Toxic chemical releases and idiosyncratic return volatility: A prospect theory perspective

被引:3
作者
Bahadar, Stephen [1 ]
Nadeem, Muhammad [2 ]
Zaman, Rashid [3 ]
机构
[1] Auckland Univ Technol, Dept Finance, Auckland, New Zealand
[2] Univ Otago, Otago Business Sch, Dept Accountancy & Finance, Dunedin, New Zealand
[3] Edith Cowan Univ, Sch Business & Law, 270 Joondalup Dr, Joondalup, WA 6027, Australia
关键词
Fama-French three-factor model; idiosyncratic return volatility; prospect theory; toxic chemical releases; CORPORATE ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE; BEHAVIORAL AGENCY MODEL; FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE; POLLUTION-ABATEMENT; EQUITY PREMIUM; STOCK RETURNS; RISK; INFORMATION; MANAGEMENT; GREEN;
D O I
10.1111/acfi.12951
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
We investigated whether and how firms' toxic chemical releases (TCRs) affect idiosyncratic return volatility (IRV) using a prospect theory lens. Utilising a large sample of US public listed firms over the period 2001-2018, we find a significant and positive association between TCRs and IRV, suggesting that firms releasing more toxic chemicals have higher IRV. Additional analyses show that a positive association between TCR and IRV is more evident among firms with (i) high revenue, (ii) lower financial constraints and (iii) fewer environmental violations. A further test also suggests that a positive association between TCRs and IRV is contingent on political leadership ideology and market states. Our results remain consistent with weighted TCRs, IRV based on the Fama-French three-factor model, fixed-effect two-stage least square estimator (FE-2SLS), and other robustness checks. These findings shed light on the role of equity markets as a driver for capital-intensive pollution abatement activities and enhanced compliance with environmental laws, standards and best practices.
引用
收藏
页码:2109 / 2143
页数:35
相关论文
共 152 条
[1]   Product market competition, idiosyncratic and systematic volatility [J].
Abdoh, Hussein ;
Varela, Oscar .
JOURNAL OF CORPORATE FINANCE, 2017, 43 :500-513
[2]   Does local religiosity matter for bank risk-taking? [J].
Adhikari, Binay Kumar ;
Agrawal, Anup .
JOURNAL OF CORPORATE FINANCE, 2016, 38 :272-293
[3]   Uncovering Real Earnings Management: Pay Attention to Risk-Taking Behavior [J].
Alharbi, Samar ;
Al Mamun, Md ;
Atawnah, Nader .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL STUDIES, 2021, 9 (04)
[4]   Executive stock options, differential risk-taking incentives, and firm value [J].
Armstrong, Christopher S. ;
Vashishtha, Rahul .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2012, 104 (01) :70-88
[5]   Does exposure to foreign competition affect stock liquidity? Evidence from industry-level import data [J].
Atawnah, Nader ;
Balachandran, Balasingham ;
Huu Nhan Duong ;
Podolski, Edward J. .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL MARKETS, 2018, 39 :44-67
[6]   The Herds of Bulls and Bears in Leveraged ETF Market [J].
Bahadar, Stephen ;
Mahmood, Haroon ;
Zaman, Rashid .
JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL FINANCE, 2019, 20 (04) :408-423
[7]  
Bansal P, 2004, ACAD MANAGE J, V47, P93, DOI [10.2307/20159562, 10.5465/20159562]
[8]   Prospect Theory and Stock Returns: An Empirical Test [J].
Barberis, Nicholas ;
Mukherjee, Abhiroop ;
Wang, Baolian .
REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STUDIES, 2016, 29 (11) :3068-3107
[9]   No place to hide: The global crisis in equity markets in 2008/2009 [J].
Bartram, Soehnke M. ;
Bodnar, Gordon M. .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MONEY AND FINANCE, 2009, 28 (08) :1246-1292
[10]   Corporate social responsibility, stakeholder risk, and idiosyncratic volatility [J].
Becchetti, Leonardo ;
Ciciretti, Rocco ;
Hasan, Iftekhar .
JOURNAL OF CORPORATE FINANCE, 2015, 35 :297-309