Propensity-score Matched and Coarsened-exact Matched Analysis Comparing Robotic and Laparoscopic Major Hepatectomies: An International Multicenter Study of 4822 Cases

被引:22
作者
Liu, Qu [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Wanguang [3 ,4 ]
Zhao, Joseph J. [5 ]
Syn, Nicholas L. [5 ]
Cipriani, Federica [6 ]
Alzoubi, Mohammad [7 ]
Aghayan, Davit L. [8 ,9 ]
Siow, Tiing-Foong [10 ]
Lim, Chetana [11 ]
Scatton, Olivier [11 ]
Herman, Paulo [12 ]
Coelho, Fabricio Ferreira [12 ]
Marino, Marco, V [13 ,14 ]
Mazzaferro, Vincenzo [15 ,16 ]
Chiow, Adrian K. H. [17 ]
Sucandy, Iswanto [18 ]
Ivanecz, Arpad [19 ]
Choi, Sung-Hoon [20 ]
Lee, Jae Hoon [21 ]
Prieto, Mikel [22 ]
Vivarelli, Marco [23 ]
Giuliante, Felice [24 ]
Dalla Valle, Bernardo [25 ]
Ruzzenente, Andrea [25 ]
Yong, Chee-Chien [26 ]
Chen, Zewei [27 ]
Yin, Mengqiu [27 ]
Fondevila, Constantino [28 ,29 ]
Efanov, Mikhail [30 ]
Morise, Zenichi [31 ]
Di Benedetto, Fabrizio [32 ]
Brustia, Raffaele [33 ]
Dalla Valle, Raffaele [34 ]
Boggi, Ugo [35 ]
Geller, David [36 ]
Belli, Andrea [37 ]
Memeo, Riccardo [38 ]
Gruttadauria, Salvatore [39 ,40 ]
Mejia, Alejandro [41 ]
Park, James O. [42 ]
Rotellar, Fernando [43 ,44 ]
Choi, Gi-Hong [45 ]
Robles-Campos, Ricardo [46 ]
Wang, Xiaoying [47 ]
Sutcliffe, Robert P. [48 ]
Schmelzle, Moritz [49 ,50 ,51 ,52 ]
Pratschke, Johann [49 ,50 ,51 ,52 ]
Tang, Chung-Ngai [53 ]
Chong, Charing C. N. [54 ]
Lee, Kit-Fai [54 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Peoples Liberat Army PLA Gen Hosp, Med Ctr 1, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Peoples Liberat Army PLA Gen Hosp, Med Ctr 3, Organ Transplantat Dept, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Tongji Hosp, Tongji Med Coll, Hepat Surg Ctr, Wuhan, Peoples R China
[4] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Tongji Med Coll, Tongji Hosp, Hubei Key Lab Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis, Wuhan, Peoples R China
[5] Natl Univ Singapore, Yong Loo Lin Sch Med, Singapore, Singapore
[6] IRCCS San Raffaele Hosp, Hepatobiliary Surg Div, Milan, Italy
[7] Fdn Poliambulanza, Dept Surg, Brescia, Italy
[8] Univ Oslo, Intervent Ctr, Oslo Univ Hosp, Inst Clin Med, Oslo, Norway
[9] Univ Oslo, Oslo Univ Hosp, Inst Clin Med, Dept HPB Surg, Oslo, Norway
[10] Far Eastern Mem Hosp, Dept Surg, Div Gen Surg, New Taipei, Taiwan
[11] Sorbonne Univ, Dept Digest HBP & Liver Transplantat, Hop Pitie Salpetriere, Paris, France
[12] Univ Sao Paulo, Dept Gastroenterol, Liver Surg Unit, Sch Med, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[13] Azienda Osped Osped Riuniti Villa Sofia Cervello, Gen Surg Dept, Palermo, Italy
[14] F Tappeiner Hosp, Gen Surg Dept, Merano, Italy
[15] Fdn IRCCS Ist Nazl Tumori Milano, HPB Surg & Liver Transplantat, Milan, Italy
[16] Univ Milan, Milan, Italy
[17] Changi Gen Hosp, Dept Surg, Hepatopancreatobiliary Unit, Singapore, Singapore
[18] AdventHlth Tampa, Digest Hlth Inst, Tampa, FL USA
[19] Univ Med Ctr Maribor, Dept Abdominal & Gen Surg, Maribor, Slovenia
[20] CHA Univ, CHA Bundang Med Ctr, Dept Gen Surg, Sch Med, Pocheon Si, South Korea
[21] Univ Ulsan, Asan Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Div Hepatobiliary & Pancreat Surg,Coll Med, Seoul, South Korea
[22] Univ Basque Country, Cruces Univ Hosp, Biocruces Bizkaia Hlth Res Inst, Hepatobiliary Surg & Liver Transplantat Unit, Bilbao, Spain
[23] Polytech Univ Marche, United Hosp Ancona, Dept Expt & Clin Med, HPB Surg & Transplantat Unit, Ancona, Italy
[24] Univ Cattolica Sacro Cuore, Fdn Policlin Univ A Gemelli, Hepatobiliary Surg Unit, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
[25] Univ Verona, GB Rossi Hosp, Dept Surg Dent Gynecol & Pediat, Gen & Hepatobiliary Surg, Verona, Italy
[26] Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Dept Surg, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
[27] Zhejiang Univ, Affiliated Jinhua Hosp, Dept Hepatobiliary Surg, Sch Med, Jinhua, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[28] Univ Barcelona, Gen & Digest Surg, Hosp Clin, IDIBAPS CIBERehd, Barcelona, Spain
