Global warming potential comparison between green and conventional roofs in cold climate using life cycle assessment

被引:4
|
作者
Pique, Laurie [1 ]
Blanchet, Pierre [2 ]
Breton, Charles [3 ]
机构
[1] Dept Wood Sci, Ind Res Chaire Ecoresponsible Wood Construciton, Quebec City, PQ G1V 0A6, Canada
[2] NSERC Ind Res Chair Sustainable Wood Construct, Programs Wood & Biobased Mat Engn, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[3] Laval Univ, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Cold climate; Environmental benefits; Environmental costs; Green roof; Life cycle assessment; Simapro (c); PERFORMANCE; CARBON; IMPACT; SEQUESTRATION; STORAGE; LCA;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.138314
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Buildings are major contributors to climate change because of the greenhouse gas emissions released during their life cycle. Among building systems, green roofs are known for their potential environmental benefits. Many studies have focused on the environmental impacts of green roofs without considering their ability to sequester carbon. Furthermore, this environmental benefit is not well characterized in the cold climate conditions of the province of Quebec, Canada. The aim of this study was to identify the decoupling point between the environmental costs and the environmental benefits of green roofs compared to a conventional roof in a renewable energy mix, namely hydropower, and a cold climate context, namely subarctic climate. Few articles have modeled a comparative LCA taking into account a subarctic climate. Four roof assemblies were compared: extensive, semi-intensive and intensive green roofs, and one conventional roof. First, a cradle-to-grave life cycle analysis was conducted in Simapro (c) to assess the environmental impacts of the different roof assemblies. Then, a dynamic life cycle analysis was performed to quantify the environmental benefits. At this stage, the rate of carbon sequestration by plants planted on the three types of green roofs was taken into consideration, a factor not considered in many articles. The results indicate that the global warming potential of conventional roof, extensive, semi-intensive and intensive green roofs were 3328.54 kg CO2 eq, 3113.15 kg CO2 eq, 3147.45 kg CO2 eq and 3432.05 kg CO2 eq, respectively, over 45 years. Considering environmental benefits, the global warming potential of extensive, semi-intensive and intensive green roofs were reduced to 3051.5 kg CO2 eq, 3007.5 kg CO2 eq and 3292.1 kg CO2 eq, respectively. These results suggest that for a cold climate, the environmental benefits of green roofs are greater than the environmental costs of semi-intensive and intensive green roofs after 14 and 35 years of installation, respectively. For the extensive roof, it shows a carbon benefit for all 45 years. The highlights of this study are that green roofs have significant intrinsic impacts due to the materials they require. Another point is that carbon sequestration is negligible in reducing CO2 emissions in cold climates. A final point is that green roofs with a lifespan of less than 45 years increase their carbon impact.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Life cycle assessment of global warming potential, resource depletion and acidification potential of fossil, renewable and secondary feedstock for olefin production in Germany
    Keller, Florian
    Lee, Roh Pin
    Meyer, Bernd
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 250
  • [43] Development of a Comparative Assessment Method For Additive and Conventional Manufacturing With Regard to Global Warming Potential
    Pletzer-Zelgert, Leonie Pauline
    de Souza, Pereira Bruna
    Kolter, Moritz
    Traverso, Marzia
    Schleifenbaum, Johannes Henrich
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE CONFERENCE ON PRODUCTION SYSTEMS AND LOGISTICS, CPSL 2023-1, 2023, : 767 - 777
  • [44] Comparison between hydrogen and electric vehicles by life cycle assessment: A case study in Tuscany, Italy
    Bartolozzi, I.
    Rizzi, F.
    Frey, M.
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2013, 101 : 103 - 111
  • [45] Sustainable retrofitting for shipping: Assessing LNG dual fuel impact on global warming potential through life cycle assessment
    Maydison
    Lim, Hyung-Kyoon
    Heo, Jeong
    Choe, Sang-Bom
    Kim, Jin-Soo
    Jang, Jaewon
    Oh, Daekyun
    RESULTS IN ENGINEERING, 2024, 23
  • [46] Assessment of Chemical Products and Processes: Green Metrics and Life Cycle Assessment - A Comparison
    Bloemer, Jan
    Maga, Daniel
    Roettgen, Janek
    Wu, Zhengxuan
    Hiebel, Markus
    Eilebrecht, Sebastian
    Jentsch, Sebastian
    Eggers, Natascha
    CHEMIE INGENIEUR TECHNIK, 2024, 96 (05) : 561 - 574
  • [47] Assessment of Sustainable Construction Measures in Building Refurbishment-Life Cycle Comparison of Conventional and Multi-Active Facade Systems in a Social Housing Complex
    Sattler, Stefan
    Osterreicher, Doris
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (16)
  • [48] Modeling the substitution of natural materials with industrial byproducts in green roofs using life cycle assessments
    Pushkar, Svetlana
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 227 : 652 - 661
  • [49] Global warming implications of facade parameters: A life cycle assessment of residential buildings in Bahrain
    Radhi, Hassan
    Sharples, Stephen
    ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2013, 38 : 99 - 108
  • [50] Characterization Factors for Global Warming in Life Cycle Assessment Based on Damages to Humans and Ecosystems
    De Schryver, An M.
    Brakkee, Karin W.
    Goedkoop, Mark J.
    Huijbregts, Mark A. J.
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2009, 43 (06) : 1689 - 1695