guo, Ruomi
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2025,
  • [22] Uterine Cervical Carcinoma: Preoperative Staging with 3.0-T MR Imaging-Comparison with 1.5-T MR Imaging
    Hori, Masatoshi
    Kim, Tonsok
    Murakami, Takamichi
    Imaoka, Izumi
    Onishi, Hiromitsu
    Tomoda, Kaname
    Tsutsui, Tateki
    Enomoto, Takayuki
    Kimura, Tadashi
    Nakamura, Hironobu
    RADIOLOGY, 2009, 251 (01) : 96 - 104
  • [23] 3.0-T MRI of the supraspinatus tendon
    Magee, Thomas
    Williams, David
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2006, 187 (04) : 881 - 886
  • [24] Peripheral Arterial Occlusive Disease: 3.0-T versus 1.5-T MR Angiography Compared with Digital Subtraction Angiography
    van den Bosch, Harrie C. M.
    Westenberg, Jos J. M.
    Caris, Ralph
    Duijm, Lucien E. M.
    Tielbeek, Alexander V.
    Cuypers, Philip W. M.
    de Roos, Albert
    RADIOLOGY, 2013, 266 (01) : 337 - 346
  • [25] Prospective Comparison of 1.5 and 3.0-T MRI for Evaluating the Knee Menisci and ACL
    Van Dyck, Pieter
    Vanhoenacker, Flip M.
    Lambrecht, Valerie
    Wouters, Kristien
    Gielen, Jan L.
    Dossche, Lieven
    Parizel, Paul M.
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2013, 95A (10): : 916 - 924
  • [26] Metal artifacts of hip arthroplasty implants at 1.5-T and 3.0-T: a closer look into the B1 effects
    Iman Khodarahmi
    John Kirsch
    Gregory Chang
    Jan Fritz
    Skeletal Radiology, 2021, 50 : 1007 - 1015
  • [27] Practical Application of Multivendor MRI-Based R2 Mapping for Liver Iron Quantification at 1.5 T and 3.0 T
    Simchick, Gregory
    Zhao, Ruiyang
    Yuan, Qing
    Ghasabeh, Mounes Aliyari
    Ruschke, Stefan
    Karampinos, Dimitrios C.
    Harris, David T.
    do Vale Souza, Raphael
    Mattison, Ryan J.
    Jeng, Michael R.
    Pedrosa, Ivan
    Kamel, Ihab R.
    Vasanawala, Shreyas
    Yokoo, Takeshi
    Reeder, Scott B.
    Hernando, Diego
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2025, 61 (01) : 150 - 165
  • [28] Assessment of Cardiac Iron Overload in Thalassemia With MRI on 3.0-T High-Field T1, T2, and T2*Quantitative Parametric Mapping in Comparison to T2*on 1.5-T
    Krittayaphong, Rungroj
    Zhang, Shuo
    Saiviroonporn, Pairash
    Viprakasit, Vip
    Tanapibunpon, Prajak
    Rerkudom, Boonying
    Yindeengam, Ahthit
    Wood, John C.
    JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING, 2019, 12 (04) : 752 - 754
  • [29] Metal artifacts of hip arthroplasty implants at 1.5-T and 3.0-T: a closer look into the B1effects
    Khodarahmi, Iman
    Kirsch, John
    Chang, Gregory
    Fritz, Jan
    SKELETAL RADIOLOGY, 2021, 50 (05) : 1007 - 1015
  • [30] Abdominopelvic 1.5-T and 3.0-T MR Imaging in Healthy Volunteers: Relationship to Formation of DNA Double-Strand Breaks
    Suntharalingam, Saravanabavaan
    Mladenov, Emil
    Sarabhai, Theresia
    Wetter, Axel
    Kraff, Oliver
    Quick, Harald H.
    Forsting, Michael
    Iliakis, Georg
    Nassenstein, Kai
    RADIOLOGY, 2018, 288 (02) : 529 - 535