Cohesive zone model based reliability analysis for a sandwich pipe

被引:11
|
作者
Qu, Yangyang [1 ]
Chen, Nian-Zhong [1 ,2 ]
Yuan, Lin [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Tianjin Univ, Sch Civil Engn, Tianjin 300350, Peoples R China
[2] Tianjin Univ, State Key Lab Hydraul Engn Simulat & Safety, Tianjin 300350, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Sandwich pipe (SP); Collapse; Burst; Cohesive zone model; Reliability analysis; Response -surface method; STRUCTURAL RELIABILITY; EXTERNAL-PRESSURE; PIPELINES; STRENGTH;
D O I
10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.113550
中图分类号
U6 [水路运输]; P75 [海洋工程];
学科分类号
0814 ; 081505 ; 0824 ; 082401 ;
摘要
A cohesive zone model based reliability analysis for a sandwich pipe (SP) is presented in this paper. The collapse or burst strength of SP is predicted by a cohesive zone model based nonlinear finite element (FE) analysis. The interlayer adhesion is simulated by cohesive zone model in accordance with the maximum shear strength. The bilinear traction separation law is employed in the cohesive zone model. A quadratic stress criterion and an energy-based model are used for simulating the damage initiation and evolution. The validity of the FE analysis is then validated by the comparison between model prediction and experimental results. A first-order reliability method coupled with a response-surface method is then used for reliability estimate dealing with implicit limit state functions corresponding to failure modes of collapse and burst. A sensitivity analysis to investigate the influence of design variables on the reliability of SP is further conducted and the results show that working pressure, yield strength of material, and modelling uncertainties are relatively important design variables in predicting the collapse and burst strength of SP, while initial ovalities of internal and external pipes could be regarded as constants in the reliability analysis for improving the computational efficiency.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Analysis of Cracking Characteristics with Indenter Geometry Using Cohesive Zone Model
    Hyun, Hong Chul
    Lee, Jin Haeng
    Lee, Hyungyil
    Kim, Dae Hyun
    Hahn, Jun Hee
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE KOREAN SOCIETY OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS A, 2013, 37 (12) : 1453 - 1463
  • [22] Delamination analysis of woven fabrication laminates using cohesive zone model
    Mohsen Moslemi
    Mohammadreza Khoshravan azar
    JournalofCentralSouthUniversity, 2016, 23 (01) : 27 - 38
  • [23] IMPROVED COHESIVE ZONE MODEL AND ITS APPLICATION IN INTERFACE CONTACT ANALYSIS
    Y.Wang J.Chen~* H.B.Li National Die & Mold CAD Engineering Research Center
    Acta Metallurgica Sinica(English Letters), 2008, (04) : 295 - 302
  • [24] A new energy based mixed-mode cohesive zone model
    de Moura, M. F. S. F.
    Goncalves, J. P. M.
    Silva, F. G. A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOLIDS AND STRUCTURES, 2016, 102 : 112 - 119
  • [25] Improved cohesive zone model and its application in interface contact analysis
    Wang, Y.
    Chen, J.
    Li, H.B.
    Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters), 2008, 21 (04) : 295 - 302
  • [26] A peridynamics-based cohesive zone model (PD-CZM) for predicting cohesive crack propagation
    Yang, Dong
    He, Xiaoqiao
    Liu, Xuefeng
    Deng, Yajie
    Huang, Xiaohua
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL SCIENCES, 2020, 184 (184)
  • [27] Research on fracture property of CMDB propellant based on cohesive zone model
    Zheng J.
    Yu J.-Q.
    Zhou C.-S.
    Jia D.
    Tuijin Jishu/Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2016, 37 (11): : 2181 - 2186
  • [28] Delamination analysis of woven fabrication laminates using cohesive zone model
    Mohsen Moslemi
    Mohammadreza Khoshravan azar
    Journal of Central South University, 2016, 23 : 27 - 38
  • [29] Delamination analysis of woven fabrication laminates using cohesive zone model
    Moslemi, Mohsen
    Azar, Mohammadreza Khoshravan
    JOURNAL OF CENTRAL SOUTH UNIVERSITY, 2016, 23 (01) : 27 - 38
  • [30] Development of a damage propagation analysis system based on level set XFEM using the cohesive zone model
    Nagashima, T.
    Sawada, M.
    COMPUTERS & STRUCTURES, 2016, 174 : 42 - 53