[29] Hosp Univ La Paz, CIBERehd, IdiPAZ, Gen & Digest Surg, Madrid, Spain
[30] Moscow Clin Sci Ctr, Dept Hepatopancreatobiliary Surg, Moscow, Russia
[31] Fujita Hlth Univ, Okazaki Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Sch Med, Okazaki, Aichi, Japan
[32] Univ Modena & Reggio Emilia, HPB Surg & Liver Transplant Unit, Modena, Italy
[33] Henri Mondor Hosp, AP HP, Dept Digest & Hepatobiliary & Pancreat Surg, Creteil, France
[34] Univ Parma, Dept Med & Surg, Hepatobiliary Surg Unit, Parma, Italy
[35] Univ Pisa, Div Gen & Transplant Surg, Pisa, Italy
[36] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Surg, Div Hepatobiliary & Pancreat Surg, Med Ctr, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[37] Natl Canc Ctr IRCCS G Pascale, Dept Abdominal Oncol, Div Hepatopancreatobiliary Surg Oncol, Naples, Italy
[38] F Miulli Gen Reg Hosp, Unit Hepatopancreatc Biliary Surg, Bari, Italy
[39] Univ Pittsburgh Med Ctr Italy, Ist Ricovero & Cura Carattere Sci Ist Mediterrane, Dept Treatment & Study Abdominal Dis & Abdominal, Palermo, Italy
[40] Univ Catania, Dept Gen Surg & Med Surg Specialties, Catania, Italy
[41] Methodist Dallas Med Ctr, Liver Inst, Dallas, TX USA
[42] Univ Washington, Dept Surg, Med Ctr, Seattle, WA USA
[43] Univ Navarra, Clin Univ Navarra, HPB & Liver Transplant Unit, Dept Gen Surg, Pamplona, Spain
[44] Inst Hlth Res Navarra IdisNA, Pamplona, Spain
[45] Yonsei Univ, Severance Hosp, Dept Surg, Div Hepatopancreatobiliary Surg,Coll Med, Seoul, South Korea
[46] Clin & Univ Hosp Virgen de la Arrixaca, Dept Gen Visceral & Transplantat Surg, IMIB ARRIXACA, Murcia, Spain
[47] Fudan Univ, Zhongshan Hosp, Liver Canc Inst, Dept Liver Surg & Transplantat, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[48] Univ Hosp Birmingham NHS Fdn Trust, Dept Hepatopancreatobiliary & Liver Transplant Su, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
[49] Charite, Campus Charite Mitte, Dept Surg, Berlin, Germany
[50] Charite, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Berlin, Germany
关键词
laparoscopic liver resection; extended right hepatectomy; major hepatectomy; right hepatectomy; robotic liver resection; OPEN LIVER RESECTION; HEPATOCELLULAR-CARCINOMA; LEARNING-CURVES; SURGERY; CIRRHOSIS; PROPOSAL; DIFFICULTY;
D O I
10.1097/SLA.0000000000005855
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: To compare the outcomes between robotic major hepatectomy (R-MH) and laparoscopic major hepatectomy (L-MH). Background: Robotic techniques may overcome the limitations of laparoscopic liver resection. However, it is unknown whether R-MH is superior to L-MH. Methods: This is a post hoc analysis of a multicenter database of patients undergoing R-MH or L-MH at 59 international centers from 2008 to 2021. Data on patient demographics, center experience volume, perioperative outcomes, and tumor characteristics were collected and analyzed. Both 1:1 propensity-score matched (PSM) and coarsened-exact matched (CEM) analyses were performed to minimize selection bias between both groups Results: A total of 4822 cases met the study criteria, of which 892 underwent R-MH and 3930 underwent L-MH. Both 1:1 PSM (841 R-MH vs. 841 L-MH) and CEM (237 R-MH vs. 356 L-MH) were performed. R-MH was associated with significantly less blood loss {PSM:200.0 [interquartile range (IQR):100.0, 450.0] vs 300.0 (IQR:150.0, 500.0) mL; P = 0.012; CEM:170.0 (IQR: 90.0, 400.0) vs 200.0 (IQR:100.0, 400.0) mL; P = 0.006}, lower rates of Pringle maneuver application (PSM: 47.1% vs 63.0%; P < 0.001; CEM: 54.0% vs 65.0%; P = 0.007) and open conversion (PSM: 5.1% vs 11.9%; P < 0.001; CEM: 5.5% vs 10.4%, P = 0.04) compared with L-MH. On subset analysis of 1273 patients with cirrhosis, R-MH was associated with a lower postoperative morbidity rate (PSM: 19.5% vs 29.9%; P = 0.02; CEM 10.4% vs 25.5%; P = 0.02) and shorter postoperative stay [PSM: 6.9 (IQR: 5.0, 9.0) days vs 8.0 (IQR: 6.0 11.3) days; P < 0.001; CEM 7.0 (IQR: 5.0, 9.0) days vs 7.0 (IQR: 6.0, 10.0) days; P = 0.047]. Conclusions: This international multicenter study demonstrated that R-MH was comparable to L-MH in safety and was associated with reduced blood loss, lower rates of Pringle maneuver application, and conversion to open surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:969 / 975
