Toxic chemical releases and idiosyncratic return volatility: A prospect theory perspective

被引:3
作者
Bahadar, Stephen [1 ]
Nadeem, Muhammad [2 ]
Zaman, Rashid [3 ]
机构
[1] Auckland Univ Technol, Dept Finance, Auckland, New Zealand
[2] Univ Otago, Otago Business Sch, Dept Accountancy & Finance, Dunedin, New Zealand
[3] Edith Cowan Univ, Sch Business & Law, 270 Joondalup Dr, Joondalup, WA 6027, Australia
关键词
Fama-French three-factor model; idiosyncratic return volatility; prospect theory; toxic chemical releases; CORPORATE ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE; BEHAVIORAL AGENCY MODEL; FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE; POLLUTION-ABATEMENT; EQUITY PREMIUM; STOCK RETURNS; RISK; INFORMATION; MANAGEMENT; GREEN;
D O I
10.1111/acfi.12951
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
We investigated whether and how firms' toxic chemical releases (TCRs) affect idiosyncratic return volatility (IRV) using a prospect theory lens. Utilising a large sample of US public listed firms over the period 2001-2018, we find a significant and positive association between TCRs and IRV, suggesting that firms releasing more toxic chemicals have higher IRV. Additional analyses show that a positive association between TCR and IRV is more evident among firms with (i) high revenue, (ii) lower financial constraints and (iii) fewer environmental violations. A further test also suggests that a positive association between TCRs and IRV is contingent on political leadership ideology and market states. Our results remain consistent with weighted TCRs, IRV based on the Fama-French three-factor model, fixed-effect two-stage least square estimator (FE-2SLS), and other robustness checks. These findings shed light on the role of equity markets as a driver for capital-intensive pollution abatement activities and enhanced compliance with environmental laws, standards and best practices.
引用
收藏
页码:2109 / 2143
页数:35
相关论文
共 152 条
[71]  
2-Q]
[72]  
Hassel Lars., 2005, European Accounting Review, V14, P41, DOI DOI 10.1080/0963818042000279722
[73]   Factors Influencing Corporate Environmental Protection Activities for Greenhouse Gas Emission Reductions: The Relationship Between Environmental and Financial Performance [J].
Hatakeda, Takashi ;
Kokubu, Katsuhiko ;
Kajiwara, Takehisa ;
Nishitani, Kimitaka .
ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2012, 53 (04) :455-481
[74]   The effect of green investment on corporate behavior [J].
Heinkel, R ;
Kraus, A ;
Zechner, J .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL AND QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS, 2001, 36 (04) :431-449
[76]   Greenhouse Gas Reductions under Low Carbon Fuel Standards? [J].
Holland, Stephen P. ;
Hughes, Jonathan E. ;
Knittel, Christopher R. .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC JOURNAL-ECONOMIC POLICY, 2009, 1 (01) :106-146
[77]  
Hong H., 2012, Financial Constraints on Corporate Goodness, DOI DOI 10.3386/W18476
[78]   Does environmental performance affect financial performance? A meta-analysis [J].
Horvathova, Eva .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2010, 70 (01) :52-59
[79]   Reconciling climate-conflict meta-analyses: reply to Buhaug et al. [J].
Hsiang, Solomon M. ;
Burke, Marshall ;
Miguel, Edward .
CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2014, 127 (3-4) :399-405
[80]   Chemical releases and corporate cash holdings [J].
Huang, Henry He ;
Liu, Chanjuan ;
Sun, Li .
INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF FINANCIAL ANALYSIS, 2019, 64 :159-173