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Robotic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy for distal cholangiocarcinoma: a multicenter propensity score-matched study
    Xu, Shuai
    Zhang, Xiu-Ping
    Zhao, Guo-Dong
    Zou, Wen-Bo
    Zhao, Zhi-Ming
    Hu, Ming-Gen
    Gao, Yuan-Xing
    Tan, Xiang-Long
    Liu, Qu
    Liu, Rong
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2022, 36 (11): : 8237 - 8248
  • [32] Outcomes following laparoscopic versus open major hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with cirrhosis: a propensity score-matched analysis
    Xu, Hong-wei
    Liu, Fei
    Li, Hong-yu
    Wei, Yong-gang
    Li, Bo
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2018, 32 (02): : 712 - 719
  • [33] Robotic-Assisted Versus Laparoscopic Left Lateral Sectionectomy: Analysis of Surgical Outcomes and Costs by a Propensity Score Matched Cohort Study
    Salloum, Chady
    Lim, Chetana
    Lahat, Eylon
    Gavara, Concepcion Gomez I.
    Levesque, Eric
    Compagnon, Philippe
    Azoulay, Daniel
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2017, 41 (02) : 516 - 524
  • [34] Cost-effectiveness and quality of life analysis of laparoscopic and robotic distal pancreatectomy: a propensity score-matched study
    De Pastena, Matteo
    Esposito, Alessandro
    Paiella, Salvatore
    Surci, Niccolo
    Montagnini, Greta
    Marchegiani, Giovanni
    Malleo, Giuseppe
    Secchettin, Erica
    Casetti, Luca
    Claudio, Ricci
    Landoni, Luca
    Bovo, Chiara
    Bassi, Claudio
    Salvia, Roberto
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2021, 35 (03): : 1420 - 1428
  • [35] Robotic versus laparoscopic distal gastrectomy in patients with gastric cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis
    Isobe, Taro
    Murakami, Naotaka
    Minami, Taizan
    Tanaka, Yuya
    Kaku, Hideaki
    Umetani, Yuki
    Kizaki, Junya
    Aoyagi, Keishiro
    Fujita, Fumihiko
    Akagi, Yoshito
    BMC SURGERY, 2021, 21 (01)
  • [36] Robotic, laparoscopic, and open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: A propensity score matched analysis of perioperative outcomes
    'Connell, R. M.
    Bucheeri, M.
    Quidwai, O.
    Bourke, M.
    Gallagher, Tk
    Hoti, E.
    SURGERY IN PRACTICE AND SCIENCE, 2023, 14
  • [37] Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of Clinical and Financial Outcomes After Robotic and Laparoscopic Colorectal Resection
    Al-Mazrou, Ahmed M.
    Baser, Onur
    Kiran, Ravi P.
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2018, 22 (06) : 1043 - 1051
  • [38] Propensity score-matched analysis of laparoscopic-assisted and hand-assisted laparoscopic liver resection versus pure laparoscopic liver resection: an international multicenter study
    Felix Krenzien
    Moritz Schmelzle
    Johann Pratschke
    Nicholas L. Syn
    Iswanto Sucandy
    Adrian K. H. Chiow
    Marco V. Marino
    Mikel Gastaca
    Xiaoying Wang
    Jae Hoon Lee
    Charing C. Chong
    David Fuks
    Gi Hong Choi
    Mikhail Efanov
    T. Peter Kingham
    Mathieu D’Hondt
    Roberto I. Troisi
    Sung Hoon Choi
    Robert P. Sutcliffe
    Rong Liu
    Tan-To Cheung
    Chung Ngai Tang
    Ho-Seong Han
    Brian K. P. Goh
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2023, 37 : 5482 - 5493
  • [39] Single Port vs Multiport Robotic Pyeloplasty: Propensity-Score Matched Analysis of Perioperative and Follow-Up Outcomes
    Harrison, Robert
    Ahmed, Mutahar
    Billah, Mubashir
    Caviasco, Christina
    Cheng, Nathan
    Sanders, Angeline
    Lovallo, Gregory
    Stifelman, Michael
    UROLOGY, 2022, 160 : 124 - 129
  • [40] Single Port vs Multiport Robotic Pyeloplasty: Propensity-Score Matched Analysis of Perioperative and Follow-Up Outcomes
    Bednarz, Christopher
    Autorino, Riccardo
    UROLOGY, 2022, 160 : 129 - 129